Yeah - the classic "but they are better off than they would be bleh blah". When you take extremely hopeless, destitute people and throw them barely anything it appears you are really "putting yourself" out there for their benefit.
Reality says you are exploiting miserable people which is exactly what this is. In fairness its not just Apple doing it but its pretty sad nonethless. All because never-happy shareholders just cant be satisfied with great returns, they have to have super-great returns. Whatever.
A good analogy to "making these peoples lives better" would be this: Take a guy that has Stage 6 pancreatic cancer and instead give him Stage 5 pancreatic cancer. Sure, you just "improved" his situation and thats great but hes still going to die a slow, miserable death.