Uh, yeah.
It's not an issue of "terminology". If someone tells you you have a "scratched retina" when in fact you actually have a "scratched cornea", that is not a "morphed terminology". It is wrong.
Uh, yeah.
Exactly. Unless they somehow change the properties of sapphire, it will be heavier, less clear, require more battery (because it's less clear it will require more brightness), and it will be more shatter-prone. I have yet to hear the advantages that outweigh those disadvantages.
Dam 6S is gonna be sounding like a incredible update imo
-14nm Apple A9 chip/heading into S cycle which usually gives us biggest performance gains between iPhones, and would also give even better battery life for the next 6 Plus S and 6S iPhones
-supposively rumored to have dual camera lens setup for "dslr" like quality
-110% they fix whatever bend issues/body issues with current 6/6Plus
-sapphire screens now actually looking like it will actually happen next year according to this report
-
It's not an issue of "terminology". If someone tells you you have a "scratched retina" when in fact you actually have a "scratched cornea", that is not a "morphed terminology". It is wrong.
terminology |ˌtərməˈnäləjē|
noun (pl. terminologies)
the body of terms used with a particular technical application in a subject of study, theory, profession, etc.: the terminology of semiotics | specialized terminologies for higher education.
Only the first of them stands, if I am correct. The rest is just what people have made up. The last one would be really laughable.
Let me get this straight...Foxconn is currently seeking to build a plant and the expectation is that they can get the plant built, get the manufacturing equipment installed, get the equipment up and running, and be able to churn out usable sapphire in mass quantities all in less than one year? If they're able to pull all that off, I'll be absolutely astounded.
what does a sapphire screen bring to the iPhone? will it be lighter? will the screen be better more clear? will it increase battery life? otherwise I don't see a need for it other than its sapphire. So what. It has to bring more benefits else I'm not really impressed.
I do believe in foxconn capability to produce sapphire better then GTAT
7S = Speaker
Integrated Beats Audio
realistically....
-A9 - 50% faster
-2 gb ram
-Battery life - the same or maybe slightly improved.
-Better camera, as always.
-Bending will not be 'fixed'. theres nothing to fix. Phones will continue to bend and people will accept it as a fact of life, like how they accepted the back glass of the iphone 4 can break.
The iPhone 6S will be a longevity model that will last through to iOS 11 without feeling slow.
But realistically...I will wait the extra year and just get the iphone 7....
or whatever is the best thing by that time...
off topic but... it seems silly doesnt it, the fact that the iphone and ios versions are reaching as high as 7.... The last iPod classic was the gen 7 ipod. the iPhone's matured. I'm getting sick of paying $1000 for new phones every two years, when they're really not 'new'.
Sapphire isn't as big a blessing as you would be lead to believe. Very prone to shattering.
So much about bringing manufacturing jobs to the US.
... and still, many consider buying Apple products a "patriotic" act.
For shame, Apple, for shame.
![]()
This was planned all along.
The GT Advanced plant was just used to develop the expertise and do all the trial and error tests. Once all the kinks were worked out, they arranged to tear down the whole operation and set it up at Foxconn where everything could be done much cheaper and integrated into the assembly process already in place.
The feigned surprise at Apple that GT was going bankrupt was a dead giveaway.
So, Apple purposely bankrupt the American GT Advanced to steal the technology and give it to China in a deal to provide it cheaper?
you must be delusional if you dont think they are not going to fortify and make the next iPhone with the same body as now stronger then it is now, all they have to do is simple fixes and adjustments inside the frame to make it much more rigid and stronger, not that its terribly weak or so, but without a doubt they will improve that part of the phone 100%
----------
close to the same shatterness as glass displays now, but essentially almost unscratchable... ill take that
I would bet money that they won't.
In 12 months time "bend gate" wouldn't even be on the radar.
If you look at the current layout of the iPhone, there isn't alot that can be done for reinforcement. Bar the addition of another plate, which won't fit given the volume buttons placed where they are
There is no such thing as a "Sapphire Display". Sapphire is used as the cover for the display.
Screws could be placed better inside the framing where the bar is by the volume rocker stretch, this has already been confirmed
And eventually, everyone will just forget about GT and Apple's promise of all those jobs in Arizona and stick the state with the cost of tearing it all down.
Wanna bet?
Oh, dear. Apparently I have used the wrong terminology to discuss terminology.
"Confirmed"
Pretty strong wording to describe a blog post "analysis"
If it was such an easy fix it would have been done in the first place.
Fact is, no matter how far away the screw is, it will always act as a fullcrum. That weak spot is weak due to the volume buttons taking up the majority of the surface area of the sides
No. No changes will be made