Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The original exploit was reportedly through an unpatched Internet Explorer vulnerability from a worker inside Foxconn.

I read that and think about being in that guys shoes when he's found out, and it just sends chills up my spine.
 
GO FIGURE!

"The original exploit was reportedly through an unpatched Internet Explorer vulnerability..."

The answer to that is don't run Internet Exploder (IE)!!!

If you run that browser, you can patch all day, every day, and there will ALWAYS be a new hole for someone to find.

Agreed, but to be fair, that's true for every other browser aswell, not least for Safari, which has had a number of security flaws. And no, they're not all because of Flash.
There's no reason to believe a modern version of Internet Explorer (> 7) isn't as secure as other browsers.

I also would not be surprised if it was using IE6 as well.

I wouldn't be surprised either. IE6 still makes a dent in the browser usage statistics and it's mostly because it's still used on old computers in the developing world.

IE6, yes. But IE9 is a pretty damn fine browser.

Still not as good as the alternatives though.
 
Still not as good as the alternatives though.

It is better than most. The only browser that IE9 can't touch is Chrome. IE9 is much better than Firefox & IE9 is easily better than Opera & Safari.

Chrome is my browser of choice, but I have to use IE9 a lot especially for work. So with IE9, I use TPL to block ad's, Speckie for spellchecking, LastPass & Xmarks. And people say IE doesn't have any add-ons, pfft.
 
I just think it's ironic that there's IE adverts all over MacRumors when a) it's a Mac site and b) we're all sitting here slagging off IE!

Ironic? No. It's called keyword advertising. If everyone in the thread starting talking about Morgan Stanley - and Morgan Stanley had online ads - then you'd see ads for Morgan Stanley.

That's also not irony. I think you meant coincidental. They aren't the same thing.

Just FYI...
 
Often a tech company has non-technical staff interfacing with vendors, hence password security fumbled.
 
Kind of like when a woman dresses provocatively she deserves to be raped? Or when you leave the front door unlocked you deserve to have your family murdered?
I wouldn't dare answer affirmatively to the first, but I wouldn't be surprised if the first happened. If you want to live in society, you have to somewhat follow its rules, written and unwritten.

To the second question, an unlocked door isn't blatant, so if someone is approaching a door and finds it unlocked, he already must have bad intentions.


As for IE vulnerability... Come on, Chinese people went through skyrocketing growth, but still are using antiquated technology, whereas Western world has massively switched to Firefox for browsing? More secure and more privacy than Chrome's, more widespread than Safari. Success doesn't come by itself.

A post-it sticked to the monitor would have been more secure.
 
Indeed it does. There is a reason why I prefer the security and robustness of *NIX systems (like OSX). According to Digital Trends "Windows — which is the absolute king of malware."

Note: Not my words, just pointing out what Digital Trends claims.

Even the most secure operating system can be undermined by the applications running on it.
Just like you to turn this into your favourite pasttime; hating Microsoft.

Better it be IE than Safari, the least secure browser;

http://www.bgr.com/2011/03/10/apples-safari-browser-embarrassed-at-pwn2own-hacked-in-5-seconds/

5 second hack? That's pretty embarrassing.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.