Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Frank Ocean Releases Visual Album 'Endless' Exclusively on Apple Music

MacRumors

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
67,710
38,194



Just about two weeks after it was reported that R&B singer Frank Ocean's next album, "Boys Don't Cry," would be available exclusively on Apple music, the singer has released "Endless," a visual album exclusive to the service.

endless-800x306.png

An Apple representative told Pitchfork that the 45-minute visual album features new songs from the artist. The rep added that fans should "keep an eye out this weekend for more from Frank." It's unclear when Ocean's "Boys Don't Cry" is expected to launch.

"Endless" and "Boys Don't Cry" are just two of the high-profile exclusives Apple Music has secured in the past year. Other content includes Drake's "Views," Taylor Swift's "1989 World Tour LIVE" and Katy Perry's latest single "Rise."

"Endless" can be watched on Apple Music now. [Direct Link]

Article Link: Frank Ocean Releases Visual Album 'Endless' Exclusively on Apple Music
 
Article Link
https://www.macrumors.com/2016/08/19/frank-ocean-endless-apple-music/
I was looking forward to the follow up to Channel Orange. It's been so long that I don't give a damn anymore. Frank Ocean might be screwing himself by acting like his audience will wait forever. C'mon Frank Rose, release your Chinese Democracy already.
 
  • Like
Reactions: navaira
vmachiel said:
Which was fine when you bought music. I can image a near future where you need multiple streaming services if you want to listen to everything.
Click to expand...

In the future Tidal will be gone (they are hurting financials already), so you'll only need Apple Music for exclusives.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Col4bin
Zirel said:
In the future Tidal will be gone (they are hurting financials already), so you'll only need Apple Music for exclusives.
Click to expand...

Exactly. I can't see any musicians signing up to Spotify only, and not having their music - at least - on the iTunes Store. So Apple Music and iTunes to fill any gaps that might come up.

It's all irrelevant anyway unless Spotify can figure out how to become profitable.
[doublepost=1471593699][/doublepost]
vmachiel said:
Still, people that use Google/Amazon/Spotify will be screwed.
Click to expand...

They'll switch.

There's 'Move to iOS' - I can see Apple adding a feature to Music that allows you to import from Spotify, assuming it becomes clear people are beginning to switch in droves. (Which obviously isn't the case at the moment.)
 
Zirel said:
Don't sign for the wrong music services that exploit artists, and you'll be fine.

Spotify and YouTube are the cancer of music industry. Even more so than piracy. You could say that "nobody forces artists to go there", but when they have the market in their hands, you have to.
Click to expand...

Oh FFS, Apple was gonna not pay artists during the trial period, only changed that when they got caught out.

Exclusives suck, if the industry wants to curb piracy, music should be released on all platforms (Physical, Online Purchase and Online Streaming) at the same time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: navaira and Alenore
thekeyring said:
I can see Apple adding a feature to Music that allows you to import from Spotify,
Click to expand...

They probably can't do that, and it would become a game of cat and mouse.
[doublepost=1471594300][/doublepost]
oldmacs said:
Oh FFS, Apple was gonna not pay artists during the trial period, only changed that when they got caught out.

Exclusives suck, if the industry wants to curb piracy, music should be released on all platforms (Physical, Online Purchase and Online Streaming) at the same time.
Click to expand...

The trial period is a tiny little bit part of it.

Most people on Spotify don't pay, the ads don't pay even close to reasonable, there are cracks, there are contracts with carriers where you pay nothing basically, there's the tryout where people pay $0.99 for 3 months and can renew infinitely...

YouTube also pays even less for ad impressions...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Keane16
Zirel said:
The trial period is a tiny little bit part of it.

Most people on Spotify don't pay, the ads don't pay even close to reasonable, there are cracks, there are contracts with carriers where you pay nothing basically, there's the tryout where people pay $0.99 for 3 months and can renew infinitely...

YouTube also pays even less for ad impressions...
Click to expand...

The point is that Apple is not really much better than the others, as I said they tried to pay nothing for the trial period- they really don't care, they're only slightly less exploitive. At least Spotify does a good service keeping many who would be pirates at least paying something rather than nothing.
 
oldmacs said:
The point is that Apple is not really much better than the others, as I said they tried to pay nothing for the trial period- they really don't care, they're only slightly less exploitive. At least Spotify does a good service keeping many who would be pirates at least paying something rather than nothing.
Click to expand...

But Apple pays, Spotify is the pirate here, the amount they pay to artists while non-premium users listen is laughable.

Do you understand that artists only get 70% FROM WHATEVER the advertisers decide to pay? If an advertiser decides to pay $1, they get $0.70, if they de
 
I'm guessing he's also selling his music somewhere too?

Apple Music is only used by 15 million people. That's quite a small audience in the grand scheme of things.
 
Zirel said:
They probably can't do that, and it would become a game of cat and mouse.
Click to expand...

They can. Third parties already do it for you: http://movetoapple.com/ or https://freeyourmusic.com/

What do you mean by "it would become a game of cat and mouse"? If it ever did get to the point where Spotify was loosing popularity massively in favour of Apple Music, a tool from Apple to import Spotify playlists would make things easier for users. Spotify could set up one in retaliation but in this hypothetical future, not many people would notice.
[doublepost=1471597986][/doublepost]
oldmacs said:
The point is that Apple is not really much better than the others, as I said they tried to pay nothing for the trial period- they really don't care, they're only slightly less exploitive.
Click to expand...

To quote Tim Minchin, "Oh no wait, that's absolute ********". Apple pay for users' free trials. As far as the artists are concerned, there is no free trial. If a song is streamed on Apple Music, they are paid for it.

This wasn't their intention at the beginning, but they u-turned on it so fast, it was hardly Big Evil Apple trying to rip off the music industry.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back