Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Freescale Hints at Apple Netbook with Photo?
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I can see either a tablet or a netbook in Apple's future somewhere, when the technology/market is right, maybe a little before ...
Prices starting at...?
$1000? Nah, that sounds reasonable for a device like this... $1500? Maybe.
$1000? Nah, that sounds reasonable for a device like this... $1500? Maybe.
Freescale is a ****** company, I hate their programs but had to use it. Not very user friendly. That is why I don't trust this. I hate them!!!
Also Apple bought PA Semi more than 8 months ago, more than enough time to put out a prototype chip for this design. PA Semi is a very good company from a engineering stand point. They were in the running to supply apple with chips before apple chose intel.
Also Apple bought PA Semi more than 8 months ago, more than enough time to put out a prototype chip for this design. PA Semi is a very good company from a engineering stand point. They were in the running to supply apple with chips before apple chose intel.
Pff...give me a low cost one! Put in an Intel Atom or ARM chip, and it better not cost 1.5k!
599
699
Those sound better
I agree, but this is Apple we are dealing with. Competitive prices arent their forte.
If theres a $599 model that isnt crippled hardware-wise i will have a hard time not buying one.
It has been denied
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-10130690-64.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-5
(Note about Apple Netbook speculation: : Freescale says that the "speculation is inaccurate" that its i.MX51 chip will be used in an Apple Netbook, as some reports have stated. "Freescale's netbook approach is unambiguously an ARM/Linux play, and any suggestion otherwise is inaccurate," a Freescale spokesman said Sunday night.)
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-10130690-64.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-5
(Note about Apple Netbook speculation: : Freescale says that the "speculation is inaccurate" that its i.MX51 chip will be used in an Apple Netbook, as some reports have stated. "Freescale's netbook approach is unambiguously an ARM/Linux play, and any suggestion otherwise is inaccurate," a Freescale spokesman said Sunday night.)
Agreed. I don't think you can tell how much it will weigh -- you can barely guess what scale it will be by the pic...
Personally, I'm a "half way to another glass" kinda person. I think I'll wait & see. Looks cool anyways.
It actually looks like the whole thing is a touch screen, which makes me wonder if its legit or not. The giant touchscreen would drive the price up, but some idiots would pay for it anyway just because its a touchscreen regardless of price...
ooooooooh, ahhhhhhhh...
Apple will skip "Netbooks" - go to iPad (touch or stylus and Newton Technology) - $399 for 16Gig model...
Apple will skip "Netbooks" - go to iPad (touch or stylus and Newton Technology) - $399 for 16Gig model...
A) Thats a fake mockup
B) The Processor in question is only 1Ghz, SINGLE CORE!!! please people, its going to run slower than snail slime.
3) Its funny people think Apple would sell it for $399
ha ha ha
B) The Processor in question is only 1Ghz, SINGLE CORE!!! please people, its going to run slower than snail slime.
3) Its funny people think Apple would sell it for $399
ha ha ha
A) Thats a fake mockup
B) The Processor in question is only 1Ghz, SINGLE CORE!!! please people, its going to run slower than snail slime.
3) Its funny people think Apple would sell it for $399
ha ha ha
Mockups are fake...
Freescale just announced a CPU for $199 Netbooks, I assume ARM will follow, so $399 from Apple for this is feasible...
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-10130690-64.html?tag=newsEditorsPicksArea.0
Too much misinformation here.
In any event ARM is not at all compatible with i86. It is an entirely different instruction set and processor architecture.
Add to that dual or more processors and a new handheld device can be very competitive performance wise.
I'd rather see Apple extend the current Mobile OS to encompass the noted desires of the bulk of the users. That is the better move would be to implement copy and paste, a full BluTooth stack, a USB stack, printer support and whatever other components the developer world needs to deliver new unique products.
Of course that is one way to look at it. ATOM biggest advantage, or I should say its successors, is that eventually they will be 64 bit devices. At the rate of technology growth, 64 bit processors might be needed in handhelds a lot sooner than many may want to admit to. Some will dismiss this out of hand but lets face it on the desktop a 32 bit only environment will soon be a thing of the past. In the handheld environment the constraints are of course power draw, but RAM density is increasing quickly and there are alternatives on the horizon that might displace DRAM and SRAM. I see Atom as a long term solution if Apple is really looking that far out into the future. Even then Intel still has to deal with ATOMs significant power draw.
Dave
In a sense they do. It is all part of marketing to the engineering and product development crowd.
That should be a life time policy!
True!
The question is why would they want to do that. Right now they have a quickly developing alternative platform. It is a platform seeing a lot of developer interest and frankly has dumped a lot of legacy crap. It makes no sense to add on to it, just to support old apps.
In any event ARM is not at all compatible with i86. It is an entirely different instruction set and processor architecture.
There is nothing better than arm based on the watts required to accomplish a specific task. Yes that is a different performance metric than many like to deal with but is very valid in the portable market. In any event there is a whole new generation of ARM processors coming that will be surprisingly fast. This do to much higher clock rates and architecture improvements.
Add to that dual or more processors and a new handheld device can be very competitive performance wise.
This is certainly possible but do you really want to go in that direction because what you will end up with is a confused application environment with competing user interface components. I'm not saying this is impossible rather I'm not convinced the results will be acceptable.
I'd rather see Apple extend the current Mobile OS to encompass the noted desires of the bulk of the users. That is the better move would be to implement copy and paste, a full BluTooth stack, a USB stack, printer support and whatever other components the developer world needs to deliver new unique products.
Again this is very possible but is it a good thing? The thing is there is a vast difference in how the user uses a machine on the desktop and how a handheld is used. The gesture system on a desktop should make sense on the desktop, Apple already seems to be going in the right direction here.
That would not be very smart in my mind. The problem is ARM still beats the best that Intel can offer for low power devices even when those ARM systems are built on much older processes. Also no matter how small the ATOM is an ARM processors is smaller thus leading to low cost SoC implementations.
Of course that is one way to look at it. ATOM biggest advantage, or I should say its successors, is that eventually they will be 64 bit devices. At the rate of technology growth, 64 bit processors might be needed in handhelds a lot sooner than many may want to admit to. Some will dismiss this out of hand but lets face it on the desktop a 32 bit only environment will soon be a thing of the past. In the handheld environment the constraints are of course power draw, but RAM density is increasing quickly and there are alternatives on the horizon that might displace DRAM and SRAM. I see Atom as a long term solution if Apple is really looking that far out into the future. Even then Intel still has to deal with ATOMs significant power draw.
Dave