Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This is why Americans dont want to become the EU. The company making tge product should be able to control its distribution pipeline. Dont like don’t become an Apple distributor. Apple is not going to let you charge less than them for the product they make nor should they be expected to. Its just not realistic.
Price fixing is bad for all concerned except for those engaged in the fix. You're incorrect about Apple not letting companies charge less than them for their products. That couldn't be further from the truth... especially in the US. You'd be hard pressed not to find lower priced Apple products on the open market. Places like B&H, Adorama, Walmart, Best Buy, Microcenter, Amazon, etc. all sell Apple products at varying discounted prices. Moreover, the discounts on newly released products are starting to show up even quicker than years past.

Anecdotally, I've never purchased Apple products from an Apple store or site because I have always known the products could be purchased cheaper from other retailers. Chances are very good that you have done the same as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PC_tech
Price fixing is bad for all concerned except for those engaged in the fix. You're incorrect about Apple not letting companies charge less than them for their products. That couldn't be further from the truth... especially in the US. You'd be hard pressed not to find lower priced Apple products on the open market. Places like B&H, Adorama, Walmart, Best Buy, Microcenter, Amazon, etc. all sell Apple products at varying discounted prices. Moreover, the discounts on newly released products are starting to show up even quicker than years past.

Anecdotally, I've never purchased Apple products from an Apple store or site because I have always known the products could be purchased cheaper from other retailers. Chances are very good that you have done the same as well.

So can you not do the same in France????? Frankly the explanation from France as to why they were fining Apple is a joke. They essentially just stated what the accusations were. Ok, so how did they prevent distributors from competing with each other. Premium distributors could not risk promoting or lowering prices without risk ???? Yeah, its called capitalism. And, again, another accusation without even one fact to support it......Apple has abused the economic dependence of these Premium distributors on it, by subjecting them to unfair and unfavorable commercial conditions compared to its network of integrated distributors......yeah, I know what your accusing them of. How did they manage to accomplish this?????
Your coming out with a BILLION DOLLAR fine, you cant just regurgitate your accusations.
 
I suppose interest begins to run until the judgment is paid or Apple wins an appeal. The interest alone could be huge if Apple loses the appeal. I wonder if they can deposit the money now and avoid potential additional damages. (Receiving a refund if the appeal is successful.)
 
So can you not do the same in France????? Frankly the explanation from France as to why they were fining Apple is a joke. They essentially just stated what the accusations were. Ok, so how did they prevent distributors from competing with each other. Premium distributors could not risk promoting or lowering prices without risk ???? Yeah, its called capitalism. And, again, another accusation without even one fact to support it......Apple has abused the economic dependence of these Premium distributors on it, by subjecting them to unfair and unfavorable commercial conditions compared to its network of integrated distributors......yeah, I know what your accusing them of. How did they manage to accomplish this?????
Your coming out with a BILLION DOLLAR fine, you cant just regurgitate your accusations.
Bud, I have no idea what you're trying to say. I also don't think you really understand what you read in my comment. My comment isn't about France and Apple. My comment is a refutation of Adonis' claim that Apple doesn't allow companies to sell their products at a lower cost.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PC_tech
Apple know full well part of the premium product mystique is slapping on and maintaining a premium price. Too bad the maintaining part is illegal. Guess Apple will just have to put more premium into the product design rather than marketing.
 
WOW. I use to work for Ingram Micro back in 1996 as a PC computer Technician Level II for 2 YEARS. That seems like a LARGE fine for Ingram Micro. it was all Windows 95 machines for schools and Windows NT for corporation builds back in 1996. We did very little Mac work. mostly server builds and lots of workstations. HP was a huge part of our output. and some White Box builds with motherboard all the way up build.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Queen6
Rogue decisions have consequences. Apple would be better off learning this lesson and so would be other corpo-behemoths.
 
What is so wrong is fixing a company's retail price? Are Rolex retailers allowed to lower the retail price? Agreeing not to compete against each other is good for the distributers. What is so wrong about that? Do the French want to destroy it's businesses for the sake of a 10% discount?

If a country is so finicky, better to withdraw from that country. A country that wants its businesses to constantly live in a dog eat dog market is not worth doing business in. Oh, the stress of being a business in country like this.
 
I agree but what do they do with the collected fines? Do they give back to each consumer that bought an item at the fixed price? About the iPhone throttling fines, do they give back to every iPhone 6, 7, 8 etc owner that got affected or felt swayed to buy an upgraded phone they didn’t need?
Trying to get my head around these fines and how the money gets channeled around to the source or reason for the fine (competitors, consumers, researchers, etc)
I don't see this a share around for individual buyers :) this is Governments looking after their citizens, this cost money,

I suppose you could say it reduces your tax burden but maybe a better thought is a more deserving/emotive Government cause is not short changed to fund other departments overheads

Sure its not as obvious as the Government fining an oil company for spillage as costs re clean up etc as cost more obvious to the public

But it is a betterment for all in France and some compensation for those ripped off as at least the money goes to your fellow countryman, indirectly :)
 
Last edited:
“This is why Americans dont want to become the EU.”
This is why the EU dont want to become Americans. Same rules should apply for big and small. No price-fixing, goes against free trade and now against French law. Suppose more countries will follow.
 
...
for those ripped off as at least the money goes to your fellow countryman, indirectly :)
Who was ripped off? How do you even define ripped off?
[automerge]1584382529[/automerge]
“This is why Americans dont want to become the EU.”
This is why the EU dont want to become Americans. Same rules should apply for big and small. No price-fixing, goes against free trade and now against French law. Suppose more countries will follow.
Price fixing usually applies to independent companies agreeing to sell a product or service at a particular price point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Plutonius and SDJim
$1.2billion for aapl beating competition?
goes against free market theory
crazy man

A "Free market" with no rules is how we came to have kings, you know, the person who owned everything and everyon, and who was accountable to nobody.

Atleast in America, we decided kings weren't a very good idea.

So we created rules, which create structure within which capitalism can operate freely. This is Capitalism.

Capitalism is like a sport, where anyone can compete to win at the game. But you have to play by the rules of the game. Winning by stopping others from playing the game is strictly forbidden.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PC_tech
I agree but what do they do with the collected fines? Do they give back to each consumer that bought an item at the fixed price? About the iPhone throttling fines, do they give back to every iPhone 6, 7, 8 etc owner that got affected or felt swayed to buy an upgraded phone they didn’t need?
Trying to get my head around these fines and how the money gets channeled around to the source or reason for the fine (competitors, consumers, researchers, etc)
This is just a fine for not sticking to regulations so they won’t do it again.

same as if you get a speeding ticket. But that doesn’t mean your state gives it back to people injured from speeding cars...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.