I was excited about this camera initially, but if the x100 and the x-pro1 previews are any indication, it has both poor autofocus and poor manual focus (compared to its competitors). Sensor and lens quality mean nothing if there isn't a way to achieve reliable focus quickly.
How do they justify the huge price then?
Fuji is gunning for Leica with this system. Compared to Leica, it's a bargain (as are most things). If the lenses have good optics, they aren't unreasonably priced. The body seems too expensive for what it offers on paper, but specs don't cover things such as build quality, handling, aesthetic appeal, and other intangibles that contribute to the price target consumers are willing to pay for it.
@robbieduncan
The Fuji system is less expensive than the Leica M system, across the board. A quick glance at eBay/Google tells me that the used price of an M8 is around $2500
And that's where this seems to fail from what I've seen.
Still, I expect it to be very popular. Look at the mixed reviews on the X100 and it's strong sales. It is a sexy camera but one that I, too, probably can't justify picking up.
Still, I expect it to be very popular. Look at the mixed reviews on the X100 and it's strong sales. It is a sexy camera but one that I, too, probably can't justify picking up.