The packet is already in the legal department getting looked over by the lawyers right now.
It's pretty nice and I've been hoping for this...but I just asked myself this; what makes it any better? You will still have to pay for a plan on T-Mobile and I don't think their data plan comes cheap. You'll also probably have to sign up for a contract with them. I know it would be great for people on T-MObile cause now they could have iPhone. But...carriers are all pretty much the same. Data and text is expensive...**** so are minutes! It's not like T-Mobile has a 39.99 unlimited data and 500 minutes a month plan.
I'll do some homework and see how beneficial it is. I am definitely happy they broke this though. I think the only thing Apple will care about is that they don't get a cut from the contracts on T-Mobile. It's too bad iPhone wasn't compatible with all carriers.
I suppose this is a stupid question, but is G3 a hardware or software thing? What I'm getting at is, if I can use another carrier that has a G3 network, will the current iPhones benefit from that?
You don't think they predicted this happening from the get go? Apple and at&t already have a plan on how to handle this.![]()
It will be very interesting to see if Apple Legal puts a stop on this...and if so, on what legal grounds.
The only people I never hear complaining about their carrier are Verizon customers...
The iPhone should have never be locked up in the first place.
Consumers pay full price for a phone.. and *still* be told what cell networks they can / can't use.
This application should be welcome. Consumer freedom.
My friend recently switched to T-mobile from AT&T because she got poor reception where she lives. Her reception isn't any better and her phone bill went from about $80 to over $200. She called them and they allowed her to switch plans which brought it down to $120. Ouch.
That's just one customer, but it highlights the point that all the carriers have their problems. The only people I never hear complaining about their carrier are Verizon customers, but none of them seem to know that Verizon disables features on their phones (did that Bluetooth class action suit ever get resolved?) so I don't know if I really trust their judgment.
It's pretty nice and I've been hoping for this...but I just asked myself this; what makes it any better? You will still have to pay for a plan on T-Mobile and I don't think their data plan comes cheap. You'll also probably have to sign up for a contract with them. I know it would be great for people on T-MObile cause now they could have iPhone. But...carriers are all pretty much the same. Data and text is expensive...**** so are minutes! It's not like T-Mobile has a 39.99 unlimited data and 500 minutes a month plan.
I'll do some homework and see how beneficial it is. I am definitely happy they broke this though. I think the only thing Apple will care about is that they don't get a cut from the contracts on T-Mobile. It's too bad iPhone wasn't compatible with all carriers.
But the unfortunate reality is - they are all the same. I never used T-Mobile or Spirint so can't speak for them, but the people I know that are with Verizon all say the same thing: "they're a terrible company, but you can't beat their coverage." What a sad state of affairs.
Consumers pay full price for a phone.. and *still* be told what cell networks they can / can't use.
To misquote Kent Brockman, "I've said it before and I'll say it again, capitalism just doesn't work."
The iPhone should have never be locked up in the first place.
Consumers pay full price for a phone.. and *still* be told what cell networks they can / can't use.
This application should be welcome. Consumer freedom.
The Original Story said:For U.S. customers, this limits you to simply switching to T-Mobile from AT&T