Isn't it amazing how fast technology has improved in the last 30 years?
I meant size of battery doesn't automatically drive likelihood of battery exploding. If Apple inserted a bigger battery in anything, it doesn't automatically make that thing more likely to explode. That thing will just have a bigger battery and hopefully longer battery life compared to the very same thing with a smaller battery.
technology did improve, but no new technology came into use.Isn't it amazing how fast technology has improved in the last 30 years?
You say this as if newer SoCs don’t ALSO get more energy efficient.
Based on the past choices by Apple, your wish is much more likely than mine.
But you take no comparable offense and/or see no issue with someone posting that if Apple had chosen to put a bigger battery in the hypothetical iPhone 6 that started this sidebar, that would automatically mean it would be more likely to explode... that bigger battery = bomb?
Some others have tried on the past . And they have exploded. Following year the have decreased the size. A year later they have regained their confidence.
Apple plays safe!
Adding bigger batteries does not result in explosions, that's just poor engineering or using faulty parts.Some others have tried on the past . And they have exploded. Following year the have decreased the size. A year later they have regained their confidence.
Apple plays safe!
Heat is the enemy of li batteries. Quick charging results in heat, which is probably why apple doesn't want to include it. With apple, it's not about them being able to accomplish something, everything they do is planned (secretly).Well, certainly iPhone's and iPad's stand to require significant improvements in battery life, but dismayed that these fixes are always "just around the corner" and each new generation of product doesn't seem to focus on the problem.
I would be much more happy in the short term if Apple could just support a proper 20-30 minute quick full charge cycle instead of the 2+ hours it takes to charge their phones and iPad's today, then I wouldn't mind seeing the battery life warning so much if I new I could get to at least 50% after just a coffee break.
Apple (and others) have patented water resistant speakers years ago so those holes do not allow water to penetrate. Headphone jacks are a standard that goes back 75 years so there is never a waterproofing provision unless you alter the jack design. Then you risk excluding some analog jacks. More reason why it was smart for them to drop that old standard.Don't be fooled. They very likely know that to be true. We'll just make up spin to try to help rationalize corporate decisions... like the key to waterproofing a phone is getting rid of a headphone jack hole (spun almost every time) while ignoring the larger rectangular hole just millimeters away and the rows of smaller round (speaker) holes also nearby... as if water is prejudiced to only sneak in though a headphone jack hole.
I have a car battery in my car that is thicker than all of my mobile devices batteries from all the time there's been mobile devices COMBINED. It never explodes.
There are people with solar panel battery arrays made up of upwards of dozens of car battery-sized batteries or bigger batteries. They pretty much never explode either.
It's likely that Apple themselves USED to use bigger batteries in prior generations of these very devices. They pretty much never exploded.
They thinned the battery because "thinner" batteries support "thinner" marketing spin... and less battery costs less per unit. Now they've "thinner"ed so much that the camera module sticks out (because the laws of physics can't be thinned). We are to like it because that is what a corporation has chosen to make. Some of us will write down anything to rationalize it because that corporation is always right.
Adding bigger batteries does not result in explosions, that's just poor engineering or using faulty parts.
If that were true, our laptops and tablets would be a fiery mess..
And I’m saying if Apple added a bigger battery to their design, it wouldn’t result in a device that’s more dangerous. You directly implied this in your post. It’s incorrect.Yeah, nah...not so fast.
Is adding large battery on a small hardware that represent engeeniering challenge. I did not say it is impossible or that it haven’t been done, just said Apple tend to play safe and take its time on this. And so they should.
Fast charging destroys your battery. You’ll just end up having to charge more frequently because it won’t hold as much of a charge.Well, certainly iPhone's and iPad's stand to require significant improvements in battery life, but dismayed that these fixes are always "just around the corner" and each new generation of product doesn't seem to focus on the problem.
I would be much more happy in the short term if Apple could just support a proper 20-30 minute quick full charge cycle instead of the 2+ hours it takes to charge their phones and iPad's today, then I wouldn't mind seeing the battery life warning so much if I new I could get to at least 50% after just a coffee break.
Isn't it amazing how fast technology has improved in the last 30 years?
There are plenty of laptops that "blow up" all over the world. You just don't hear about them because there is about 1 laptop for every 1000 iPhones. In fact, it's the reason we cannot check laptops in with our baggage anymore on most flights.My car IS a hybrid, using a bigger battery than in an iPhone. I have zero concept that I'm driving around inside of a mobile bomb.
But the point was that bigger battery size does not automatically equal bomb. No need to get lost in the details. If it helps: MBp has more battery than the iPhones but MBp's are not blowing up all around the world.
The original guy basically argued for smaller batteries because bigger batteries would explode. I countered that size of battery does not automatically = explosion. Apple could certainly put a larger battery into iPhone- as is strongly rumored with the next generation of iPhones- and that won't automatically make bigger-battery iPhones into bombs. Else, if that rumor proves to be true, no-one should buy a new iPhone- I mean Apple bomb- this Fall.
Nice, the US website states the same.Seems that LPTO tech found its way in Apple Watch Series 4. At least the compare sheet on the German Apple website states that the Series 4 offers "LTPO OLED Retina Display mit Force Touch".![]()