a lot of those games don't specify if they'll work with lion. I guess Im going to just downgrade to snow leopard. although Ill probably have to re load all my filesso tired of os x kitten holding me back from using software
Ive tried the following: Starcraft 1 and 2, Command and Conquer Generals, Age of Empires 3, Warcraft 3, Civilaztion 5 and none of them have worked. I guess putting windows on my mac is the next step. I haven't used windows in so long I don't even know what the current version is. So I just a buy a copy of windows and run bootcamp right?
Ive tried the following: Starcraft 1 and 2, Command and Conquer Generals, Age of Empires 3, Warcraft 3, Civilaztion 5 and none of them have worked. I guess putting windows on my mac is the next step. I haven't used windows in so long I don't even know what the current version is. So I just a buy a copy of windows and run bootcamp right?
All current Blizzard games should run fine (starcraft 2, diablo 3, wow), all current valve games should run fine (portal 2, left 4 dead 2, Team fortress 2 (free by the way),etc). Stuff from Aspyr and Ferral available in the app store should work fine though some ports are crappy (civ 5 for example, though recent patches were suppose to improve things). Starcraft 1 won't work.Ive tried the following: Starcraft 1 and 2, Command and Conquer Generals, Age of Empires 3, Warcraft 3, Civilaztion 5 and none of them have worked. I guess putting windows on my mac is the next step. I haven't used windows in so long I don't even know what the current version is. So I just a buy a copy of windows and run bootcamp right?
Starcraft may be too old, Starcraft 2 says it works under Lion. I've played the demos of AoE3 and CivIV. They worked great, although I didn't care for CivIV.
What Mac do you have? What issues were you having?
Blizzard games all rely on Battle.net. That being said, if you have a valid Battle.net account, and you have valid product keys, you can download Mac specific clients for ANYTHING BLIZZARD MAKES. Compatibility problems solved, to the highest order. I bought StarCraft when it first hit the shelves back in 1998. When I got my nice shiny new iMac in 2010, I logged onto Battle.net, put in my StarCraft product key, Bam! Starcraft and Broodwars, OS X client, downloaded, installed, runs better than ever. Same went for WarCraft III and it's expansion.![]()
Unfortunately, starcraft 1 and brood wars are PPC apps, and since lion doesn't support Rosetta, they won't work. While Warcraft 3 has been patched to support intel, the installer is PPC so it won't install on lion.
Good luck with that. There are a crapload of games that work in Lion. Games are being supported more than ever on the Mac platform. I fail to see how downgrading your OS is going to solve your problem unless you want to play PPC games, which still may or may not work or work well under Snow Leopard. There are a plethora of games on Windows as well that you can simply access by using Boot Camp. There are options.
what about D2?Blizzard games all rely on Battle.net. That being said, if you have a valid Battle.net account, and you have valid product keys, you can download Mac specific clients for ANYTHING BLIZZARD MAKES. Compatibility problems solved, to the highest order. I bought StarCraft when it first hit the shelves back in 1998. When I got my nice shiny new iMac in 2010, I logged onto Battle.net, put in my StarCraft product key, Bam! Starcraft and Broodwars, OS X client, downloaded, installed, runs better than ever. Same went for WarCraft III and it's expansion.![]()
it's a no-go with diablo 2.
----------
what about D2?
.
Well, at least WarCraft III still works . . .
I think it was a conspiracy to make everyone upgrade from Microsoft Office 2004Well, after my recent upgrade to Lion, I have taken stock of all the software I have collected on my Mac for the last two years, and have come to the conclusion that I can run just about everything made for any system, OS, or game console that I could on Snow Leopard. Except for software made for the PowerPC macs.
So, to be clear, on my Mac, I can run old DOS, Windows, Nintendo, Sega, Atari, and Commodore programs fine. I just can't run old Mac programs. On my Mac.
It would be pointless to ask why, but I can't resist.
Why? Everything ran fine under Snow Leopard. What was the give that resulted in this take?
Windows is designed to be virtualised and old console games are simplistic enough to emulate (remember than emulators are coded by hobbyists, not corporations). Comparing both of those to Rosetta doesn't really fit.So, to be clear, on my Mac, I can run old DOS, Windows, Nintendo, Sega, Atari, and Commodore programs fine. I just can't run old Mac programs. On my Mac.
It would be pointless to ask why, but I can't resist.
Rosetta requires a lot of resources just to keep it running on the latest version of OS X, clearly Apple didn't think it's worth it any more. It was a stop-gap product anyway. They also probably wanted to ween less-informed customers off programs running under emulation when native binaries may already exist.Why? Everything ran fine under Snow Leopard. What was the give that resulted in this take?
Windows is designed to be virtualised and old console games are simplistic enough to emulate (remember than emulators are coded by hobbyists, not corporations). Comparing both of those to Rosetta doesn't really fit.
Rosetta requires a lot of resources just to keep it running on the latest version of OS X, clearly Apple didn't think it's worth it any more. It was a stop-gap product anyway. They also probably wanted to ween less-informed customers off programs running under emulation when native binaries may already exist.
Yeah, I'm over it. Just kinda shocked when stuff that used to work on this computer no longer work on this computer because I did an incremental OS upgrade. Like taking my truck into a Ford dealer for a recall installation then being told I'm no longer permitted to drive on I-95. What?
And as far as the 'resources' for Rosetta . . . these programs, when they were written, didn't have the error message "Can't run because PowerPC apps no longer supported' coded into them. That means that the current OS is making the determination when attempting to launch the binary, then displaying the error. Meaning, that instead of displaying an error, the OS could launch a virtual machine under the hood capable of supporting the environment, that would cease when the program closed. No burden, no extra 'resources' being used.
Because I like I-95.
Did you ever use Rosetta? Granted, my experience was on a 2006 CD MB, but when I would use an app that required it my fans and CPU would always max out. Compared to playing a universal binary game CPU would be at 50-60%. It's a lot more taxing on the OS and takes a lot of usability away from other things.
it's a no-go with diablo 2.
what about D2?
...Rosetta requires a lot of resources just to keep it running on the latest version of OS X, clearly Apple didn't think it's worth it any more. It was a stop-gap product anyway. They also probably wanted to ween less-informed customers off programs running under emulation when native binaries may already exist.