Gaming on retina MBPs?

Discussion in 'MacBook Pro' started by Yixian, May 17, 2013.

Most Liked Posts
  1. Yixian, May 17, 2013

    Yixian macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2007
    Location:
    Europe
    #1
    I'm a bit out of the loop, I used to be a MBP user for many years but I bought an Air for work and it was so convenient it eventually replaced my Pro.

    The one thing my Air can't do is game, but for the years I was an MBP user... neither could they. Yeah maybe the odd game would run alright if you bootcamped, but by and large each update was a massive disappointment with the graphics card a distant afterthought.. Sometimes even seemed like an insult when you're paying top dollar and getting the cheapest option when better cards were available at the same wattage and size.

    Now that we have retina Pros, I can only imagine that gaming (current games) in native resolution is essentially a joke, so how do they look scaled down, and have the Pros caught up a little in terms of GPUs? In other words, are the cards in the Pros these days relatively better than the 8600M and 9600M were for their time?
     
    share
    + Quote Reply
  2. B..., May 17, 2013

    B... macrumors 68000

    B...

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2013
    #2
    The 950M is a very good card, unless you want to play Crysis 3 at 2880x1800. They work well at 1440x900 on medium-high settings for the most part. The chip is a high-end mid-range to low-end enthusiast range GPU.
     
    share
    + Quote Reply
  3. Yixian, May 19, 2013

    Yixian thread starter macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2007
    Location:
    Europe
    #3
    What's the current thinking on the GPUs in the coming updates?
     
    share
    + Quote Reply
  4. jeblis, May 19, 2013

    jeblis macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2012
    #4
    Much better integrated gpu performance. Discrete about the same (nvidia 750 is essentially a rebranded 650). Since the discrete is the powerhouse for games, expect similar 3D performance this year.
     
    share
    + Quote Reply
  5. Erasmus, May 20, 2013

    Erasmus macrumors 68030

    Erasmus

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Location:
    Hiding from Omnius in Australia
    #5
    The 650M draws around twice the power as the 8600M/9600M, at ~45-50W, rather than ~23W. So yes, it is vastly better, even relative to other GPUs of their respective generations.

    If the new MBP gets the 750M, it will probably be a modest update of ~15%. If Apple try and put a 8870M in it (which has a comparable TDP) the performance improvement may be more like 30%.
     
    share
    + Quote Reply
  6. rockyroad55, May 20, 2013

    rockyroad55 macrumors 601

    rockyroad55

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2010
    Location:
    Phila, PA
    #6
    I played BF3 without overclocking at medium settings with an average of about 45-50fps on the 15 base retina.
     
    share
    + Quote Reply
  7. swerve147, May 20, 2013

    swerve147 macrumors 6502a

    swerve147

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2013
    #7
    You'd be surprised at how decent games look scaled down on a Retina display. It must be the extra pixels. It's definitely not something like scaling resolution down to 1440x900 on a 1920x1200 panel, i.e. it's a lot better than what you've seen in the past.

    At what resolution?
     
    share
    + Quote Reply
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)

Share This Page