GeForce 9400M vs Broadwell HD Graphics

Discussion in 'Mac and PC Games' started by Bibiboobi, May 14, 2016.

  1. Bibiboobi macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    May 14, 2016
    #1
    I currently have a 2008 unibody Macbook, 2.0 Core 2 Duo with 9400M. Simply put it sucks and always has sucked at gaming.

    I've recently purchased a Celeron 3825u with integrated Broadwell graphics due to my mac ageing and unfortunately I have to wait until graduation till I can afford another one :(

    Does anyone know how the 3825u compares to the 9400M? I'm not expecting it to play anything new or anything in high quality but I'd at least like to play a few older games, such as Civ 5. I haven't received it yet but I didn't want to open it if it's going to perform really bad...
     
  2. saturnotaku macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2013
    #2
    Civ 5 is not that old a game, and it's not going to run well. You'd be lucky to see 30 fps at 1024x768 and low settings. The 9400M would be worse.
     

Share This Page