Well it was a couple
Of days ago when he was still alive.
Simple. There was a delay in making the general announcement.
Well it was a couple
Of days ago when he was still alive.
You think they delayed the announcement and then when they did announce it, they lied about when it happened?Simple. There was a delay in making the general announcement.
Strange that you decided to concentrate on the title and a few posts instead of the majority of the posts that do acknowledge the great loss because you think people are drying to distract from his death.Candidly, the thread title - which is missing the point that a gifted artist and wonderful man being has died - and this discussion about the exact time his death occurred merely serve to detract from the possibility of having a discussion to acknowledge a warm, decent and generous human being, a man who was brave both as an artist and as a person, and who deserves far better than this - rather trite - distraction.
Strange that you decided to concentrate on the title and a few posts instead of the majority of the posts that do acknowledge the great loss because you think people are drying to distract from his death.
It doesn't bother me what people decide to talk about in threads (as long as it is close to being on topic), it struck me as odd that, once again, someone died just a few days after a death hoax. I changed the title.I have already commented on the tragic passing of a gifted and generous artist and a brave and decent man.
But, the thread title is misleading, - and frankly, poorly phrased - and seems to invite discussion of the time - and perhaps - manner of George Michael's death, rather than acknowledging and celebrating his life, which I have already done over a number of posts.
As the OP, it does lie open to you to amend it, if this is what you wish to make clear you would prefer to have stressed.
It doesn't bother me what people decide to talk about in threads (as long as it is close to being on topic), it struck me as odd that, once again, someone died just a few days after a death hoax. I changed the title.
You think they delayed the announcement and then when they did announce it, they lied about when it happened?
Why would I think that?
Really? You said that the Death hoax was true all along. That they just delayed the announcement. But the hoax was days before he died. And when they announced his death, they said he died that day. So for the hoax to be true, they would have had to lie about the day of his death.Why would I think that?
He was found by his partner on xmas day.Really? You said that the Death hoax was true all along. That they just delayed the announcement. But the hoax was days before he died. And when they announced his death, they said he died that day. So for the hoax to be true, they would have had to lie about the day of his death.
Really? You said that the Death hoax was true all along. That they just delayed the announcement. But the hoax was days before he died. And when they announced his death, they said he died that day. So for the hoax to be true, they would have had to lie about the day of his death.
Because this is about all you have been writing about on this thread.
Is there anything you might care to add about George Michael, the man, artist, songwriter, generous soul and courageous individual?
So, what was the date of the "hoax"?
I am sorry? I beg your pardon? I made a valid, topical comment. I have the right to do that. If somebody else - yourself, for instance - wishes to wax lyrically about the person that is up to them. I think that if you look carefully at this thread you will see quite clearly that the majority of comments are not, as you say, eulogising Mr. Micheal. That is not to say that he does or does not deserve such treatment, of course, nor that I myself have any opinion either way on the matter.
That being said, there is no denying that he was a fine artist and is admired by many. However there is also the personal side of him away from performing where we saw him commit gross indecency upon an off-duty policeman in a public lavatory whilst under the influence of drugs and extreme homosexual lust, where he crashed his car into a photography shop in a busy London high street, where he "fell" out of his own vehicle on a busy express road, where he suffered mentally and emotionally in coming to terms with his fame and changes in his public social life, etc., etc. So there is a balance necessary in the final analysis, and who are we, anyway, to make any valid analysis of a person's life? We may see some particular external features that either attract or repulse us, that we either admire or abhor. Who are we to say that he "deserved better" or "deserved more"? Each one enjoys and suffers according to the reactions to his own activity (this is termed 'karma', you can research it at will), and the laws of nature and in turn karma are far beyond our power to intervene, change, demand, order or question. If one understood these matters more deeply he would know that each one deserved/deserves exactly what they get, got and will get in the future, either in this life or the next.
What was the cause of death?
What a load of Homophobic nonsense ...Complications due to AIDS resulting in heart failure - if you want the whole cause.
What an appalling and false thing to say! Where the hell did AIDS come from?Complications due to AIDS resulting in heart failure - if you want the whole cause.
Apparently, Dr. Thewitt possesses the extraordinary power to determine cause of death remotely. He's been weighing in on the Carrie Fisher thread as well.What an appalling and false thing to say! Where the hell did AIDS come from?
Apparently, Dr. Thewitt possesses the extraordinary power to determine cause of death remotely. He's been weighing in on the Carrie Fisher thread as well.
The only factually correct aspect of this despicable allegation is that HIV is a cardiac risk factor, due to both the infection itself as well as side effects of the antiretrovirals used to treat it. However, there is no evidence that Mr. Michael was HIV-positive, so to suggest that this had something to do with his untimely death is patently irresponsible. Downright slanderous, actually.
Complications due to AIDS resulting in heart failure - if you want the whole cause.
A full reply to this post would probably banish, or perhaps merely consign, this thread to the dark depths of PRSI.
That said, however, it does strike me that your post appears to give the impression that you may have what are quaintly termed "issues" with the open expression of gay sexual desire.