But at least Amanda Bywhateverherlastname is is hot (when not dressed as a guy at least...and don't call me a pedophile for thinking someone that young is hot...according to her birthday on IMDB, she's less than 2 weeks younger than me. Fair game ). Same can't be said about Samuel L. Jackson (well, I guess some will disagree)n-abounds said:"She's The Man" looks much worse. The trailer on iTunes is ridiculous.
richardjames said:You would think that Samuel L Jackson would be able to find a better film than this to appear in.
It doesn't even have a good name!
If someone sent me a script called "Snakes on a Plane" I think it would go straight in the bin.
And how many snakes are there going to be? You would think they would notice thousands of snakes before takeoff.
Yeah, I read something that said Samuel L Jackson only wanted to do it because he enjoys making all sorts of movies, including dumb ones. He said he doesn't have to make a "classic" every time. He wants it to have an "It looks so bad, it MUST be good" vibe, and while "Snakes on a Plane" was pretty much the working title, he wanted to keep it. C'mon......snakes on a plane.......that title just GRABS you. He also wanted to add more swearing so it would be more bad-ass.MattG said:That's actually why he's doing the movie...he's been quoted as saying he did the movie because of the title, and that he was adamant about them not changing it.
So, that single line is enough to bump a movie from PG-13 to R?pseudobrit said:I saw a bit on this film on CNN a few weeks back.
A fan blog put up a piece of invented dialogue for Jackson "there are mother****ing snakes on the mother****ing plane!!" and the studio went back in and added the line to the movie (the film of course loses its PG-13). That's freaking awesome.
Then they showed a clip and it just looked so hilarious I laughed out loud in a room by myself. It's very rare that I laugh by myself.
That's the beauty of it, though.Oryan said:I can't help but laugh at how stupid that movie looks.