This is why I prefer carburetors over fuel injection easy repair, easy tuning, less moving parts, less mechanical problems.
Wait, so rebuilding a carb is easier than replacing a borked injector? And changing the jets is easier than
plugging a laptop into my car? Do you even know how many moving parts a fuel injector has?* And just how often do you have to rebuild or clean out your carb? Fuel injection now beats carburetors in everything: efficiency, power, reliability, cost, adaptability to changing conditions in, and demands on, the engine. You remind me of a guy who used to frequent a Subaru forum, who was absolutely convinced that: the Subaru EA series motors (3
main bearings, air-cooled, almost all of them carbureted), could produce more power, were more efficient, and were more reliable than the EJ series (5 main bearings, liquid-cooled, fuel-injected), engines. Guess what engine series is in the STI?
meh, i've heard of many imports running for over 200k
And how many of them were Mitsubishis? Not many I bet.
That would be a better choice than the Eclipse.
*: 2
EDIT: I just did some searching. The 2000 Eclipse GT has a 9.0:1 compression ratio, so you could probably get away with 89. My car's compression is over 10.0:1 and Subaru recommends regular. However, a few guys have logged then engine, and found that it runs better on premium.
P.S. In my searching, I found that the
engine in the 2000-05 Eclipse was also in my father's 93 Caravan.

It actually moved that thing along pretty well.