Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
No, GM had always stated that the Two Mode was going into the Trucks/SUVS as that is where they could gain the most with the first generation, as can be seen by a Hybrid Tahoe getting better city milage than a Camry, you do the math on the weight difference.

Actually, if you were informed you would know that the two mode system was on city buses before it even got to the trucks/suvs. GM started by trying to make the most inefficent vehicles more efficent, than taking the easy way and making a small light car more efficent.

Also of note, there was never any official statement of the exact cost of putting the Two Mode into a vehicle but the closest we got that I saw was Bob Lutz indicating it would cost about the same as a small car, so roughly $10k. Which means that putting the system into vehicles other than high end full size SUVs did not make too much financial sense, as unless GM wanted to give up $5-8k per vehicle in subsidies to make the system a $2-5k premium over another model the demand would not be there in gen one vehicles as the excess cost would take too long too recover in gas savings over the life of the vehicles, If you could recover that kind of money over 3-5 years when say you have a Malibu already getting pretty good mileage, the returns diminish the more efficent the vehicle already is.

You will of course note that Toyota is inuable to use the Hybrid Synergy Drive on anything larger than a Highlander as the the weight of the vehicles makes their system useless. Or as you would put it...

"Toyota was too stupid to impliment their hybrid system on a medium SUV".

Then again Toyota was poo pooing the Chevrolet Volt because the battery system wouldnt work etc, when in fact Toyota had a heavy financial (production plant) interest in the batteries it uses for the HSD, so it had no interest in seeing the Volt working as it would make the HSD setup irrelevent. Then, once the Volt actually started progressing and GM was actively testing muels and getting the expected range Toyota suddenly changed its tune and cried ME TOO!!!!!! and decided to preannounce (vapourware) a Prius or similar with a similar setup to the Volt. Oh me oh my!

Hybrid wise GM was slow to the party, then once it arrived and had the product it wasn't financially in a position to get the technology into all the vehicles. Toyota tooks years to get the Prius into a position where a vehicle sold with a profit, yet even then it might take a while longer to call it truely profitable since so few people want to buy one now that gas prices dropped.

Oh I know the Two mode was in their buses. And I am not criticizing GM for putting the Two Mode in the SUV's first. I am saying they were stupid to engineer the Two Mode to only fit in the SUV's/trucks. BAS sucks and that much you should be able to admit. The Malibu hybrid only gets 1 MPG improvement over the regular one with the 4 banger/6 speed combo. I hope BAS+ is a major improvement that can make it rival the Camry and Fusion hybrid.

I am on GM's side. I have an Aura XR and I love it and I am eyeing a Camaro SS in the future. But, I can not excuse GM on their mistakes.
 
GM started by trying to make the most inefficent vehicles more efficent, than taking the easy way and making a small light car more efficent.
Mathematically, sure, a few mpg improvement on a very in efficient vehicle would give you the best gas savings. However, people who buy such big SUVs tend not to care about that sort of things unless gas prices are very high. That's probably why I've seen maybe one hybrid Tahoe in the last few years compared to dozens of Prius cars every day.

Then, once the Volt actually started progressing and GM was actively testing muels and getting the expected range Toyota suddenly changed its tune and cried ME TOO!!!!!! and decided to preannounce (vapourware) a Prius or similar with a similar setup to the Volt. Oh me oh my!
You are underestimating marketing aspects again. Toyota was trying very hard to avoid plug-in discussions, because early on they were getting boatloads of consumers who were asking how they were supposed to charge it if they get a Prius. Toyota was very smart in avoiding a marketing muddle until most potential customers understood the basic hybrid concept. Besides, until Volt is actually on sale it is vaporware as well.
 
Oh I know the Two mode was in their buses. And I am not criticizing GM for putting the Two Mode in the SUV's first. I am saying they were stupid to engineer the Two Mode to only fit in the SUV's/trucks. BAS sucks and that much you should be able to admit. The Malibu hybrid only gets 1 MPG improvement over the regular one with the 4 banger/6 speed combo. I hope BAS+ is a major improvement that can make it rival the Camry and Fusion hybrid.

I am on GM's side. I have an Aura XR and I love it and I am eyeing a Camaro SS in the future. But, I can not excuse GM on their mistakes.

The two mode fits, it is the cost that prevents it from fitting. the only cars that remotely come close cost wise to fitting the tgwo mode are the Corvette (all models), the STS and maybe the high end CTS models. If the cost to GM was in the $5k range they could throw it at a lot more, but with the first gen being $10k or more it just added way too much cost to almost every car in the line up for what is at the car level not enough gain.

Also, don't forget who GM worked with to get the Two Mode system, Daimler Chrysler (at the time) & BMW. They could certainly drop the technology into a lot of cars and people would be more comfortable paying the premium.

Good to see you have your eye on GM product, too many people are stuck in the 70s & 80s when it comes to their opinions of the Detroit 3. Though I will say that Chrysler could do with some interior upgrades, I was tempted to consider a Charger or 300C instead of the 9-3, I checked them out online, saw the interiors and didn't even go to a dealer.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.