Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
If you read the article you will notice that they credit the source to Pravda. I'm not sure how many of you have actually seen the Russian "news" source called Pravda but it is one of the biggest purveyors of crap I have ever seen.

Judge for yourslef: http://english.pravda.ru/science/
 
Originally posted by eclipse525
Hence your anwser.

Think outside the box. Think potential and not limitations. The capacity is there but we haven't develop to that point yet BUT it will. Unfortuneately not in our lifetime. The beautiful thing is that there some exceptional people that come along every once in a while that kinda give us a glimpse of our potential.


~e

You miss the point.

There's a reason we don't use our whole brain at once. Nature doesn't build in a giant potential waste of space just waiting to be used. The statistic is meaningless. And you don't need it to boost the idea that we can evolve new abilities. Most anything can happen. But it's a lot more believable when it falls within the laws of the universe we know. Anything else is purely speculative. By definition.

Potential is personal. There is no species potential as we have nothing to measure it as falling less to. There will always be (and always have been) those standouts who take humanity to new hights, but they're hardly evolutionary jumps, just wonderful bright spots that seldom pass what kept them above the crowd onto their progeny in any discernible form.

As far as your viewpoint is concerned (what you see in your lifetime), humans won't "change" or "evolve" in any way that you can measure. They haven't really changed in 30,000 years other than by what proper and abundant diet can provide, coupled with a comparatively sedentary lifestyle, and those changes can happen within a generation. Look how much larger 2nd generations of Asian Americans are than their grandparents were at their age. They didn't "evolve" into bigger specimens.

Dreams and Sci-fi are fun and can serve as great inspiration, but it's not until the Sci-fi gets to drop the "fi" is it anything that's more than a killer concept or story with potential.

This story is tripe.
 
Originally posted by eclipse525
Hence your anwser.

Think outside the box. Think potential and not limitations. The capacity is there but we haven't develop to that point yet BUT it will. Unfortuneately not in our lifetime. The beautiful thing is that there some exceptional people that come along every once in a while that kinda give us a glimpse of our potential.
~e

The brain is an awesome creation. How many transistors in our favorite processors? 50 million or so. How many neurons in our brain?

100 billion. And each neuron connects to 1,000 to 10,000 other neurons. And there are another 5 trillion cells in there that help shape the way the neurons communicate. So it is capable of a lot.

But that article is pure junk. Weekly World News quality. No doubt about it. It is interesting to wonder if such a power would be remotely possible.

We marvel at the way dogs smell, and we could be that good at smelling with just a few changes. Dogs added that ability (or we lost it) in probably a fe hundred thousand years. Bees see the flower colors in the "non-visible" spectrum (UV? Infra-red? one of them). No reason why we couldn't. We have 3 color receptors in our eyes. Some animals have two. So we have "super powers" of vision in comparison with them. X-rays are just farther down the radiation spectrum. But it wouldn't be that useful to "see" x-rays unless you could convince people to walk in front of an x-ray source you lug around! And the high energy of the X-ray probably means that it couldn't interact with the photo receptor in your eye since it would just destroy any protein it hit rather than be captured by it, like visible spectrum light is with our eyes.

So even if our brains had untapped potential, it doesn't matter if there are physical constraints on how what we are made of interacts with the world.

OK, so I'm going on a bit long here. Just wanted to share one other cool factoid about color vision. There are some subtle differences in the three color receptors. So if I have two copies of Green-A, then I may see green a little differently from someone who is Green-B or someone that is Green-A/B. Some women already have "super" color perception, because they inactivate one of their two X chromosomes in each cell at random. So they may have one cell that is Green-A and one that is Green-B.. meaing that they will be especially acute at both those wavelengths while other women and all men will only see part of that spectrum well.
 
Originally posted by Doctor Q
What is the scientific explanation for how Superman does it?

Because of his non-human parents.

Come on, follow the story line, pplleeeasse.

Originally posted by Durandal7
If you read the article you will notice that they credit the source to Pravda. I'm not sure how many of you have actually seen the Russian "news" source called Pravda but it is one of the biggest purveyors of crap I have ever seen.

Judge for yourslef: http://english.pravda.ru/science/
UFO's... Joan of Arc wasn't killed by the English... and the girl with x-ray vision all on one page... where is the national enquirer?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.