~Shard~ said:
Well since you're just guessing as well I don't see what the big deal is... 😛
Well I think the difference here is that I'm trying to use the evidence from Apple's past activity to predict their future activity, which isn't so much guessing, more estimating! Your opinions, though equally valid as opinions, don't seem to me to be based on much evidence... but anyway, as you say, we'll both have to wait and see, so I'm not baiting you here, just stating my POV!
As for some specific response to your comments... Apple hardly *ever* just give a 'small speed bump to one of the machines in the PowerMac line and do nothing else'? The only time I can think they did this is when they changed the single 1.8 to a dual 1.8.
Unless of course you are referring to when Apple introduce a *new* top of the line machine, and shift the previously 'better' and 'best' models down to 'good' and 'better' levels, maintaining the old price structure, in which case we are talking about the same thing, e.g. going from 1.8, 2 and 2.5 GHZ to 2, 2.5 and 2.8GHZ.
The other thing is, with the next speed bump it is more than likely that we will see important 'under the hood' changes in architecture, for instance going to PCI Express.
Lastly, when you say that after they introduce new models, there is always a dearth of availability, this is only really true for top of the line machines. The low end PowerMacs are nearly always available - I mean, if they can supply 2GHZ PowerMacs today at the 'better' level, they should be able to provide them in January at the 'good' level.
I think the thing here is, I (and others) are not looking to get the top of the line machine (2.5 or perhaps 2.8 in January), in which case your availability argument would be absolutely correct. Actually though I'm looking for the best value PowerMac G5 (not the iMac before anyone says that). Right now, the best value PowerMac G5 is the 1.8GHZ... but if I wait until January, it is likely that for the same price I would pay today, I could get a 2GHZ machine, with the latest internal architecture, for the same price.
OBVIOUSLY the flaw in this argument is that you can *always* wait for a better machine, but given the evidence, I am prepared to hold out for the next revision... but that's just me!
😀