Good use of lens flare?

Discussion in 'Digital Photography' started by alt75, Sep 26, 2010.

  1. alt75 macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2007
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    #1
    Hi, I took this picture in Botswana recently. I quite like the flare in the picture, but did wonder whether the spot right on the elephant was distracting. I showed the photo to a couple of workmates, not photographically inclined, but they both commented on the flare with one suggesting I could take it to a photo shop to remove it.

    What are your thoughts? Is this flare a good thing or a bad thing?

    I also have some other pictures from this trip on my flickr page - would be really grateful for any C&C.

    Thanks
     

    Attached Files:

  2. MacDawg macrumors P6

    MacDawg

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2004
    Location:
    "Between the Hedges"
    #2
    I am no photo expert by any definition, but I wouldn't try to remove it
    I like the natural look of it

    Just my 2¢
    I know there are debates around about photo journalism, etc. but I think this is just for your personal enjoyment anyway
     
  3. allmIne macrumors 6502a

    allmIne

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    #3
    As with MacDawg, I'm no expert (though tbh, I think that's actually a good thing, because 99% of the people you show your photos to won't be an expert either!)

    I think if it wasn't right on the elephant, it'd be better. That said, I wouldn't bother trying to remove it. It does look natural, and it's still a great photo - love the light!
     
  4. Bauldrick macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2010
    #4
    Hiya,

    I think the idea of perfecting photos go out the window when you take photos of nature and wildlife, leave the photo as you would see it in real life, thats the beauty of natural photography.
    I went on a holiday recently and got plenty of shots that either had slight lens flare or lens flare that was realy obviouse.
    Here is one of the only shots that has a lot of lens flare.

    [​IMG]
    Sunset and a little brush tree by Bauldrick, on Flickr
     
  5. OreoCookie macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2001
    Location:
    Sendai, Japan
    #5
    I don't like it. If I had the choice, I'd take the photo without lens flare. But it's a matter of taste.

    Regarding your question: I think what you should ask yourself: what does the effect add to the picture? Why do I want it in the picture? (Works with anything, not just lens flare).

    In this case, I'd rather say that the lens flare doesn't ruin an otherwise good picture. But I think the lens flare doesn't add to the picture, it sucks your eye in and focusses away from the scenery.

    Ditto for the second photo, I find the red dot really annoying, my eyes immediately track it. I can't focus properly on the rest of the picture.
     
  6. PhelpsiPhan macrumors 6502

    PhelpsiPhan

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2009
    Location:
    New Jersey
  7. bocomo macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2007
    Location:
    New York
    #7
    +1
     
  8. citizenzen macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    #8
    +1 +1

    Both photos would look better without it.
     
  9. pintsizemacman macrumors regular

    pintsizemacman

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2010
    Location:
    ohio
  10. alt75 thread starter macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2007
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    #10
    OreoCookie- thanks. You make a good point. Pity... I used to like that photo!! :)

    Bauldrick- I do like yours.

    Thanks all for your thoughts, much appreciated as always.
     
  11. Bonch macrumors 6502

    Bonch

    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Location:
    Lithuania
    #11
    Flare just means you can't afford a decent lens, or don't care enough about the photo to fix it in post. Neither is a bad thing if true.
     

Share This Page