Google Announces 'Google Play Music All Access' Subscription Service

Discussion in ' News Discussion' started by MacRumors, May 15, 2013.

  1. MacRumors macrumors bot


    Apr 12, 2001

    Google today officially announced its new music subscription service, Google Play Music All Access, at the Google I/O conference in San Francisco. As reported yesterday afternoon, the service is designed to compete with Spotify, providing songs on demand that can be streamed to a computer or mobile device.

    The service, which is built on Google's existing Google Play Music Store, will cost $9.99 per month with a 30-day free trial available. Google is, however, offering a discount for early adopters. Those who begin the free trial by June 30 will pay just $7.99 per month. The Verge has a rundown on a few of the available features for music discovery and recommendations.
    Google's tagline for Google Play Music All Access is "Radio without Rules," a small jab at Apple's upcoming Pandora-style music service, iRadio. As of last week, Apple was still in negotiations with music labels but is reportedly aiming for a summer launch of its own music subscription service.

    Article Link: Google Announces 'Google Play Music All Access' Subscription Service
  2. tigert07 macrumors regular

    Jun 17, 2010
    I'm not sure if this is really a direct threat to spotify..
  3. malofx macrumors member


    Mar 22, 2012
    Los Angeles
    Not interested on paying 10 bucks a month... oh well.!
  4. ilp macrumors member

    Sep 13, 2007
  5. leon44 macrumors 6502


    Jun 17, 2010
    Newcastle upon Tyne, England
    Looks like a good alternative to Spotify,
    but only iRadio will have The Beatles ;)
  6. 4TheLoveOfTech, May 15, 2013
    Last edited: May 15, 2013

    4TheLoveOfTech macrumors 6502

    Feb 27, 2013
    According to Engadget it also has a free ad based service as well as paid.

    I am watching the i/o right now and didn't see anything about Free with Ads.

    "As anticipated, All Access will come in both free (ad-supported) and paid flavors. A subscription costs $9.99 a month in the US, and all users will get a 30-day free trial. The service is launching today, and if you sign up before June 30th, you'll get $2 off the monthly fee.'

    Engadget updated the paragraph and took out the Free with Ads comments.
  7. pirg macrumors 6502a


    Apr 18, 2013
    See no point in paying for music when things like Pandora are free.
  8. winston1236 macrumors 68000

    Dec 13, 2010
  9. Goldex macrumors member

    May 15, 2009
    why is that guy not wearing a pair of Google Glasses?!
  10. samac92 macrumors 6502a

    Feb 18, 2008
    Google Play Music All Access. Catchy name.

    I'm looking forward to trying this out. Though I do like living in the dark ages and buying music on CDs.
  11. bushido Suspended


    Mar 26, 2008
    but Pandora sucks. you cant simply play what you want i always end up just skipping till i reach the limit cuz it never plays what i want.

    this has the best of both "worlds" like Spotify which i will stick with cuz it does not get added to my data volume on my iPhone.

    gonna laugh if apple announces "iRadio" when everyone else offers both in one deal
  12. Ajones330 macrumors 6502a


    Jul 9, 2008
    SEC Country
    Apple has to get the negotiations done like yesterday. Google is putting the pressure on and rightfully so. Didn't really hear anything that made this music service any better than current ones but it definitely is getting a little hotter in kitchen for Apple...
  13. rjohnstone macrumors 68040


    Dec 28, 2007
    PHX, AZ.
    Looks like it has offline ability too... Spotify should be nervous.
  14. Mackilroy macrumors 68040


    Jun 29, 2006
    Google's product names continually become more and more verbose. Looks nice, but I don't listen to enough music to justify paying for a subscription.
  15. Peace macrumors P6


    Apr 1, 2005
    Space--The ONLY Frontier
    There's a couple of real radio stations that will have a problem with the term "Radio without the Rules".
  16. ValSalva macrumors 68040


    Jun 26, 2009
    Burpelson AFB
    So the big news at Google Uh/Oh is a Spotify copy? There is nothing compelling here to make anyone switch from Spotify.
  17. samcraig macrumors P6

    Jun 22, 2009
    I don't pay for spotify.

    When you create a radio station - can you swipe/remove songs in the play list?

    Nice function of Google's offering


    Why does there have to be something to switch people? Is everyone ON spotify?

    Second - the reason why some might switch is because they like Google's ecosystem and want a one stop shop. This provides that.

    Also - I don't think you can access your entire music library anywhere via spotify. Right? With Google's service - you can - in addition to millions of tracks
  18. malnar macrumors 6502a


    Aug 20, 2008
    A lot of people don't like listening to single songs by different artists and instead want to hear albums. Pandora is completely useless to someone like me, free or not. I'll gladly pay $10 a month for access to many hundreds of thousands of full albums. This is why Apple's offering, if it's modelled after Pandora, is going to be a non-starter for me. No albums, no deal.
  19. AppleMad98004 macrumors regular

    Aug 23, 2011
    Cylde Hill, WA

    This is desktop and on mobile Android only.

    I wonder if that is a licensing issue.

    Apple's service might be iOS only in that case.
  20. neuropsychguy macrumors 6502a


    Sep 29, 2008
    Maybe your tastes are too picky?

    Pandora just takes some guiding - thumb down anything you don't want on a station, even if you like the song. I have about 10 different stations on Pandora that play almost only music I want because I've taken some time to optimize them.

    I use both Pandora and Spotify a lot - Pandora is great if I want minimal intervention, Spotify is great when I'm looking for specific songs or artists or albums.
  21. Four oF NINE macrumors 68000

    Four oF NINE

    Sep 28, 2011
    Hell's Kitchen
    This is a boring development. I prefer iTunes model where I have my music on demand. My iPhone has an iPod.
  22. nwcs macrumors 65816


    Sep 21, 2009
    How many streaming audio services do we need? Surely we'll see some consolidation in the next few years. This doesn't serve my personal needs but why can't Google or Apple come up with a Netflix style streaming and do it better (with a larger catalog) at similar or better prices?
  23. Tankmaze macrumors 68000


    Mar 7, 2012
    US only ? if it's a worldwide launch, google could crush itunes.
  24. bushido Suspended


    Mar 26, 2008
    lol "on demand"? u rather pay 10 bucks for ONE album u may not even like after a month than pay 10 bucks for unlimited albums anywhere you go?

    if only apple would release a "spotify" for tv shows ... which will never happen with those greedy networks but one can dream
  25. Alumeenium macrumors regular

    May 15, 2013
    what a joke, $120 a year? no thanks
    I still dont see why people "buy" digital music, much less "rent" it...
    they will just have a new high bandwidth 24bit format soon
    and the networks will slow down once again
    data plans will explode and everyone gets price gouged, awesome:confused:

    PS. I only buy vinyl records... :cool:
    superior sound, art, and the ability to resell (usually at a profit)

Share This Page