Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The Apple Watch is the defacto smart watch at this point—Period 🤷‍♂️. Unless they come out with Watch-based teleportation nothing watchwise Google, or even Samsung for that matter, produces is going to make a huge impact w/ consumers or to the bottomline of Apple Watch sales
Except for the fact that apple watches only work on Apple phones at least with android if you change phone brands you can still use the watch. Theres a bigger range of androidnwear\garmin type fitness watches out there that work properly on android phones, so there's never going to be a massive seller compared to people with iPhones who have to buy an apple watch to get full functionality.
 
Google beats Apple by announcing satellite connectivity with the Pixel Watch 4. The watch won't go on sale until October 9, 2025. By then, the Apple Watch Ultra 3 will have been on sale for almost three weeks.
 
Standby for a lawsuit by Ressence Watches.

First thing I thought of...
1755721144474.png
 
If you showed both designs to someone 10 years ago and asked him… tell me which of them you’d say has been designed by Apple? Almost 100 percent would say the round one.

Absolutely…. Everyone here would be making fun of the square one if it weren’t the Apple one.

The objectivity around here is at an all-time low.

I don’t know why some folks can’t just give Google, or any other company, a win when they earn one.
 
Not at all interested in a google product, but GREAT that they beat Apple in repairability - Apple needs to step up in that field a lot. (just using recycled stuff for building still totally disposable and almost unrepairable products aren't enough)
 
Absolutely…. Everyone here would be making fun of the square one if it weren’t the Apple one.

The objectivity around here is at an all-time low.

I don’t know why some folks can’t just give Google, or any other company, a win when they earn one.
The guy who bemoans a perceived lack of objectivity...is the one who uses "Absolutely" with a purely esthetic opinion.
 
I love the round form factor. I would love my AW to be round. The Google watch is like the VW Bug, the AppleWatch like the Cybertruck.
 
This headline suggests a race that Google won. The correct title is Google First to put Satellite Connectivity in a watch. Is this useful? Is apple working on this or do they care? I dont know but saying beats is a weird construction.

Also this all looks cool. Google has gotten good at making cheap reasonable niche stuff. Not for me but they do a good job.
That's always the schtick of the so-called competition. Make something that emulates Apple, rush a few gimmick features to market and sell that as a value proposition. Personally, if I'm stuck in an emergency situation and need to call for help, I'd rather have the larger battery, processor, keyboard and transmission capacity to reach satellites.
 
No more or less than the standard Apple Chiclet Watches. Only the Ultra looks ok IMHO. Garmin Fenix looks better than both.

No, it looks like some off-brand trinket you would buy for a child in the toy aisle at TJ Maxx. Garmins all look like something a dad would wear on his first date after the divorce.
 
I prefer my circle Garmin to my previous Apple Watches... I don't need, or want, as much info on the screen, but even if I did, it still fits fine. The only thing I had on my AW was the time, date and weather.

As for this this Pixel watch, it looks nice but I would destroy the screen in a matter of days. I scratched the hell out of screen on my AW6 from a single boulders session...it continued to get worse after that.
I switched to an instinct 2X solar and haven’t looked back. Not trying to gang up on Apple here but smart watches are doing way too much for me. I just like the time, weather, GPS, workouts… I don’t need to compose emails, make calls, and text from my watch. I see its use case here and there and it’s natural progression to offer that and have that but it’s not for me. I’m not the target demographic for these things.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bluecoast
I love the circular design, especially with being reasonably thin.

Circular watches are not only inefficient for displaying information, but they make scrolling very painful. Either they have to constantly reformat the data, or they have to give up much of the screen to have square/rectangular area in which to display that data.

It eschews a huge piece of the dorky "computer on wrist" vibe of square-ish watches.

Sorry, it is a computer on your wrist, and your Garmin looks just as dorky.
 
  • Like
Reactions: germanbeer007
Folks think this is good looking:

View attachment 2539373

But this is ugly?


View attachment 2539372



I'm really struggling to see how one is arriving at that, short of just "I love Apple and hate Google".
Sorry, I do not like the watch face on the pixel nor do I like the color of the band. I do like the font/face on the Apple Watch, and I prefer a black band (I have a black band on my Apple Watch and had a black band on my Basis watch before my Apple Watch.

I understand that everything you hate the Apple Watch and cannot imagine anyone liking it, but given how well it sells, maybe your view is not that of the mainstream.
 
Not everyone wants a smartwatch to be a phone on their wrist.

My issue is not that I want a phone on my wrist, but that almost all the metrics I display (fitness, maps, etc.) provide way more information and allow it to flow better in a square/rectangular area.

I'd prefer the aesthetics of the round screen, and if I have a notification I have a phone that can handle anything more complex than a simple yes/no/ignore.

I like not needing to be tethered to my phone at all times, especially on the track or running on the beach.
 
I was recently stuck for 10 hours in the middle of nowhere Colorado on the California Zephyr. No WiFi, no cellular service (less than 1 bar or SoS and 200 passengers pinging the tower). Had to try satellite to send text messages about our delay, and staying in contact with a satellite was laborious, tedious, and frustrating.

Are you arguing that you would rather not have had the satellite connection? It is not as nice as a high speed 5G connection, but way better than no connection.
 
Absolutely…. Everyone here would be making fun of the square one if it weren’t the Apple one.

Simply not true. My last Seiko analog watch (with an LCD second Timezone display) was square. My Basis Band (the fitness watch I had before Apple released the Apple Watch), was square. Better and more useful data display.

The objectivity around here is at an all-time low.

I get it. Apple Bad. Garmin (and anything not Apple) Good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: germanbeer007
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.