The higher definition UK images is a new thing, I think - when I was playing with Google Earth a couple of weeks ago on a PC I built for a friend, all of Wolverhampton was a blur. Now I can even see the table in my gardenLord Blackadder said:The photo containing my house is at least 2 years old, because I can see my previous car in the driveway.
I also noticed that they blurred out the image of the nuclear power plant 30 miles from my house...it took me awhile to figure out why there was a big blur in one spot and then I had a forehead-slapping moment of realization. Duh.![]()
Hit cached and you'll see what it's actually finding that phrase from:liketom said:where where where is it !!!
google say's it there but unable to find it on the download section
andysmith said:The higher definition UK images is a new thing, I think - when I was playing with Google Earth a couple of weeks ago on a PC I built for a friend, all of Wolverhampton was a blur. Now I can even see the table in my garden![]()
I think most of the UK pictures are from 2003, from the buildings that have been knocked down or built since.
i found where them unicorns are at, and they all had iPodscamomac said:it's available in the "secret" places... where unicorns play D&D.
mikeyredk said:I wonder if they are using core image?
mcmillan said:For those who have a copy, how's performance in your Mac? In my Mac Mini (see specs in my sig), there's some issues in the 512x512 detail area resolution (default one). When I browse earth, the mouse "skips" a lot, it's not very smooth. When I go and check my Activity Monitor, the app only takes around 30% of CPU, 130Mb of RAM, and 373 Mb of Virtual memory. And there's still a lot of free RAM, CPU, and virtual memory. To me it seems like some kind of compatibility problem or something. So to use the app smoothly I have to lower the texture to 256x256. My Mac is less than year old, I know is a Mac Mini, but still, I have seen users talking about great performance in under 1Ghz Macs. Any suggestions to improve performance a little bit so I can use it with 512x512?
rickvanr said:Aside that it's an application, how is this any different then google maps satellite view?
Lacero said:This is a seriously cool feature. I think in about 2 years time, we'll see realistic renderings for all major metropolitan areas. This is where it's heading anyway.
![]()
Are you sure?pknz said:Yes I have the beta, it looks very good as it does on a Windows PC.
Flynnstone said:Very VERY cool![]()
I am going to upgrade to the Plus version. Anyone else?
Lacero said:Good lord. The Terrain feature is amazing!
Now, if we could only cache the entire planet on our hard drives.![]()
killuminati said:What are the benefits of the plus version?
I was getting the mouse skipping action as well on a G4 800 iMac, was a little annoying. Haven't tried it on my 1GHz iMac or PB yet though. Hopefully they're better with it. Could be a graphics card issue?mcmillan said:For those who have a copy, how's performance in your Mac? In my Mac Mini (see specs in my sig), there's some issues in the 512x512 detail area resolution (default one). When I browse earth, the mouse "skips" a lot, it's not very smooth. When I go and check my Activity Monitor, the app only takes around 30% of CPU, 130Mb of RAM, and 373 Mb of Virtual memory. And there's still a lot of free RAM, CPU, and virtual memory. To me it seems like some kind of compatibility problem or something. So to use the app smoothly I have to lower the texture to 256x256. My Mac is less than year old, I know is a Mac Mini, but still, I have seen users talking about great performance in under 1Ghz Macs. Any suggestions to improve performance a little bit so I can use it with 512x512?
JeDiBoYTJ said:WOW! the mods are really stubborn!
Although it is still not officially released... it is posted on MacUpdate ... now, if it was illegal and considered piracy, i highly doubt that site would post it, although im not posting a direct link to it, just do the search and you should find it.... maybe this post wont get deleted
[edit]
oh and... *cough* ... hey, dont get mad at me, this is on YOUR website!
mcmillan said:For those who have a copy, how's performance in your Mac? In my Mac Mini (see specs in my sig),