Sometimes reality, deception, disinformation, fake news, and truth blend all together to create this thing we call — Human Communication — The pinnacle of cognitive manipulation.
Pretty divisive there!
Trump voters routinely shooting non-white citizens and lawful visa holders is also pretty divisive there.
Google home has it right.
Im not even a Trump supporter, but do you have sources? Or do you just enjoy being edgy and perpetuating fake news yourself?
You living in a cave, or the shootings haven't made it to Breitbart yet?
Obama is working to undermine the Trump administration.
Oh I get it now. You're so duped by a particular political party that you're blinded by hate for "the other side."
If the Google Home product is repeating the things Trump says, then there's a pretty good chance that it is indeed spreading fake news and any criticism is thus justified.
[doublepost=1488835847][/doublepost]
Nice conspiracy theory there guy. One problem with it though: Trump doesn't need any help undermining his presidency. Trump does that all on his own. And he's very very good at it. Big league!
Every major media network is experiencing ratings drops because they push one agenda or another
http://www.politicususa.com/2017/03/05/rachel-maddow-history-finishing-top-10-viewed-shows-tv.htmlRachel Maddow’s MSNBC show is growing so much so fast that she is drawing more viewers than broadcast television networks. Maddow recently finished in top ten among all networks and programs in her time slot.
MSNBC announced Maddow’s unprecedented ratings growth via a press release:
MSNBC’s “The Rachel Maddow Show” (M-F 9-10pm) finished in the top 10 among all networks in the time period on Thursday, March 2, according to Nielsen.
The primetime show delivered 2.5 million total viewers on Thursday and ranked #6 ahead of three broadcast networks: Fox Broadcasting, Univision and ABC. “The Rachel Maddow Show” also finished in the top 10 multiple times – including 14 out of the previous 19 days.
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/01/31/fox-news-channel-marks-ratings-milestone.htmlIn January, FOX News Channel garnered an average of 2.8 million viewers, up 35 percent from the previous year. Also in January, the network topped basic cable as the highest-rated network in total day viewers, beating ESPN
No. Modern politics are. Every political faction has adopted "the end justifies the means" philosophy, whether you are liberal, conservative, libertarian or some mix of the above. People will happily quote and cite a black vs white opinion article that agrees with their political identity and ignoring even the possibility of a shade of gray.
[doublepost=1488812746][/doublepost]
Do you care when you are affected because a large number of ignorant people decide who gets elected or if a law is enacted, repealed or retained? What sites do you consider "fake news"? If you post them here, right now, you would derail this conversation into an argument about what sites are or are not a fake news site.
How many times have you been asked a question, in general, and told the person asking the question to "Google it"? Even if you personally never have you have to admit it's a very common response. This is verbal Googling. If someone knows little or nothing about the subject how deep do you think they will go researching it? They wanted an answer not a research project.
No. Modern politics are. Every political faction has adopted "the end justifies the means" philosophy, whether you are liberal, conservative, libertarian or some mix of the above. People will happily quote and cite a black vs white opinion article that agrees with their political identity and ignoring even the possibility of a shade of gray.
[doublepost=1488812746][/doublepost]
Do you care when you are affected because a large number of ignorant people decide who gets elected or if a law is enacted, repealed or retained? What sites do you consider "fake news"? If you post them here, right now, you would derail this conversation into an argument about what sites are or are not a fake news site.
How many times have you been asked a question, in general, and told the person asking the question to "Google it"? Even if you personally never have you have to admit it's a very common response. This is verbal Googling. If someone knows little or nothing about the subject how deep do you think they will go researching it? They wanted an answer not a research project.
I stand by what I said and the ratings have been dropping year over year.Another one of those alternative facts.
2016 Ratings: CNN Has Most-Watched Year Ever
http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/2016-ratings-cnn-has-most-watched-year-ever/315014
March 2017 Rachel Maddow Makes History By Finishing In The Top 10 Most Viewed
http://www.politicususa.com/2017/03/05/rachel-maddow-history-finishing-top-10-viewed-shows-tv.html
FOX News Channel marks ratings milestone
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/01/31/fox-news-channel-marks-ratings-milestone.html
You were saying?
I stand by what I said and the ratings have been dropping year over year.
Last year was an election year and we have never had an election like it in my lifetime. Believe me, when there is a train wreck (fabricated or not), people stop and watch.
When ratings return to nothing this year, don't be shocked they gave theirselves too much credit.
What I said was "alternative facts" but what you "cited" only proves that last year was a good year. Sounds like you are trying to mislead people as much as the media.
You proved that ratings were abnormally high during an election like we have never had. You gave links to people touting their own horn. The train wreck is over and people will go back to their normal life. Trump is just another neocon in conservative clothing. Nothing to see, now.Why would they return to nothing when the train wreck they tuned in for last year is still in the process of derailing?
The one misleading people here is you. You can stand by what you said all you want, but you have nothing to support it and what you said was not true. I gave actual stats with links, you gave me crystal ball predictions.![]()
It goes deeper than journalism but you are right they should be accountable. Freedom of press doesn't exist so the media can speculate and take sides. Freedom of press exists so journalists can report facts and not be in fear of the government arresting them.Make journalists accountable for the information published. Right now anything goes without consequences. Freedom of expression is a right but also a great power and as such it comes with great responsibility.
Trump is just another neocon in conservative clothing. Nothing to see, now.
It goes deeper than journalism but you are right they should be accountable. Freedom of press doesn't exist so the media can speculate and take sides. Freedom of press exists so journalists can report facts and not be in fear of the government arresting them.
So let me get this straight, I learned this week that my google home is feeding me bullsh!t and my Samsung TV is spying on me?
The train wreck is over and people will go back to their normal life.
You are cherry picking statistics to fit a certain narrative and it's obvious.