Google Launches 'Backup and Sync' Mac App for Google Photos and Google Drive

Discussion in 'Mac Blog Discussion' started by MacRumors, Jul 12, 2017.

  1. MacRumors macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    Google today announced the launch of Backup and Sync, a new app for Macs and PCs that's designed to back up files and photos safely in Google Drive and Google Photos. The new app is meant to replace the existing Google Photos desktop uploader and Drive for Mac/PC.

    To use Backup and Sync, Google Drive/Photos users just need to download the app and then choose the folders they want to back up. From there, the selected folders will be continually backed up to Google's services, providing an alternative to Time Machine and making it easier to automatically store important files in the cloud.

    [​IMG]

    In addition to specific folders on a Mac or PC, Backup and Sync can also automatically import files from SD cards and USB devices when a camera, SD card, or other device is connected to a computer.

    There are also specific options users can set to dictate how file deletions are handled, and users can choose to upload photos at a lower quality if space is a concern.

    Backup and Sync is available starting today through Google Drive and Google Photos.

    Article Link: Google Launches 'Backup and Sync' Mac App for Google Photos and Google Drive
     
  2. bigjnyc macrumors 603

    bigjnyc

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2008
  3. jonnysods macrumors 603

    jonnysods

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2006
    Location:
    There & Back Again
  4. expiredyogurt macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2016
    Location:
    not america
    #4
    Been waiting for this to launch now. It was supposed to launch back in june but ofcourse they delayed it and finally it's here.

    I'm gonna test it out with my son's pc and see how it goes. It's mainly ms paint drawings that he has and whatnot so I'm not too scared about the privacy issues that people are whining about.

    It would definitely be a good alternative to time machine as well
     
  5. zorinlynx macrumors 601

    zorinlynx

    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    Location:
    Florida, USA
    #5
    I'm surprised Google has not come out with an app equivalent to Photos.app for MacOS and Windows.

    Android users don't have a nice app like we do that stays synced automatically and keeps a constant local copy of your library. They can only view their photos on the website.

    Google would do well releasing a Photos.app equivalent. I wonder why they won't.
     
  6. Pman17 macrumors regular

    Pman17

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2011
    Location:
    Galveston, TX
    #6
    Sweet! I can finally get my OneDrive on my "Unlimited" Drive.
     
  7. motm95 macrumors member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2010
    #7
    I swear, Google is the king of replacing and deprecating its services for something new that basically does the same thing. Kind of annoying.
     
  8. raazman macrumors member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2010
    #8
    This is not the same thing.
     
  9. canadianreader macrumors 6502

    canadianreader

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2014
  10. benz240 macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2008
    #10
    I miss Picasa
     
  11. sevoneone macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 16, 2010
    #11
    Do you mean like the Google Photos app available for Android and iOS? It is an awesome app on both iOS and Android. I prefer it to the built in Photos app in iOS. I am not sure where you got the impression that Android users were stuck using a web app? It is particularly good if you have devices on both platforms and want to access your photos across all of them. Unlimited storage if you don't mind it scaling photos over 16 megapixels (iPhone is 12) isn't bad either. Though it would be nice if they would release a storage option between the 100GB and 1TB plans.

    This isn't replacing or depreciating anything, rather enhancing and combining the experience of two existing products. Despite their knack for creating promising products and then slowly ruining them, Google has done a pretty good job with their Photos platform. Just wish they would have created an updated version of Picasa or new standalone desktop app to integrate with it.
     
  12. szw-mapple fan macrumors 65816

    szw-mapple fan

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2012
    #12
    Time Machine is more than just backup though. It also has versioning, which is very handy when I want to go back to an older version of something.
     
  13. macLifestyle macrumors newbie

    macLifestyle

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2012
    Location:
    Kansas City
    #13
    This is not "...an alternative to Time Machine." Time Machine is a local backup. Google Drive is a remote backup. They are fundamentally different. Both local backups and remote backups are part of a complete backup plan. It could correctly be said Google Drive is an alternative to iCloud backup.
     
  14. xpxp2002 macrumors member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2016
    #14
    Right. I'm certain it doesn't back up system preferences or installed apps, either.
     
  15. Internet Enzyme macrumors regular

    Internet Enzyme

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2016
    #15
    They lie. They say it works with MacOS Versions 10.9+. It does not work with APFS.
     
  16. subjonas macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2014
    #16
    So how does pricing work? Photos are free with certain limitations, and for other file types you use up your regular google storage subscription tier?

    Doesn't google scan all my photos and files? I'm not comfortable with that. Does iCloud have a selective folder sync feature?
     
  17. Internet Enzyme macrumors regular

    Internet Enzyme

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2016
    #17
    With iCloud, files you drag into the iCloud Drive sidebar in Finder will be synced
     
  18. subjonas macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2014
    #18
    Bummer
     
  19. bartvk macrumors 6502

    bartvk

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2016
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    #19
    So it is just sync, instead of backup and sync? That would seem very misleading.
     
  20. itsmilo macrumors 65816

    itsmilo

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2016
    Location:
    Europe
    #20
    I hope this works better than their uploader. I have had a certain amount of images (about 25) sitting there for whatever reason failing to upload
     
  21. dannys1 macrumors 68020

    dannys1

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2007
    Location:
    UK
    #21
    Great, now I can have my entire hard drives content backed up to Googles servers via my Google Fibre connection, via my Google wifi using Google DNS and get notified about it in my Googlemail.

    OK Google, how much do you know about me now?
     
  22. Ener Ji macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2010
    #22
    Picasa was a pretty great app back in the day, but Google wanted to focus on web applications. See here for more details:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picasa
     
  23. alexclst macrumors newbie

    alexclst

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Location:
    Saint Paul, MN
    #23
    Now just to wait for the Google Drive iOS app to get an update that supports these new Computer folders so I can get to this stuff on my iPhone and iPad.

    Also, a little disappointed that this won't sync two of the same folders between computers. It'd have been nice to be able to sync my Desktop folders through this... Would've done that with iCloud except that I don't want my Documents folders synced (mostly do that anyway through symlinks to folders in Box, dropbox, etc.).
     
  24. expiredyogurt macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2016
    Location:
    not america
    #24
    Did the initial back up and sync but I can't find the folder on my gdrive like that said it would be.

    I had to go to the recent file uploads, open the info and select the folder location of it. There is no way to location the folder when you're in gdrive.

    unless I miss something, this is a huge oversight?
     
  25. JGIGS macrumors 6502a

    JGIGS

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2008
    #25
    iCloud is expensive and doesn't give nearly the same amount of free storage. Also isn't friendly with non Apple products. Big difference.
     

Share This Page