Google Street View publishes naked picture of her son, three, online

[ChrisGonzales90]

another reason why google is evil

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...Google-shows-3-year-old-son-naked-garden.html

 

[bov]

hahahaha well if let your son run around naked like that, that's just a chance you have to take!

Big Brother Google Street View

 

[ChrisGonzales90]

Still, Google's CEO, while he may apear to be enjoying it, needs to cut it out.

 

[Surely]

What's with the kid thing there chief?

Ever heard of editing the title? Don't post the same thread twice.

 

[Mexbearpig]

Still, Google's CEO, while he may apear to be enjoying it, needs to cut it out.

Where is he appearing to be enjoying it?

 

[Shyfty]

Oooh... scaremongering!

Yeah, get over it, Gonzales.

 

[appleguy123]

So what does the news paper do? Report it giving a bigger potential for perverts to see it.

 

[Shyfty]

So what does the news paper do? Report it giving a bigger potential for perverts to see it.

Exactly. The media has behaved more irresponsibly than Google as far as this is concerned.

 

[iBlue]

Big deal. A toddler's butt.

I never would have seen it had mummy dearest not made such a big fuss. If she had any brains at all she should realize this would only call more attention to it. Or perhaps she did realize that and her motives are not as focused on her child's safety as she claims. Mountains out of molehills, as ever.

 

[ethical]

Any number of people could have walked past that house and seen the little kid running around, it's the mother's fault. It's not hard to get an image removed from street view, and involving the press (the Daily Mail *cringe*) just made the whole thing worse.

 

[Ttownbeast]

oh crap here he comes......

 

[.Andy]

And the OP is a daily mail reader.

 

[rdowns]

another reason why google is evil

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...Google-shows-3-year-old-son-naked-garden.html

No more evil than Apple.

 

[heehee]

Big deal. A toddler's butt.

What she said.

 

[R94N]

Well, he was in the front garden. Everybody would've been able to see him anyway.

 

[benflick]

Here's a shocking idea. Don't let your three year old run around completely naked.
(To the mom): Ever heard of a swimsuit, dumbass?

 

[Macky-Mac]

she says;

...my concern is that paedophiles could see it....

and yet she lets her son run around naked in the front yard where paedophiles could see him

 

[benflick]

she says;



and yet she lets her son run around naked in the front yard where paedophiles could see him

I know! What's worse, a pedophile looking at the kid on Google Maps, or a pedophile being there in real life? Both are bad, but still.

 

[MattSepeta]

oh crap here he comes......

hide your kids!

 

[ethical]

she says;

and yet she lets her son run around naked in the front yard where paedophiles could see him

I know! Last I checked paedophiles didn't scour google street view on the off chance of finding a naked kid... she's made the whole situation far worse.

 

[Rodimus Prime]

the media is blowing this out of proportion. Google tends to remove and blur out objects like that very quickly once they have been notified by some one. They make it pretty easy to submit objectionable image from street view. A human will look at it and quickly correct it.
It is like when their software misses a face or car licenses plate. As soon as they are told about it. It gets blurred out. If you want you house removed just requested it and they honor it. They do not require any back ground info. They make it really easy.

I am going to guess that the image is completely removed from street view now and if not completely blurred out.

 

[yg17]

You like popsicles?