Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Google to Pay $22.5 Million Settlement in Safari Privacy Circumvention Case
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
KnightWRX posted the below quote in response to my stating that I felt that Google has been behaving like the new "Big Brother", more so than even Microsoft had been referred to in years past. He has twice tried to correct my opinion, saying that such a reference is not a metaphor, as I have claimed it to be, but is instead hyperbole.
Actually is is not a hyperbole as used. (however, had it been, the correct grammar in your response would have been to say "a" hyperbole, not "an" hyperbole.
A hyperbole would be a deliberate exaggeration, such as; "It weighs a ton" or "he embraced her a thousand times". It is not a comparison of one thing to another, which is a metaphor. Such as "the road is a ribbon", "all the world's a stage", or "Google is the new "big brother". It describes a subject by asserting that there is a point of comparison to some other subject or object. There need only be a point of comparison, not everything about one needs to be identical to the other. So Google need not be a state government or possess the same power of information control as Orwell's "Big Brother" for it to be compared, metaphorically, to "Big Brother".
Perhaps you seem to forget Apple's own brilliant use of the same metaphor in it's ground-breaking "1984" commercial, generally considered directed at IBM. So I would say that "Big Brother" metaphor comparisons to subjects other than governments identical to that described in "1884" is fairly well demonstrated. Again, there need only be a point of comparison for it to be a metaphor. My point of comparison is Google's extensive collection of data, frequently surreptitiously, on private citizens engaged in private activities.
Finally, your efforts to discredit my post and at times others OP's I have noticed, through derogatory remarks, such as; "Again, you can turn off the telescreen.", or "You know, people should actually read George Orwell's 1984 before trying to use it as a reference for anything" simply show weakness in your argument, if not in your character. You know nothing about me, including viewing habits of the "telescreen", what I have read (yes I have read "1984" or my professional endeavors. So attacks on those personal aspects of me are truly rooted in ignorance.
Actually is is not a hyperbole as used. (however, had it been, the correct grammar in your response would have been to say "a" hyperbole, not "an" hyperbole.
A hyperbole would be a deliberate exaggeration, such as; "It weighs a ton" or "he embraced her a thousand times". It is not a comparison of one thing to another, which is a metaphor. Such as "the road is a ribbon", "all the world's a stage", or "Google is the new "big brother". It describes a subject by asserting that there is a point of comparison to some other subject or object. There need only be a point of comparison, not everything about one needs to be identical to the other. So Google need not be a state government or possess the same power of information control as Orwell's "Big Brother" for it to be compared, metaphorically, to "Big Brother".
Perhaps you seem to forget Apple's own brilliant use of the same metaphor in it's ground-breaking "1984" commercial, generally considered directed at IBM. So I would say that "Big Brother" metaphor comparisons to subjects other than governments identical to that described in "1884" is fairly well demonstrated. Again, there need only be a point of comparison for it to be a metaphor. My point of comparison is Google's extensive collection of data, frequently surreptitiously, on private citizens engaged in private activities.
Finally, your efforts to discredit my post and at times others OP's I have noticed, through derogatory remarks, such as; "Again, you can turn off the telescreen.", or "You know, people should actually read George Orwell's 1984 before trying to use it as a reference for anything" simply show weakness in your argument, if not in your character. You know nothing about me, including viewing habits of the "telescreen", what I have read (yes I have read "1984" or my professional endeavors. So attacks on those personal aspects of me are truly rooted in ignorance.
Oh big deal, they'll get a very inaccurate location of my house.
----------
Exactly. It's all about getting the right ads to the right people.
Agreed. Given how much cash Google has and its insatiable desire to access our data, the fine is small enough to be deemed a cost of doing business. Google should have been forced, in addition to the $22 million fine, to pay every user of Safari (they know who we are) an agreed sum ($1000.00) for violating our privacy. You best believe that they wouldn't do that again.