Uum, literally right from their update change log "The update brings with it the ability to search for accounts and transfer multiple accounts to another device,"
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Google Updates Authenticator App Ahead of iOS 15's Upcoming Built-in Code Generator
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Uum, literally right from their update change log "The update brings with it the ability to search for accounts and transfer multiple accounts to another device,"
I’m still using hardware keys with Yubikey, have one in my MacBook, another on a set of keys. This will be really convenient for most, but I still prefer to keep third-parties out of login credentials.
Then, of course, buy a license as 1Password still supports that with no problem.
It's entertaining that up-thread someone was bashing Google Authenticator for not doing backups, but they think they want to use Apple's solution, that doesn't have backups either? I'd never use Google Authenticator, of course, but I'd never use Apple's solution, either.
Guessing the process will be the same as setting up other 2FA accounts. Point camera at Q code etc.
I think the point of this article was that Google was kind of complacent of their authenticator app. Six updates in seven years, with three in six months in an attempt to remain competitive. I'm ready to see Apple enhance the 2FA experience like they have with Maps.
Yep. I save the QR code (screenshot) and back them up on an thumb drive and external HDD.
I was able to transfer Google Authenticator codes using an encrypted iTunes backup. I don't remember whether it was between devices or back onto the same device. But that capability was totally undocumented.
Edit: Confirming that this isn't hardware-based, other auth apps mentioned above have multi-device support.
People get new phones. Inability to transfer codes makes it easy to get locked out, meaning any site using this has to also have a reset mechanism that'll probably just be email. Ultimately less secure IMO.
For most things I don't care much whether it's 1P or 3P. But for 2FA, I won't even look at third-party solutions, for a variety of reasons. Security in general is hard, and 2FA is still young. Important things like my bank already have their own 2FA via their native app, which is good, but for most things I don't need 2FA enough to bother with a third-party app for it.
Especially after the terrible experience I had with Google Authenticator, which I only used cause I was implementing 2FA on a website. Perfect example of nerds thinking their users are nerds. There are probably better apps, but whatever.
Last edited:
I agree with several others in the thread. If this had been some other company software release, MR probably wouldn't' have given it front page status, and rightfully so. I doin't see why Google is worthy of such with just a software update.
Knowing Google, they probably aren't complacent. If something is working great for them, they put even more effort into it. If something isn't popular enough, they stop caring.
What does you implementing 2FA on a web site have to do with Google Authenticator?
They intentionally made 1Password 7 license upgrades super expensive and actively promoting their subscription. Note that 1Password is now mostly feature-complete. There is no reason why anyone will upgrade anymore, subscription is just a money grab.
I started using Google's app around a year ago and it was so easy and smooth to change my phone from Android to iPhone.
I only had issues with Duo and Microsoft Authenticator.
How did you determine that? In the past year, 1Password has added several major new features, including Apple Watch unlock; automatic inline password fill, first in Safari and now in Chromium browsers; and just recently added made their Chromium browser plugins work directly with the application and share unlock status.
Those are all major upgrades and a huge increase in my productivity. It is worth way more than the $60/yr (for a full family) than 1Password charges. It is too bad there are too many people who hate that developers actually want to be paid for their work.
I wonder why Google doesn't let us use Authenticator on Mac. Why only iPhone & iPad?
Google has updated its 2FA Authenticator app for iOS with a new privacy feature that lets users require Face ID or Touch ID before displaying two-factor account authentication codes.
Previously, fingerprint or facial authentication was only required when exporting accounts. Now though, upon activating Google's Privacy Screen feature in v3.2.0 of the app, Face ID or Touch ID is needed in order to show newly generated codes.
The authentication requirement can be set to show immediately, after 10 seconds, 1 minute, or 10 minutes. In addition, Google has added a search bar to the top of the app interface to let users search for accounts.
Google Authenticator's previous update introduced a dark mode and the aforementioned account transfer feature. However, the latest improvements are likely to be seen by many Apple device users as verging on the redundant, following the news earlier this month that iOS 15 will include a built-in password authenticator.
When Apple releases iOS 15 in the fall, iPhone and iPad users will be able to natively generate 2FA verification codes for additional sign-in security, so there will be no need for a separate app.
Apple says that you'll be able to set up verification codes under Passwords in the Settings app. And once set up, the codes will autofill when you sign into a site, making the use of two-factor authentication a more streamlined experience than using a third-party method. This feature will be available on iOS 15, iPadOS 15, and macOS Monterey.
Article Link: Google Updates Authenticator App Ahead of iOS 15's Upcoming Built-in Code Generator
No, those are small touch ups. The architecture doesn’t change. 1Password is far beyond a minimum variable product already. Most users will not fork out more money to upgrade, therefore they need people on subscription.
The price may feel okay if you have a family, but if you are young and single, their price is exorbitant.
That still doesn't change the fact that it has the feature (which the person I was responding to claimed it doesn't).💁♂️
I'm the person you were responding to, and I never claimed that. There is no backup feature. If you drop your phone and it stops working, the transfer feature won't help you.