Not exactly. This is hand-held. They take many pictures with short exposure and "add" them together, discarding any blurry ones. No DSLR can do that.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Google's Upcoming 'Night Sight' Mode for Pixel Phones Captures Remarkable Low-Light Photos
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Not exactly. This is hand-held. They take many pictures with short exposure and "add" them together, discarding any blurry ones. No DSLR can do that.
If this is all done in SW, there's no reason Apple couldn't add this as a user selectable feature in a SW update. I would also like Apple to let the user have more options in the camera app in general, like super long exposure, better time lapse control, etc.
In many ways, photography is like music. It can take years to learn to do it right, it's a craft with a bit of science thrown in. Now, much of it's automated and what one can do with it in just a few clicks is really just awesome in its own right. I feel like an old timer "well, back in my day!" and while I see both the beauty and need for this intelligence, I'm also a little sad at the loss of human art and style.
10 years from now it won't matter where you point the camera - just say to your phone "Take a nice picture of the park".
lol, then simply turn it off. It's not on for all shots, it's simply a "mode" you can enable for the majority of users who are trying to simply capture a moment in low light, not artists trying to create a certain look. I don't think it's creating the image, but rather more compared to how if you have a higher end camera in near pitch black, if you have it on a tripod and set it to a long exposure it will look like daylight. It's not creating but allowing more light into the lens. This hasn't been possible on phones because one of the tiny sensors and lens but most importantly because to capture a long exposure you'd need a tripod which most people do not have when using a phone. So it appears to take multiple longer handled exposures which would normally would be very blurry and then uses AI to merge those photos. Apps like Cortex Camera have done this to an extent but the results are very minor compared to these mind blowing results. While I have no plans of ever switching to Android for many reasons, this is great news for Pixel users and for photographers in general as others try to backward engineer it.
Phtography is one of those interesting things, where if you're good at it, the hardware isn't really the most important thing. it might help with people who are weaker at photography at getting some usable shots, but like most "art", it's going to be a self skill.
where I think such nightmode is beneficial is not really in the "art" side of photography, but the day to day snapshots to capture a moment. Those who only care about that will be happy. Those who are photographers for "art" purposes will probably find interesting ways of using this tech, but it's likely less important. Just gives them another tool in their arsenal.
ISO doesn't not affect the data from the sensor. When I shoot,
Anyhow, if the program directly accesses the camera sensors and manipulates the data from that, the results would be better . I'm guessing it's what the Pixel does. If it has to manipulate data from a processes JPEG then a lot of data has already been lost. That's why some photographers swear by RAW (basically a data dump of what the sensor captured).
Edit: I reread what I wrote and found it illogical and confusing. I don't under expose on purpose, I expose for the brightest part of the picture. The result is an under exposed picture from which I can draw out details from the dark area. Blown out highlights cannot be recovered. Hopefully that makes more sense.
Last edited:
Yep. And it won't be available on my $1150 XS Max. I'll have to buy the new version, even though it could easily be done on the XS Max.
It's the Apple way.
So Google is faking these images, even when taken by somebody else? What are you talking about?
The iPhone flash could not possibly light up the entire frame, much less light it up this evenly. You'd have to have an external flash for this.
My Panasonic M43 camera does the same. Takes multiple photos (3-5 I think) and bundles them together into a far brighter image. It's great for when I'm exploring a city on holiday and don't want to carry a tripod with me. The results are "good enough" for what I want, and that's memories not prints. Likewise if viewed on a phone, I'm sure they would be more than good enough.
yes, RAW > JPG everyday
I would much rather do what you say, shoot lower ISO in raw, and then use post processing to increase the exposure.
However, ignoring ISO as a factor can be a detriment. There are certain lighting conditions and activities where ISO might be your only adjustible factor.
For example, Shooting poorly lit hockey inside an arena. The activity / motion is fast, therefore you loose ability to increase the exposure time. Also you're often a little further away, so using a longer lense might prevent you from using a lower fstop on your aperture without shrinking your depth of field too much. So you're stuck with ISO increases to help offset to help increase the amount of light the sensor is allowed to detect.
When I shoot, I believe in the "holy trinity" of those three above. But ISO is often the last of the three I like to adjust due to the known issues with increasing ISO. Ideally, I start at 100 and only increase should the photos not turn out.
It's not easy. What Google does is from doing long exposure and using AI to remove blur. So no need for a tripod.
Yes, and but I don't think we will see it until the 2019 iPhones as a new 'feature' . lol. Competition is good for the consumer and these smartphone cameras will only continue to get better and better.
On a side note, Pro Camera + has two low light modes that work quite well but I imagine Googles still has the upper hand.
Sounds like it takes multiple shots and merges rather than just 1 long exposure, but it clearly suffers from motion in the same way that a long exposure shot would.
https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/13335327/IMG_20181025_185437.jpg
https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/13335327/IMG_20181025_185437.jpg
Let’s see them blown up
Let’s see them blown up to at least 6x4 there is no way a camera can take photos in the dark and reproduce usable photos without either s tripod or a long exposure , all looks well if your maybe looking at the photo on a phone but any serious photographer and I mean just s phone user would find them very noisy ( grainy ) e en if you zoom in on the pictures taken on the I phone there pretty poor quality really
At a media event in New York City earlier this month, Google previewed a new low-light camera feature called "Night Sight" that uses machine learning to choose the right colors based on the content of the image. The result is much brighter photos in low-light conditions, without having to use flash.
Google showed a side-by-side comparison of two unedited photos shot in low light with an iPhone XS and its latest Pixel 3 smartphone with Night Sight, and the photo shot on the latter device is much brighter.
Google said Night Sight will be available next month for its Pixel smartphones, but an XDA Developers forum member managed to get the feature to work ahead of time, and The Verge's Vlad Savov tested out the pre-release software on a Pixel 3 XL. The results, pictured below, are simply remarkable.
Without Night Sight
With Night Sight
Without Night Sight
With Night Sight
Without Night Sight
With Night Sight
Google and Apple are both heavily invested in computational photography. On the latest iPhones, for example, Smart HDR results in photos with more highlight and shadow detail, while Depth Control significantly improves Portrait Mode. But, Night Sight takes low-light smartphone photography to a whole new level.
Article Link: Google's Upcoming 'Night Sight' Mode for Pixel Phones Captures Remarkable Low-Light Photos
At a media event in New York City earlier this month, Google previewed a new low-light camera feature called "Night Sight" that uses machine learning to choose the right colors based on the content of the image. The result is much brighter photos in low-light conditions, without having to use flash.
Google showed a side-by-side comparison of two unedited photos shot in low light with an iPhone XS and its latest Pixel 3 smartphone with Night Sight, and the photo shot on the latter device is much brighter.
Google said Night Sight will be available next month for its Pixel smartphones, but an XDA Developers forum member managed to get the feature to work ahead of time, and The Verge's Vlad Savov tested out the pre-release software on a Pixel 3 XL. The results, pictured below, are simply remarkable.
Without Night Sight
With Night Sight
Without Night Sight
With Night Sight
Without Night Sight
With Night Sight
Google and Apple are both heavily invested in computational photography. On the latest iPhones, for example, Smart HDR results in photos with more highlight and shadow detail, while Depth Control significantly improves Portrait Mode. But, Night Sight takes low-light smartphone photography to a whole new level.
Article Link: Google's Upcoming 'Night Sight' Mode for Pixel Phones Captures Remarkable Low-Light Photos
Kinda creepy that someone can take a picture of you in the dark and have it come out this clear without a flash to give them away... but it’s a cool tech.
99.44% of the time, I also follow this rule, because it's less work afterwards. The .66% of the time the lighting is gawd awfully bad (impossible to expose properly). If it's landscape or still life, I shoot multiple shots at with 1 stop difference and merge them into one photo post production. For action, I set manual and hope for the best.