Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I... I don't think I can get behind this.

If I'm shooting at night, it's for a reason. I'd much rather have a camera capable of rendering what I'm actually seeing versus one that can apply a filter to turn night into day. This is essentially the same kind of thing that Prism does, turning a photo into "art." It's no longer reality.

This is the most ridiculous thing I have ever read. If Apple introduced this you would think it was amazing. And rightly so.
 
So Apple could technically do the same right?

They could. But remember these are dark scenes that the system is using algorithms to guess what it looks like when it’s not dark. So not really low light photography. So perhaps while Apple could do this, maybe what they should do is actually find a way to get true low light photography into their systems with the proper light sensors etc.
[doublepost=1540573546][/doublepost]
This is the most ridiculous thing I have ever read. If Apple introduced this you would think it was amazing. And rightly so.

Uh no s/he wouldn’t and neither would I. For exactly the comment made, shooting at night should produce a night shot not a fake day shot
 
Since Google can do this on the Pixel 1 (and how anemic its CPU is in comparison to the A series) Apple should probably be able to do it all the way back to the 6s. Get to it Apple engineers, would love to have this rolled out next summer.
In a perfect world I'd love to see Apple do this.
 
As others have noted, this is just software, and there are already iOS apps that do this same sort of thing (Lightroom's camera in "long exposure" mode, Hydra in "low light" mode, NightCap, etc.) - the only change here is that Google put it into their base Camera app and to some extent automated it, rather than looking to third parties to implement it.

I DO wish Apple would improve their built-in Camera app to include more manual controls, better computational options, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dotnet
This is really impressive. Good work google engineers.

Is it? I mean we have lots of what are probably no flash photos taken with the iPhone and then possibly with flash photos from the Pixel but where are the photos from a low light DSLR or SLR for comparison. Just because the photos are brighter doesn’t mean that the system is accurate
 
This is the single most impressive and useful computational photography trick I have ever seen.

Sigh…

Maybe next year, Apple?
 
  • Like
Reactions: MEJHarrison
Is it? I mean we have lots of what are probably no flash photos taken with the iPhone and then possibly with flash photos from the Pixel but where are the photos from a low light DSLR or SLR for comparison. Just because the photos are brighter doesn’t mean that the system is accurate

When I use a point and shoot and it makes the pictures clearer and easier to see that’s a win in my book. I don’t care if it’s the best quality picture in the world. I care if it looks good and you can easily see what I wanted you to see when I took the picture. Way too often my iPhone struggles in low light to capture a good picture. Software like this would be a great addition to the iPhone for users like me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: uneeko1ne
As soon as these two companies crack low-light we can all stop buying £1000 phones each year and they can stop making them every year. And the world can go back to some small semblance of sanity.
 
I think this is an amazing new feature for Google. Where I see this being used and having the most value would be in a dimly lit restaurant where you are trying to take photos of family members and friends. Even with my iPhone Xs the pictures are very grainy and look pretty bad in a dimly lit room.
 
Apple: Hey Google, we could really use that Night Sight technology on our iPhones.

Google: Hey Apple, you know that $12 billion a year we give you to make us the default search engine on those iPhones?

Apple: Oh crap.

Convo wouldn’t go like that. They would pay peanuts to buy all those apps that have already figured out long exposure etc controls and then put that into their camera apps. Or set up a way to add plug ins to the app and invite the developers to do that then they don’t have to pay anything. And I actually love that idea. I buy plug ins for final cut etc all the time, so buying them to add features to the camera app, to iMovie etc wouldn’t really bug me as long as the prices aren’t too stupid. And I would much rather have everything in one place than have to switch between 5 different apps
 
This is nothing special. Can be done in post easily when the data is there. I don’t need the phone to do it automatically because then it can go wrong too. I‘ve been using apps like „Hydra“ for years. Piece of cake.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dotnet
I'd really love to see some full size hi-res files. I just can't imagine that there could be much image detail. to get that kind of light at a fast enough shutter speed, the ISO would have to be astronomically high, and then you'd have to crank up the noise reduction to smooth it out. The result would be something like the "beautify effect" that people are complaining about with the XS's front camera. If Google actually created some kind of noiseless low-light images like that--through new camera tech or through software-- that would pretty much be the greatest leap forward in digital photography this decade.
 
Apple getting embarrassed by Google with the camera now, SAD!!
It’s not the camera doing that, it’s the software. Let’s be real. It’s a gimmick that will rarely be used in real life after the initial “let me test this out on my cat in the dark” moment.
 
This is great for landscape photography, but will be useless with capturing people in the moment without being "smeary." It seems like an easy software implementation to just tell the camera to keep the exposure open for 5 seconds just like any other mirrorless or DSLR camera.

Now if this works with "instant shutter" then I'll be blown away.

I pretty much agree with that analysis. It could just be a gimmick that few people could duplicate with enough steadiness or without a stand, but if those are handheld shots, then Apple really missed something here.
 
Apple getting embarrassed by Google with the camera now, SAD!!
I found Smart HDR much more usefull and interesting. This is pretty interesting and since it is software we will see similar things in iOS or apps. Taking photos at night and turn it into day photos is pretty stupid anyway, but taking photos in low light and be able see details is indeed a great thing.
 
Why didn't Apple come up with this idea first?
Apple is the world most innovative company in history, they have a very long record of "world first..." or "best ...."
But they are not gods, it is nice that someone else can push good things.
 
  • Like
Reactions: H3LL5P4WN
Couldn't Google just give you both the original lighting and the altered image and let you choose which one, similar to HDR on iphones? No one said this is overriding your intended low-light shots.

Like I said, I don't have one nor did I watch Google's presentation, so I don't know that they do that. It'd make sense if they did.

This is the most ridiculous thing I have ever read. If Apple introduced this you would think it was amazing. And rightly so.

Mmmmnah, no I wouldn't for the reasons I've outlined previously.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ikir
That's something I doubt Apple would do instead of their pattern of only the best features for the current iPhone's - but is something Apple should do once they figure out how to emulate this.
Apple push features to older devices every time they can if it has sense and doesn't run so bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: H3LL5P4WN
I... I don't think I can get behind this.

If I'm shooting at night, it's for a reason. I'd much rather have a camera capable of rendering what I'm actually seeing versus one that can apply a filter to turn night into day. This is essentially the same kind of thing that Prism does, turning a photo into "art." It's no longer reality.

Is that not what “Night Sight” trying to do? Current cameras generally see at least half of what our eyes see in low light and pixelate the results. If you mean total darkness, then what would be the point of the photo. From the examples, I would give Google a thumbs up at trying to accomplish what you want.
 
  • Like
Reactions: imtoomuch
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.