Definitely not a PSA 10 card, but I guess as an autograph, sure...the grade on the slab is for the autograph. As always with graded items, you still need to look at the actual item and never take the grade at "face value".
There is a possibility that that card wasn't signed by Jobs as well. You can only trust whomever claims it's authentic.I understand your point, but why would jobs have signed a fake business card?
With the exception of Nvidia, all of them pay dividends, with IBM leading the pack at 2.6%. Reinvest those dividends, and you're getting compound interest, while you watch the stocks head north. I bought 160 shares of IBM on November 16, 2021 at $119.55/share. The dividend at that time was 5.5%, so pretty much a no-brainer. Today, those shares are selling at $254.80. And thanks to reinvesting the dividends, I now have 176.947 shares. That's 17 shares at no cost, Multiply that by $254.80, and I received $4,331.60 just from the dividends, and the total value over those 3 years is $45,064.20 on a cost basis of $19,619.83. for a total gain of 129.61% over those 3 years and two months.IBM? Interesting suggestion.
I agree. A staple gole mark is early visible on the card. You’re paying for the signature not the card quality in this case.I'm a sports card nut and a pedant, so I'd like to correct part of this article. A PSA-graded card carrying a GEM MT 10 rating does indeed denote a flawless card. However, this authentication was done by PSA/DNA, which is their autograph authenticating arm. This is denoted on the label itself, as well as the label having a blue border rather than a red one. This means that the card itself may as well be a square of Charmin rather than a business card, as it only grades the authenticity and flawlessness of the autograph without taking the medium it rests on into consideration.
Yeah i'd rather go for TSM, especially as they're making processors for two of those companies.IBM? Interesting suggestion.
No, I meant to keep it in the holder and mask around it to only show the card.Wouldn't be a good idea. An inadequate frame would allow light to damage it and allowing removal will allow skin oils and air contamination to damage it.
Anyone buying this is using it as an investment of some kind so they'd want it preserved so it maintains its value.
How would a photo of him signing something be proof? It wouldn't guarantee that it would be the card in question.A photo of Jobs signing or it didn't happen.
Why on earth would anyone pay a single cent, knowing that it might not be a real signature. PSA are paid for evaluating and it's just that,..a person's opinion on the likelihood and NOT a guarantee of authenticity.