Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

jdavtz

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
I'm thinking of upgrading my 2008 iMac C2D.

Searching online for 6770m 6790m gives me nothing that I can make sense of about these GPUs. Anyone have a link with relative performances?

The thing is, I'm NOT really looking at gaming -- that's way down my list of importance.

I primarily use Aperture (21MP RAW files). Now I know that Aperture heavily uses the GPU, but I wonder just how much difference there is between the GPU models (and memory amounts - 512MB vs. 1GB vs. 2GB)

I was thinking of 27" i7 3.4GHz with the 2GB card, but then wondered, "would I be okay with the 21.5" i7 2.8 with the 6770M GPU (with only 512 MB VRAM)".

If I bought the 21.5" it would be much easier to afford a nice 27" NEC PA271W monitor (£1000-ish) (2560x1440) -- BUT would the 6770M/512MB GPU really be good for running moderately intensive Aperture work over the two screens (21.5" + 27")?

Cross-posting in photography forum - hope that's not a problem.
 
I had read that thread, but as far as I can see there's no mention at all of Aperture's performance regarding different GPUs, nor how well a 512MB card will perform running a second fairly high-resolution display as well as doing however much processing Aperture does offload to the GPU.
 
From the barefeats test:

As for the GPU, according to Hardware Monitor, none of the four tests put more than a 4% load on it.
 
Thanks. I have to admit I didn't read that linked test.

So all the stuff about Aperture utilising GPU is nonsense?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.