Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
In all fairness, the game runs much better than I thought on the i5 MBA 2020, the only thing is after an hour or so it becomes really slow, I assume it's because of the RAM. If it runs even remotely better on the M1, that's the only thing I need and I'll make the transition.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jimmy James
steam worked but none of the games seemed to start in the live unboxing “Heads of tech“ is doing on YouTube. Could be something with the steam client not being a fan of Rosettas translation at first start.
I wonder if it might work if someone went into the Steam library folder direct and launched the app from there? Might 'trigger' the Rosetta 2 translation?
 
In all fairness, the game runs much better than I thought on the i5 MBA 2020, the only thing is after an hour or so it becomes really slow, I assume it's because of the RAM. If it runs even remotely better on the M1, that's the only thing I need and I'll make the transition.
It could be RAM running out, or it could be CPU throttling as it reaches its thermal limit.

One of the things I have my fingers crossed for is that the M1 will throttle less obnoxiously than Intel chips, which in my experience tank the performance and then inefficiently bounce back and forth between throttling and normal operation. If M1 can just smoothly transition to a lower consistent clock speed and stay there, I think a lot of the issues associated with throttling would disappear.
 
I wonder if it might work if someone went into the Steam library folder direct and launched the app from there? Might 'trigger' the Rosetta 2 translation?
The game started jumping which I guess indicates Rosetta but then nothing more happened. I guess we can see more people trying in the coming hours but Steam have all sorts of processes going on when you start a game so I guess things can fail.
 
Can someone just run a benchmark within any recent game and show us the results? Have been reading through a lot of tech discussion and now tired of beating around the bush
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smici
I have installed steam/cities and it installs and runs ok. I don't normally play it so I don't have any cities to try it with, but the basic maps seem quite smooth.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: Smici and Tafkaeken
I have installed steam/cities and it installs and runs ok. I don't normally play it so I don't have any cities to try it with, but the basic maps seem quite smooth.
Can you tell the graphics settings? It’s hitting 60 fps?
 
Sorry, I don't know how to see the FPS. tried turning it on in steam, but I am not seeing it in the game. the settings are:
tempImageT8QGut.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smici and Tafkaeken
yes it is Cities Skyline. It feels smooth, though this is an empty map with no buildings.
Skylines uses a lot of CPU power to simulate cars and pedestrians, so having a 20k population is when it gets really slow. If it's interesting to you, you can find pre-made cities (look for some without mods, because it's a pain to make them work) in the workshop. But it's usually heavily utilizing just 2-4 cores and if you have more, it does use them, but not heavily. So a perfect match for a 4+4 with good single-core performance 😀. It should run just fine (mostly depending on Rosetta performance), but it uses a lot of RAM.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smici
Skylines uses a lot of CPU power to simulate cars and pedestrians, so having a 20k population is when it gets really slow. If it's interesting to you, you can find pre-made cities (look for some without mods, because it's a pain to make them work) in the workshop. But it's usually heavily utilizing just 2-4 cores and if you have more, it does use them, but not heavily. So a perfect match for a 4+4 with good single-core performance 😀. It should run just fine (mostly depending on Rosetta performance), but it uses a lot of RAM.
I installed a city called pig iron. looks fairly big. The FPS drops to 20-30fps at 1650 x 1050. It is still very responsive and in my opinion quite playable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sanpete
I installed a city called pig iron. looks fairly big. The FPS drops to 20-30fps at 1650 x 1050. It is still very responsive and in my opinion quite playable.
maybe with medium settings? :)
 
maybe with medium settings? :)
Even at the lowest settings it is not getting above 30fps. Something is not right though. I am not seeing any animations within the scenario. As I have been focused on performance rather than the game, I was not looking game it in detail. I am not sure it is working properly.

I did get an error when I first installed the game saying it did not have permission to save to a location. I wonder if that is the issue. It will take more time than I have at the moment to look into this more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sanpete
Even at the lowest settings it is not getting above 30fps. Something is not right though. I am not seeing any animations within the scenario. As I have been focused on performance rather than the game, I was not looking game it in detail. I am not sure it is working properly.

I did get an error when I first installed the game saying it did not have permission to save to a location. I wonder if that is the issue. It will take more time than I have at the moment to look into this more.
Actually pretty incredible if it is running 20-30FPS on a huge city - believe me, Skylines runs slow FPS on my desktop 9700K with 2060 SUPER. Your graphic settings are not the limit here - it's CPU bound game on all machines regardless of rendering settings - this is all about it rendering cars/pedestrians. This is MBA or MBP m1?
 
Actually pretty incredible if it is running 20-30FPS on a huge city - believe me, Skylines runs slow FPS on my desktop 9700K with 2060 SUPER. Your graphic settings are not the limit here - it's CPU bound game on all machines regardless of rendering settings - this is all about it rendering cars/pedestrians. This is MBA or MBP m1?
Its an MBA. The issue is it is not rendering the cars/pedestrians. The game appears to work in that the city can be loaded and explored, but there is no animation and no progress. You can add roads, building etc, but no-one comes to the city etc. It may just be that it is not installed correctly, but I tried re-installing it and it still did the same (but it also remembered previous settings so obviously didn't completely uninstall.

I tried Civilization VI as well and that works fine at a solid 60fps, but is not so challenging graphically, but shows steam games do work.
 
I tried Civilization VI as well and that works fine at a solid 60fps, but is not so challenging graphically, but shows steam games do work.
UMMMMMM...WHAT! My favorite game! What settings, rez??? Did you run the gathering storm or basic benchmark? I find it hard to believe it's running at 60FPS! Civ VI is another CPU limited game - I have a Dell XPS 13 9310 with i5-1135G7 Iris Xe chip and it is running the gathering storm benchmark at ~65ms average at the end.

Also - in cities skylines - did you hit space bar in game to resume time. By default, maps load with time paused - you may just need to hit space bar to get time moving to see everything moving. I loaded a 25K city on my gaming PC, and at 1440P, max settings, zoomed out I'm at 45-60FPS, but zoomed in close, or any camera angle that is more level (looking at the horizon) the FPS can drop to 30FPS pretty easily. This game is just CPU bound and folks get used to running the city at 20-30FPS most of the time. I'm no pro though.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.