Seagate's 3TB and 4TB "Laptop HDD" are 15mm high.
That is not how this branding has worked.
Any "external" logic is rubbish.
Ultrabooks are crap, not the traditional meaning of laptop.You could just as well argue that 9.5mm drives don't fit a large number of ultrabooks, so to brand a 9.5mm drive as a 'laptop' drive is rubbish branding as well.
Ultrabooks are crap, not the traditional meaning of laptop.
Yes. All current Apple laptops are underpowered crap.Ultrabooks are the essence of what a laptop should be. Laptop = portable computer. The more portable and the more powerful they are, the closer they are to what a laptop should be. Unless you think MacBook Airs are crap too?
Regardless, if you want a 'traditional' meaning of a laptop, you can buy a bulky Alienware that has weight and thickness deeply resembling my '90s ThinkPad. Oh, and it'd fit a 15mm HDD.![]()
Yes. All current Apple laptops are underpowered crap.
Of course you hit the bottleneck on an MBP. The SSD is small and 4 cores are not enough (although the latter only resolved in huge "laptops").
Yes, I max out that sort of thing.
There should be no excessively thin laptops, that's the point. A normal one would still be 4-core.
What I would like is a 6-core Xeon laptop that weighs no more than 3.3Kg, as 5Kg for 12-core is too much. Even if it's still weak.
No need for mobile processor. There are Xeon laptops with 6 to 12 cores, but they are not very mobile.
Eurocom had 12-core Xeon, 5Kg, 30 minutes battery laptops for example.
But now they make lighter mobile Xeon laptops.
Any way, the biggest problem of the rMBP are not taking a 2.5" drive and the removal of ports.