Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Greek Woman Immolates British Mans Privates

robbieduncan said:
Sounds like he being something of a cock and, on balance, probably got what was coming to him
Click to expand...

So had the roles been reversed and she was harassing him, you'd be OK with setting her genitals on fire? I mean, she would have had it coming after all.
 
CorvusCamenarum said:
So had the roles been reversed and she was harassing him, you'd be OK with setting her genitals on fire? I mean, she would have had it coming after all.
Click to expand...

Had she removed her trousers, waved her privates around (OK, slightly difficult), groped him and asked him to grab her exposed genitals, been asked to stop, had her genitals doused in alcohol to try and get rid of her and still not stopped?
 
That's messed up in all sorts of ways. Sounds like they're both a couple of twunts who took things too far.


FWIW, robbie, I figured someone from the PC police of literalism excess would leap on you for that comment, but I knew what you meant.
 
Getting a VD would have been easier for him to treat. Now his junk burns even when he doesn't pee.

I agree that had this been reversed the public sentiment would be much more extreme against the man doing the burning. It's the new "gender discount" I've been reading about.

Not all men welcome that kind of behavior from women.
 
All he had to do...

All he had to do to put out the fire is PULL UP HIS PANTS.

I do not agree, that if the roles were reversed, that it would be any different. However, the reverse would never happen. For one thing the men were there for the sex. Unless the woman was butt ugly, no guy would turn her down. ;)
 
ThorsHammer said:
All he had to do to put out the fire is PULL UP HIS PANTS.

I do not agree, that if the roles were reversed, that it would be any different. However, the reverse would never happen. For one thing the men were there for the sex. Unless the woman was butt ugly, no guy would turn her down. ;)
Click to expand...

Right, and the pants wouldn't set on fire either? Yeah, I guess that when you get set on fire, you're supposed to stop, pull up your pants, and burn yourself more.

And some guys actually have morals. Apparently not in your case.
 
pelicanflip said:
Right, and the pants wouldn't set on fire either? Yeah, I guess that when you get set on fire, you're supposed to stop, pull up your pants, and burn yourself more.

And some guys actually have morals. Apparently not in your case.
Click to expand...

No, he's definitely right. Once the pants had ben pulled up the supply of oxygen would be stopped and the fire put out.

Its the same reason you're supposed to roll on the ground when on fire. Or put a blanket over an open flame to put it out
 
Hmmm...she told him to stop harassing her, but he didn't. I'm guessing he didn't understand. As another famous Briton, William Shakespeare, once wrote: "but, for mine own part, it was Greek to me.";)

Graecum est; non potest legi
 
Mr. lax said:
No, he's definitely right. Once the pants had ben pulled up the supply of oxygen would be stopped and the fire put out.

Its the same reason you're supposed to roll on the ground when on fire. Or put a blanket over an open flame to put it out
Click to expand...

Pants are flammable so they would catch on fire, plus are you saying when your wearing pants there's absolutely no oxygen in that area? That is completely false.

When you roll on the ground the ground isn't supposed to be flammable or when you put a blanket over an open flame you're supposed to use a fire blanket which is flame retardant.
 
So that's what the Kings of Leon meant.

NO! Sexual mutilation is pretty ******, other than the Russian woman lifting stuff with her bits I've never seen any jollyness aimed at mutilation of a womans bits on this forum. Funny that! Lets all start a thread on female circumcision and laugh and smile and glee around. Ok I'm done p**sing on this thread :eek:.
 
maybe she'd had a little too much of this off greek men over the years, turned into a man hater as a result and that guy was doing the most inappropriate thing to the worst possible person he could have:-

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=greek

It's only text obviously but still wouldn't be suitable for people who are easily offended (which probably doesn't include many people interested in a thread about torching some guys junk)

:D
 
pelicanflip said:
Right, and the pants wouldn't set on fire either? Yeah, I guess that when you get set on fire, you're supposed to stop, pull up your pants, and burn yourself more.
Click to expand...

Furi Kuri said:
Pants are flammable so they would catch on fire, plus are you saying when your wearing pants there's absolutely no oxygen in that area? That is completely false.

When you roll on the ground the ground isn't supposed to be flammable or when you put a blanket over an open flame you're supposed to use a fire blanket which is flame retardant.
Click to expand...

Are you guys serious?

Granted it was quite a few years ago, but I don't remember the firemen telling me in elementary school to "stop, look for a fire resistant floor, drop and roll".

Of course you can smother a flame without using fire retardant materials. I've smothered flames with regular blankets, my shoes and even my hands at one point or another.

Obviously it all depends on the size of the flame, and the fuel involved, but it can definitely be done. I'm no fire expert, but I'm fairly certain this guy could have put the flames out using his pants. It's not like the pants would have spontaneously combusted.

You two need to play with fire some more before you criticize others. ;)


...back on topic... The guy got what he deserved. I feel every sex offender needs to have his junk cut off, or her bajingo removed.
 
evilgEEk said:
A
...back on topic... The guy got what he deserved. I feel every sex offender needs to have his junk cut off, or her bajingo removed.
Click to expand...

I suppose thieves need to have their hands cut off too?

Back to the article, In the UK it is a time honoured tradition that a man gets hits old boy out and waves it around, so I think that the woman should have had a greater respect for his cultural customs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back