A more accurate score would be 4.
Okay, so admittedly I make a living off of Macs, so I am a little biased. But, I am an environmentalist over a Mac enthusiast, so I feel equal in the comment.
The way I figure it Apple scores about a 4 , not the 2.7 Greenpeace gave them. While I do not know the details of every piece, here's why i think the score should be my way :
Precautionary Principle : GP 1, Me 1 - Okay, I don't know enough about this to warrant a change in Greenpeace's judgement.
Chemicals Management : GP 1, Me 1.3 - This is a bit of faith on my part in Apple. Greenpeace gave Apple a 1 because they would not publicly release their information. Apple has never publicly released information about their operations more than they had to. Assuming that Apple is legit in their operations warrants them my 1.3 instead of 1.
Timeline for PVC phaseout : GP 1, Me 1.3 - Again, Greenpeace's main problem is that Apple did not lay out a timeline. Apple could do better here, but they have made a commitment to, just not releasing a timeline (again back to the Apple not leaking information thing). If Samsung can score a 2 for having what Greenpeace says is a "unreasonable" timeline for phaseout, I believe Apple deserves at least a quarter if not a half point tolerance.
Timeline for BFR phaseout : GP 0, Me 1 - Greenpeace kinda annoys me here. They knocked Apple for not telling them essentially. Nokia gets a 2 for not having any timeline for removal of remaining BFR and Dell gets a 3 for committing to a 2009 timeline. Apple was docked solely for not revealing it's information. I am giving them a 1 because they have moved to metal frames for their Mac Pro (thus reducing need for fire retardant) and the previously mentioned secrecy of Apple.
Support for Individual Producer Responsibility : GP 1, Me 2 - Apple has moved forward with accepting all electronics regardless of manufacturer, and does not charge the recycling plant for Apple's waste, and comply with all laws "regarding this issue".
Voluntary take back where no EPR laws exist : GP 1, Me 1 - This is one area where Apple could step it up a little. I would love to see the actual percentage breakdown of Apple units sold where there is no EPR law.
Provides info for individual customers on takeback in all countries where products are sold : GP 1, Me 2 - If there isn't an Apple store in your COUNTRY you might have a problem recycling things to Apple. Really, what does GP want, Apple to pay for shipping of old electronics to another country? Wouldn't that be a waste of resources? Yes, Apple could do a little bit better, but again I would love to see a breakdown of what countries Apple sells their products to and the percentage or unit breakdown.
Reports on amount of waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) collected and recycled : GP 2, Me 2.4 - Apple reports based on weight, not percentage. And GP recognizes that Apple does have good WEEE recycling ideology.