gs6 gets bencmarked 5400+ multi core

Discussion in 'Alternatives to iOS and iOS Devices' started by skratch77, Jan 27, 2015.

  1. skratch77 macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2013
    #1
    looks like Samsung has a crazy fast exynos soc about to hit the streets,if these are true its the fastest soc out and its only at 1.5ghz not the full speed the final will run at
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Natzoo macrumors 65816

    Natzoo

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2014
    Location:
    Not sure where i am
  3. skratch77, Jan 27, 2015
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2015

    skratch77 thread starter macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2013
    #3
    2800!

    this is no joke the note 4 gets 2900 multi core with the snapdragon 805.They have also doubled the cpu performance going from the gs5 to the gs6
     
  4. Fanaticalism macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2013
    #4
    I'm more impressed by the single core which has never been a strength in chipsets found in android devices.
     
  5. skratch77 thread starter macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2013
    #5
    just wait until we see final version running at 2.1ghz lol

    looks like samsungs 14nm is going to kill snapsragons 20nm 810 this round
     
  6. Lloydbm41 macrumors 68040

    Lloydbm41

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2013
    Location:
    Central California
    #6
    Exactly. This is of more significance in my opinion.
     
  7. mclld macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2012
    #7
    YAWN @ spec wars. Phones have been more than capable the past few years for the average users
     
  8. Natzoo macrumors 65816

    Natzoo

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2014
    Location:
    Not sure where i am
  9. ucfgrad93 macrumors P6

    ucfgrad93

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2007
    Location:
    Colorado
    #9
    Agreed. For the vast majority of the people, phones have enough horsepower to get the job done.
     
  10. Lloydbm41 macrumors 68040

    Lloydbm41

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2013
    Location:
    Central California
    #10
    Not spec wars in this particular case in my view. The improvement from the 18-20nm chips to 14nm in sheer speed is what impresses me. This is the same process Apple is going to be using for the A9 chip.
     
  11. Technarchy macrumors 603

    Technarchy

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    #11
    Exynos? Samsung hasn't done with Exynos for the American market in awhile. I imagine the qualcomm iteration won't be that far behind though.
     
  12. rhinosrcool macrumors 65816

    rhinosrcool

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2009
    Location:
    MN
    #12
    The story is that the Qualcomm 810 has an overheating issue. Some say that LG G Flex overheats. LG has denied this. Also, word is that samsung's exynos has vastly improved. Since the LG G Flex will debut soon (in Korea), we could get results that show it either does or doesn't; or we get faulty data because the hardware in the LG G Flex is different from Samsung's or another OEM's?
     
  13. mi7chy macrumors 68040

    mi7chy

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2014
    #13
    Architecturally the two are so similar now that I'd go with 14nm to avoid thermal throttling which sounds like what's happening with Snapdragon 810 built on TSMC 20nm. Same reason Apple was quick to jump back to Samsung fab.
     
  14. Jibbajabba macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2011
    #14
    Queue in people complaining about battery life. Still gonna get it lol ... Can't wait.
     
  15. MRU macrumors demi-god

    MRU

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2005
    Location:
    Other
    #15
    I just hope the rumours of a stripped back Touchwiz are true. In the past Samsung relied on brute force to muscle it's way through the Touchwiz UI rather than optimise it.

    The other rumor coming out is the GS6 will feature customisable back plates such as inductive charging, or possibly an e-ink display, or extra S-Health back panel with blood sugar etc...
     
  16. diamond.g macrumors 603

    diamond.g

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2007
    Location:
    Virginia
    #16
    I wonder how much of that bump has to do with ARM8 vs ARM7v (basically 64b vs 32b).
     
  17. skratch77 thread starter macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2013
    #17
    This should also be using ddr 4 so I'm sure that adds some also
     
  18. Tsepz macrumors 65816

    Tsepz

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2013
    Location:
    Johannesburg, South Africa
    #18
    That is great, can't wait to see what the Note 5's chip will be capable of, it's going to be an exciting year. :)
     
  19. mKTank macrumors 68000

    mKTank

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2010
    #19
    Geekbench is a pretty poor teller of real world performance, though. Keep in mind that it usually greatly contrasts other benchmarks which use graphics, physics, etc. (actual gameplay) to stress the hardware and get a score.
     
  20. skratch77 thread starter macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2013
    #20
    Geekbench is a great CPU benchmark
     
  21. mKTank macrumors 68000

    mKTank

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2010
    #21
    Not indicative of real world performance in any way. Totally useless for telling how fast a phone will be at...being a phone.

    Unless all you do on your smartphones is calculate primes.
     
  22. mattopotamus macrumors G5

    mattopotamus

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2012
    #22
    what tangible difference will this make with usage?
     
  23. skratch77 thread starter macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2013
    #23
    Coming from a gs3,gs4,gs5 user I know very well how this will preform in real world usage and Iv also moded all them and even over clocked most of them to know how well they preform using geekbench as a base for testing.

    The gs6 is going to absolutely fly with this much raw horsepower
     
  24. jrswizzle macrumors 603

    jrswizzle

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2012
    Location:
    McKinney, TX
    #24
    Will be interesting to see how this 2015 Exynos stacks up against the 2015 A9.

    Also, will this chipset be available on the phones headed here to the US? Seems like the fastest devices are always relegated to SK and the UK....

    ----------

    Regardless it gives a good comparison of devices as the test is the same across a variety of tech.

    So regardless of what that 5400 number actually means, comparing this 5400 to the 4800 of the A9X offers some insight into comparative horsepower.

    ----------

    Also made by Samsung.

    Seems like Samsung and TSMC have alternating processes. The A10 will likely be TSMC's 10(?) nm process while Samsung works on something smaller.

    ----------

    Single Core still lags behind the 6+ (benched at roughly 1600).

    That multi-core score is impressive and on par with the early 2014 MacBook Air running an i5-4260U.
     
  25. mi7chy macrumors 68040

    mi7chy

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2014
    #25
    Not only performance but also screen-on time and idle battery life.
     

Share This Page