Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Its not,(I mean it is proprietary) just no one has really thought about it, or thought that it would be profitable. I'm sure there are some cases out there like this. I remember doing a Kickstarter that was a lightning connector with a magnetic disconnect.
I'm positive that I don't believe that.
 
nope.
From Apple’s sales page.
The MagSafe Charger maintains compatibility with Qi charging, so it can be used to wirelessly charge your iPhone 8 or later, as well as AirPods models with a wireless charging case, as you would with any Qi-certified charger.
I see. Well I guess they're not willing to give up potential sales there despite this being clearly a poor choice for anyone with anything other than iPhone 12.
 
We all know this is the stepping-stone to a portless iPhone. This allows the phone to be charged WHILE using it, unlike Qi.
Why is a portless iPhone treated like such an inevitability? I highly doubt Apple feels the same way. The Lighting port is simply too useful to be traded off for whatever hypothetical improvements could come from a portless iPhone.

- Better water/dust resistance: Does it even need this? It can already survive under water for quite some time. That's more than adequate.

- Generic unnamed engineering gains from additional free space: Sure, we're fully aware that removing unused components from this small space open up new design possibilities. But unless we know what those are, we can't really advocate for it.

There are so many aspects of iPhone that are not ready for a permanent wireless experience that I don't see this happening the way others seem to. Some people seem to think that AirPods + a decent wireless charger = no need for a physical tether at all and that's simply not true.
 
I see. Well I guess they're not willing to give up potential sales there despite this being clearly a poor choice for anyone with anything other than iPhone 12.

How is this a poor choice? It’s not the most economical choice for standard Qi charging, but it sounds like it works fine.

If you like the design of this more than the 3rd-party alternatives, and/or you think you might get into the Apple ecosystem in the next few years, there’s nothing wrong with choosing this option.
 
How is this a poor choice? It’s not the most economical choice for standard Qi charging, but it sounds like it works fine.

If you like the design of this more than the 3rd-party alternatives, and/or you think you might get into the Apple ecosystem in the next few years, there’s nothing wrong with choosing this option.
Because it looks like a very poor design if the magnet is not in play. It's far too small to be a normal Qi charger if the magnet is not being used to aid in positioning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ignatius345
My wife always prefers to get cases with fun designs. I hope some of the “designer” case brands will implement MagSafe functionality. In the meantime, I got her a caudabe lucid clear.

Ha, that's funny. That's exactly what I did. Wife got a Caudabe Lucid Clear, I got a Caudabe Sheath. The MagSafe stuff is pretty "meh" to us.
 
Because it looks like a very poor design if the magnet is not in play. It's far too small to be a normal Qi charger if the magnet is not being used to aid in positioning.

Not seeing the issue. By virtue of it working with Qi at all, we can assume it meets the “normal” minimum coil size.

As far as how devices sit on it or deal with the magnets, I’ll hold my assumptions until I handle one in real life.
 
wait what?!!! The rings on that case aren’t supposed to be magnetic but rather allow for the iPhone 12’s magnetic pull to go through. What am I missing here??
 
Why is a portless iPhone treated like such an inevitability? I highly doubt Apple feels the same way. The Lighting port is simply too useful to be traded off for whatever hypothetical improvements could come from a portless iPhone.

- Better water/dust resistance: Does it even need this? It can already survive under water for quite some time. That's more than adequate.

- Generic unnamed engineering gains from additional free space: Sure, we're fully aware that removing unused components from this small space open up new design possibilities. But unless we know what those are, we can't really advocate for it.

There are so many aspects of iPhone that are not ready for a permanent wireless experience that I don't see this happening the way others seem to. Some people seem to think that AirPods + a decent wireless charger = no need for a physical tether at all and that's simply not true.
I agree with your points and I very much hope you're right.

But this is after all the company that got rid of the headphone jack and, with a straight face, sold a MacBook with a single USB-C port that was also the only way to charge the battery. This is also the company that for several years put one of the worst keyboards in recent memory into its flagship laptops. I would not at all put it past them to sell a sealed glass slab and say "deal with it" to anyone who wants to plug their phone into anything else.
 
Would it really have killed you all to have waited until you had actually had the new iPhones in hand so that you could have made a video that's useful?
They saw 400+ comments on another thread and scrambling a video. 🤣
 
Last edited:
I think the MagSafe puck can be used in any orientation. It's circular... so it shouldn't matter what direction the cable is.

But... the MagSafe puck is probably not the best charger for nightstand charging duties. According to Apple's marketing videos... it looks like it's designed to stay attached to the phone when you use the phone.

That's the exact opposite of what I want from a Qi charger. I don't want the charger to stick to the phone when I grab it from the nightstand.

:p
You prefer to needlessly remove your phone from its external power supply?
 
I would not have figured that this would've worked. Still though, I can wait until I have a MagSafe iPhone to get MagSafe. So long as I put it on the charger before going to sleep, Qi should be sufficient.

Qi is still plenty sufficient, and consumers will likely to opt for the cheap Amazon third party chargers before they pay Apples price. However, in terms of convenience, MagSafe is an entirely different application.
 
I’m a little confused at the thought of this being designed for a nightstand. The cable is meant to go down the bottom of the phone. So you either have the cable going over the front of your nightstand (and drawer if you have one); or, you need to place the bottom of your phone facing the wall to allow the cable to go behind the nightstand.
I don’t think there is any fixed alignment. The puck is round after all.
 
You prefer to needlessly remove your phone from its external power supply?

If I pick up my phone from a Qi charger... I don't want the charger to come with it. :)

This MagSafe charger, however, is designed to stick to the phone. It's got magnets. It's a different type of charger. That's what I was explaining to the previous poster.
 
Thats. The. Point.

Apple wants this for a specific reason - to dump the lightening port in the future (I'd guess iPhone 14), but already have the tools in place to offers a "wireless" charging experience not reliant on Qi (where it has to be on a pad to charge). MagSafe lets you charge AND use the phone at the same time, unlike Qi.
If that's the point, it's not a very good one.
1m cord is way too short.
Charging speeds are really slower and inefficient (wasted power/heat in Qi-based charging)
Qi can absolutely charge the device while it's being used, just not conveniently in the hand. If that was the intent, they would've made a much longer cable.
 
hmmmm, can any company (i.e. Apple or third party) make a MagSafe compatible case for older iPhone? I don't mind the charging power is not at maximum (15W) for older iPhone. I purely love the idea of magnet case which allow the charger or some accessory like the card pouch attached firmly.
 
No wall connector in a $39 wireless charger.

Also - its important to point out the hypocrisy of apple ditching wall chargers ”for the environment” and then pushing the inefficient wireless charging which results in power loss and therefore more power needed to charge the device. Wireless charging is “bad for the environment” by Apples logic.

Only companies like Apple can make so many robust claims about being so eco-friendly and so on and so on...... But yet at the same time they just keep increasing their profits year to year by providing less but charging more $$$. In this case it's about the lack of a wall charger in all iPhone 12 boxes buy yet they're advising their customers to buy their $20 20W charger to get optimal charging speeds.

Again, only Apple......
 
  • Like
Reactions: ani4ani
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.