I'm positive that I don't believe that.Its not,(I mean it is proprietary) just no one has really thought about it, or thought that it would be profitable. I'm sure there are some cases out there like this. I remember doing a Kickstarter that was a lightning connector with a magnetic disconnect.
I see. Well I guess they're not willing to give up potential sales there despite this being clearly a poor choice for anyone with anything other than iPhone 12.nope.
From Apple’s sales page.
The MagSafe Charger maintains compatibility with Qi charging, so it can be used to wirelessly charge your iPhone 8 or later, as well as AirPods models with a wireless charging case, as you would with any Qi-certified charger.
Why is a portless iPhone treated like such an inevitability? I highly doubt Apple feels the same way. The Lighting port is simply too useful to be traded off for whatever hypothetical improvements could come from a portless iPhone.We all know this is the stepping-stone to a portless iPhone. This allows the phone to be charged WHILE using it, unlike Qi.
I see. Well I guess they're not willing to give up potential sales there despite this being clearly a poor choice for anyone with anything other than iPhone 12.
Because it looks like a very poor design if the magnet is not in play. It's far too small to be a normal Qi charger if the magnet is not being used to aid in positioning.How is this a poor choice? It’s not the most economical choice for standard Qi charging, but it sounds like it works fine.
If you like the design of this more than the 3rd-party alternatives, and/or you think you might get into the Apple ecosystem in the next few years, there’s nothing wrong with choosing this option.
My wife always prefers to get cases with fun designs. I hope some of the “designer” case brands will implement MagSafe functionality. In the meantime, I got her a caudabe lucid clear.
Because it looks like a very poor design if the magnet is not in play. It's far too small to be a normal Qi charger if the magnet is not being used to aid in positioning.
Agreed. But technically isn’t it $58 now?Just to say it, $69 for an iPhone charger (after you add the wall adapter) is getting a little bit silly...
I agree with your points and I very much hope you're right.Why is a portless iPhone treated like such an inevitability? I highly doubt Apple feels the same way. The Lighting port is simply too useful to be traded off for whatever hypothetical improvements could come from a portless iPhone.
- Better water/dust resistance: Does it even need this? It can already survive under water for quite some time. That's more than adequate.
- Generic unnamed engineering gains from additional free space: Sure, we're fully aware that removing unused components from this small space open up new design possibilities. But unless we know what those are, we can't really advocate for it.
There are so many aspects of iPhone that are not ready for a permanent wireless experience that I don't see this happening the way others seem to. Some people seem to think that AirPods + a decent wireless charger = no need for a physical tether at all and that's simply not true.
They saw 400+ comments on another thread and scrambling a video. 🤣Would it really have killed you all to have waited until you had actually had the new iPhones in hand so that you could have made a video that's useful?
Says who?wait what?!!! The rings on that case aren’t supposed to be magnetic but rather allow for the iPhone 12’s magnetic pull to go through. What am I missing here??
You prefer to needlessly remove your phone from its external power supply?I think the MagSafe puck can be used in any orientation. It's circular... so it shouldn't matter what direction the cable is.
But... the MagSafe puck is probably not the best charger for nightstand charging duties. According to Apple's marketing videos... it looks like it's designed to stay attached to the phone when you use the phone.
That's the exact opposite of what I want from a Qi charger. I don't want the charger to stick to the phone when I grab it from the nightstand.
![]()
What’s different than typical Qi charging, which is also called “wireless” for many years and no one complained?This is really stretching the definition of a "wireless" charger. More like a "connection port free" charger.
What’s different than typical Qi charging, which is also called “wireless” for many years and no one complained?
I would not have figured that this would've worked. Still though, I can wait until I have a MagSafe iPhone to get MagSafe. So long as I put it on the charger before going to sleep, Qi should be sufficient.
I don’t think there is any fixed alignment. The puck is round after all.I’m a little confused at the thought of this being designed for a nightstand. The cable is meant to go down the bottom of the phone. So you either have the cable going over the front of your nightstand (and drawer if you have one); or, you need to place the bottom of your phone facing the wall to allow the cable to go behind the nightstand.
What!?! 🤣You can purchase a new Clear Case with MagSafe for $49.00 or better yet $83.25/month for 12 months!
View attachment 969320
You prefer to needlessly remove your phone from its external power supply?
If that's the point, it's not a very good one.Thats. The. Point.
Apple wants this for a specific reason - to dump the lightening port in the future (I'd guess iPhone 14), but already have the tools in place to offers a "wireless" charging experience not reliant on Qi (where it has to be on a pad to charge). MagSafe lets you charge AND use the phone at the same time, unlike Qi.
No wall connector in a $39 wireless charger.
Also - its important to point out the hypocrisy of apple ditching wall chargers ”for the environment” and then pushing the inefficient wireless charging which results in power loss and therefore more power needed to charge the device. Wireless charging is “bad for the environment” by Apples logic.