Become a MacRumors Supporter for $25/year with no ads, private forums, and more!

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
55,464
17,802


LG in December announced the launch of its new 2022 32-inch UltraFine OLED Pro display, and in our latest YouTube video, we went hands-on with it to see how it compares to Apple's Pro Display XDR and whether it might be worth picking up depending on the price point.


Officially named the "32BP95E," the display features a resolution of 3840 x 2160, so it's 4K, and it's OLED with all of the benefits that come with OLED technology. It's technically 31.5 inches, but LG is rounding up to 32.

The LG OLED Pro display is designed for professionals, and it's not unlike the Pro Display XDR in that regard. It boasts impressive color accuracy, and it's limited to 60Hz so it's definitely a display for creatives and not for gaming or content consumption.

It looks similar to most other LG monitors, and it comes with a solid selection of ports like USB-C, 2 DisplayPorts, an HDMI port, three USB-A ports, and a headphone jack. It offers tilt and height adjustment, and it can be used vertically.

There's also a monitor hood to reduce glare and built-in color calibration tools, both of which are upgrades from the prior model, but there are no real standout features even though it does look impressive. Make sure to take a look at our YouTube video for a full feature overview and to see it in action.

LG has not released pricing or provided details on when the display is going to be available, but the prior model cost $4,000, so it's not going to be cheap when it comes out.

For those who might be interested in this display, there are rumors that Apple is working on its own Apple-branded display options that could come out in 2022, so it may be worth holding out on a purchase to see how rumors progress.

Current information indicates that there are 24, 27, and 32-inch displays in the works. The 32-inch display is likely to be a Pro Display XDR replacement, but the smaller displays are expected be more affordable (possibly around ~$2000) and closer to replacements for the now-discontinued Thunderbolt Display.

Article Link: Hands-On With LG's 32-Inch UltraFine OLED Pro Display
 

Realityck

macrumors 68030
Nov 9, 2015
2,894
4,068
Silicon Valley, CA
Guess we have to wait and see what the next XDR monitor is priced at. Both the LG models that were announced that included this model is 4K.

 

ckelley

macrumors regular
Aug 25, 2003
133
176
Austin, TX
Why would you put that thing around it...
To minimize glare from above or other sources around it, very common in color accurate workflows.

That said, wish this monitor came with 120Hz capabilities like their OLED TVs, it would be the perfect replacement for me to have one monitor for work and play connected to my Mac and PC. The smallest OLED TV that LG makes is 48", though the 42" is coming this year it's still too big for me to use while working.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MacLC and mihike

james2538

macrumors regular
Jul 11, 2008
109
174
The 32-inch display is likely to be a Pro Display XDR replacement, but the smaller displays are expected be more affordable (possibly around ~$2000) and closer to replacements for the now-discontinued Thunderbolt Display.

Apple's definition of affordable monitor clearly differs widely from mine. There's no reason this should cost more than the current 27" 5K LG Ultrafine. For gods sake just pull the computer bits out of the iMac and sell that.
 
Last edited:

fs454

macrumors 68000
Dec 7, 2007
1,788
1,461
Los Angeles / Boston
I don't really understand why the prices and specs of these are what they are when 48" 120hz OLEDs are available for a thousand bucks and are incredible panels for the money. Suddenly when you go below 48" it becomes a "monitor" and the price and availability go haywire. I understand that some of these are reference style monitors for color accurate work but that doesn't quite explain why there aren't 24-32" OLEDs for mass market consumption without a hefty pro price tag. Is it just impossible to make these with the same yield due to the pixel density on smaller panels or something? Doesn't seem to hold Apple and the other manufacturers back from making large screen OLED phones and tablets.
 

fs454

macrumors 68000
Dec 7, 2007
1,788
1,461
Los Angeles / Boston
Apple's definition of affordable monitor clearly differs widely from mine.

Just pull the computer bits out of the iMac and sell that. There's no reason this should cost anymore than the cheapest 27" iMac.

I agree here - even a 27" miniLED shouldn't be $2k IMO. I don't understand why monitors are crazy these days - humanity has made affordable LED arrays before and they do it very well with TVs above 48 inches without charging thousands and thousands of dollars.
 

NBAasDOGG

macrumors 6502a
May 27, 2017
614
1,460
Netherlands
I don't really understand why the prices and specs of these are what they are when 48" 120hz OLEDs are available for a thousand bucks and are incredible panels for the money. Suddenly when you go below 48" it becomes a "monitor" and the price and availability go haywire. I understand that some of these are reference style monitors for color accurate work but that doesn't quite explain why there aren't 24-32" OLEDs for mass market consumption without a hefty pro price tag. Is it just impossible to make these with the same yield due to the pixel density on smaller panels or something? Doesn't seem to hold Apple and the other manufacturers back from making large screen OLED phones and tablets.

LG OLED TVs use garbage W-RGB pixels and this monitor uses native RGB pixel layout. Huge difference when it comes to motion, image and text clarity.
 

avichou

macrumors 6502a
Sep 19, 2021
739
210
o
LG OLED TVs use garbage W-RGB pixels and this monitor uses native RGB pixel layout. Huge difference when it comes to motion, image and text clarity.
oh you sure all of LG tvs use w-rgb?

ig it's still better than...what was it again? BRG or sth? like pixels put in different array,used by some BenQ monitors
 

DummyFool

macrumors regular
Jan 15, 2020
209
318
It's not really on the subject but I don't understand why some professionals needs that kind of color accuracy. Maybe because I am a programmer and not an artist. I can understand that you don't want your yellows looking orange and vice versa but this kind of accuracy is probably over 50 times what my eyes could see.
 

JPack

macrumors G3
Mar 27, 2017
8,109
13,798
400 nits
I don't really understand why the prices and specs of these are what they are when 48" 120hz OLEDs are available for a thousand bucks and are incredible panels for the money. Suddenly when you go below 48" it becomes a "monitor" and the price and availability go haywire. I understand that some of these are reference style monitors for color accurate work but that doesn't quite explain why there aren't 24-32" OLEDs for mass market consumption without a hefty pro price tag. Is it just impossible to make these with the same yield due to the pixel density on smaller panels or something? Doesn't seem to hold Apple and the other manufacturers back from making large screen OLED phones and tablets.

For one, OLED TVs don't have anywhere near the brightness of OLED monitors.

OLED TVs claim something like 1,000 nits, but only if a small portion of the screen is bright. The moment you want a large portion of the display to be bright, it drops to around 150 nits or less. These professional monitors can stay at 400 nits even when APL is high.

The second is obviously PPI. It's easy to make a big display with low density pixels.
 

Realityck

macrumors 68030
Nov 9, 2015
2,894
4,068
Silicon Valley, CA
It's not really on the subject but I don't understand why some professionals needs that kind of color accuracy. Maybe because I am a programmer and not an artist. I can understand that you don't want your yellows looking orange and vice versa but this kind of accuracy is probably over 50 times what my eyes could see.
Generally when you are editing/grading/mastering digital shot content you want it to be done as accurate as possible using professional grade monitors, before it is shown on large screens for further screening/proofing of the video or film before release. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert

avichou

macrumors 6502a
Sep 19, 2021
739
210
400 nits


For one, OLED TVs don't have anywhere near the brightness of OLED monitors.

OLED TVs claim something like 1,000 nits, but only if a small portion of the screen is bright. The moment you want a large portion of the display to be bright, it drops to around 150 nits or less. These professional monitors can stay at 400 nits even when APL is high.

The second is obviously PPI. It's easy to make a big display with low density pixels.
tbf brightness of this monitor doesn't look that high either .maybe 400niys with 50% APL ,but still limited to hdr400 which imo sucks a lot

I mean ,as he said, TV can reach 800 nits or more (LG C1) in HDR mode ,which over 25% APL I think?
 

jasoncarle

macrumors 6502
Jan 13, 2006
428
290
Minnesota
It's not really on the subject but I don't understand why some professionals needs that kind of color accuracy. Maybe because I am a programmer and not an artist. I can understand that you don't want your yellows looking orange and vice versa but this kind of accuracy is probably over 50 times what my eyes could see.

Really? You can't figure that out? Your eye is far more sensitive than anything we have developed so far.

 

jasoncarle

macrumors 6502
Jan 13, 2006
428
290
Minnesota
Maybe these companies just need to market these monitors to Apple customers differently...

New tag line, With this monitor you can flex on all your Apple homies at Starbucks who don't have one...
 

CWallace

macrumors G3
Aug 17, 2007
9,519
6,396
Seattle, WA
oh you sure all of LG tvs use w-rgb?

Yes. LG OLED televisions use a white OLED that is then passed through either a Blue, Red or Green filter.

Samsung does something similar with their new QD-OLED panels launched by Sony, where all the pixels use a Blue OLED and then Quantum Dot technology to convert that blue light to Red and Green.

These LG professional monitors use "true" RGB OLEDs from Japan OLED with a Blue OLED, a Red OLED and a Green OLED.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.