Agree with you that higher pixel density would be nice. 5K at 27” is really a sweet spot when it comes to that I think and I understand why Apple went with that for the Studio Display and 5K iMac.116 PPI is really lowwww
The M9 is only 139 PPI
Dell UltraSharp 32 6K (U3224KB) is 218 PPI
In 27" display size I'd go with either big spendy or AOC cheapy
Apple 27" Studio display is 217 PPI
AOC U27P2 27” 4K IPS is also 163 PPI
But having used a display with 120 Hz (and higher) refresh rate I really don’t like being back at a display with 60 Hz. Just moving the arrow pointer around and interacting with the computer becomes a whole new experience due to the smoothness and shorter input lag of having double the refresh rate (and of course how the display itself is built also matters when it comes to this).
Also, while 4K at 32” (16:9) isn’t very good pixel density wise it is better than what we’re used to from 1080p and 1440p displays between 24” and 27” and I also feel I can use the 4K at 32” without scaling without thing being too small – this gives a lot of screen estate for the GUI.
Last edited: