It reminds me of the launch of the iPad. People didn’t understand the product, called it a “Big iPhone.”
...
I don’t much like complaints about expensive technology (not saying that this comment applies to you, but I’ve seen people argue that all new tech should be priced for the masses). There is always going to be bleeding edge tech that not everyone can afford, but even if they can’t afford it, they benefit from it.
It brings the new tech to the people that can afford it, but in the coming years, that tech trickles down to the mid range and budget phones. True tone, laminated screens, touch/face id, promotion, Apple Pencil, etc. All those features started on the high end, end up on the entry level. That is because the people who can’t afford them, benefit from better yield rates as the technology matures. I’m not opposed to a company saying “look, this is the best version of a phon we can make, but it’s priced 2.5x more than our normal flaghsip price. We know we’ll sell fewer units than we’d like, but here it is for those who want and can afford it.”
Anyone remember the $100k flat screens that only basketball players owned?