Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
67,726
38,251



Samsung in February announced its most expensive non-foldable smartphone to date, the Galaxy S20 Ultra, which has a starting price of $1,400, which is $300 higher than the starting price of Apple's $1,099 iPhone 11 Pro Max.



Apple is often criticized for its high price points, but this year, Samsung went above and beyond matching Apple's expensive smartphones. We recently picked up one of Samsung's Galaxy S20 Ultra smartphones to see if it's worth the $1,400 price point.

First off, the S20 Ultra has a 6.9-inch OLED display that looks fantastic. Out of the box, it's set to 1080p with a 60Hz refresh rate, but you can bump that up to a 120Hz refresh rate for super smooth scrolling. If you want to use the QHD setting with a higher resolution, you'll be limited to a 60Hz refresh rate, likely due to battery life concerns.

s20ultradisplay.jpg

The Galaxy S20 Ultra includes 12 to 16GB RAM (16GB for the highest-end option priced at $1,600), 128 or 512GB of storage (again for that $1,600 model), an SD card expansion slot, a Snapdragon 865 processor (Qualcomm's latest and fastest chip), an in-display fingerprint sensor, and a 5,000mAh battery, which offers impressive battery life.

Samsung has also outfitted the Ultra with some impressive cameras, though some of what's new is a little bit gimmicky. There's a 108-megapixel wide-angle lens that can take some great photos, but 108-megapixel images are massive in size and aren't super great when you're taking a bunch of photos and using smartphone storage.

s2ultra108mp.jpg

The lens uses a large sensor that lets in a lot of light to create natural depth of field effects, but we've had some trouble getting the camera to focus properly due to some bugs that Samsung has yet to address.

There's also a 100X Space Zoom feature that's impressive on the surface because it lets you zoom in super far, but a 100X zoom photo isn't actually usable because it's so grainy and unclear. The more modest 30x zoom, though, is quite good.

galaxys20ultrazoom.jpg

You can do 8K recording on the Galaxy S20 Ultra, but with the lack of focus tracking, the huge crop factor, and the large file sizes, it's not really worth it because 4K video is more than suitable and it offers better focusing tools. We're going to do a full camera comparison with the S20 Ultra and the iPhone 11 Pro Max later this week, so make sure to check back for that video.

The S20 Ultra, like the entire S20 lineup, comes with 5G connectivity, which is major selling point. Most people can't really take advantage of 5G networks yet because they're still in the early stages of rolling out, but people who own S20 smartphones will be ready to take advantage of 5G when it's ready.

s20ultrafull.jpg

Right now, 5G is kind of hit or miss. The fastest 5G, mmWave, is limited to some urban areas and suffers from interference from buildings and trees, while 600MHz 5G, designed for rural areas, isn't a whole lot faster than LTE at the current time. 5G is going to get better and it's going to get better quick once 5G is standard across all smartphones, but for now, it's not an entirely necessary feature.

It's not really fair to compare Samsung's February 2020 smartphones with Apple's September 2019 smartphones as Apple is working on upgraded iPhones with specs that better match those found in the S20 lineup, but until those new iPhones come out in fall, Samsung's S20 lineup, and the S20 Ultra in particular, is one of the most powerful smartphones on the market.

Many people may buy their smartphones on plans that split the payments across 24 months and also offer regular upgrades with trade-in, but $1,400 is still a lot to pay even over many months. So is the Galaxy S20 Ultra worth it? No, not for most people.

galaxys20ultraback.jpg

Just like the iPhone 11 Pro Max isn't for every user, the Galaxy S20 Ultra is aimed at those who want the best of the best in terms of specs. We wouldn't recommend the iPhone 11 Pro Max to the average user over the iPhone 11, and the Galaxy S20 Ultra is also not for the average user, which is why Samsung is selling it alongside the $999 S20 and the $1,200 S20+.

What do you think of Samsung's S20 Ultra? Would you shell out that amount of money for a smartphone? Let us know in the comments.

Article Link: Hands-On With Samsung's New S20 Ultra: Is It Worth $1400?
 
I really wish Samsung would just leverage googles camera API. Because this camera could be incredible. Interested to see how gcam runs on this.

The S20+ is looking like it might be my next phone but I want to hold off and see what the pixel 5 will offer.
 
Horrible design. People conned into buying this phone are in for a disappointment

Disagree. Nothing horrible about the hardware. Just nowhere near as performant and streamlined as an iPhone. A more expensive "clunky" experience.
[automerge]1583279319[/automerge]
I really wish Samsung would just leverage googles camera API. Because this camera could be incredible. Interested to see how gcam runs on this.

The S20+ is looking like it might be my next phone but I want to hold off and see what the pixel 5 will offer.

I'm curious why you'd finance the Android camp? Is it a better fit for you? You don't need the stellar cross-device experience offered by iPhone-AppleTV-AppleWatch-Mac?
 
Disagree. Nothing horrible about the hardware. Just nowhere near as performant and streamlined as an iPhone. A more expensive "clunky" experience.
[automerge]1583279319[/automerge]


I'm curious why you'd finance the Android camp? Is it a better fit for you? You don't need the stellar cross-device experience offered by iPhone-AppleTV-AppleWatch-Mac?
Don’t start with me bro. I use whatever device I feel like using. I’m not tied into apples or googles ecosystem. I jump between iOS and android when I feel like it while using Microsoft’s services.
 
Samsung is the worst of all the Apple copycats. Why? Because Samsung first makes commercials that (rightfully) harshly make fun of Apple’s bad design choices such as removing the headphone jack and including a notch. And then afterwards, Samsung copies those exact same bad design choices! Look at this S20, for example, with no headphone jack and the inclusion of a notch.
 
Samsung is the worst of all the Apple copycats. Why? Because Samsung first makes commercials that (rightfully) harshly make fun of Apple’s bad design choices such as removing the headphone jack and including a notch. And then afterwards, Samsung copies those exact same bad design choices! Look at this S20, for example, with no headphone jack and the inclusion of a notch.

Dude, the front of this phone looks way better than the iPhone 11 Pro, with a minimal cutout for the camera and much smaller bezels. Too bad I don't like Android, but the front is gorgeous.

Where I hope Apple doesn't follow through is in the price, but with the rumors about so many OLED models incoming, probably the higher end models will be around this price as well.
 
I would love a telephoto lens on iPhone. Would also love bigger sensors to allow more megapixels (more megapixels without increasing sensor size actually makes the cameras worse). I’d pay $1400 for those improvements.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EndersShadow
Wow, $1,400 starting price. I thought my iPhone was expensive. I hope Apple does not follow as I don't think the extra $300 worth of features sounds worthwhile.
 
  • Like
Reactions: compwiz1202
Wow, $1,400 starting price. I thought my iPhone was expensive. I hope Apple does not follow as I don't think the extra $300 worth of features sounds worthwhile.
At some point the camera gets good enough that I don't need to carry a camera like a Sony RX100 around - at that point it's well worth it. (it will be a long while before the camera can compete with full size sensor devices, of course, but small sensor cameras are within striking distance)
 
  • Like
Reactions: EndersShadow
Great phone, half-baked software. I’d be pretty infuriated if I paid 1.4k on a phone that can’t do what the ad says. I can’t say Apple doesn’t do the same since they delay the feature the iPhone was marketed. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
  • Like
Reactions: EndersShadow
I love that Samsung keeps pushing specs like this. Apple loves dragging their knuckles (remember how long they sold they iPad 2 for?), but Samsung makes Apple eventually give us reasonable hardware, albeit much later than Apple COULD provide it. This phone looks gorgeous. I’m very excited for the iPhone 12. I hope Apple brought some real improvements to the table this year. The past couple years they’ve been cashing in on minor spec bumps.
 
I remember those periscope lenses being used in compact cameras way back and the quality was poor then, even before you add digital zoom. I don’t understand why you would stamp the name of a useless feature like 100x zoom on the back of the camera. It would be like Apple stamping a new iPhone with something like ‘super AR’ or ‘Photo booth’. (Sorry, it was hard to think of an appropriate half-baked analogy).
 
No because the current 5G modems won't perform carrier aggregation across all 5G bands being used.

Their x60 modem chip due to be released in 2021 will.
 
Does this mean we will be seeing a $2,000 iphone in 2020? 😬

Haha... probably.

But I thought technology is supposed to get faster and cheaper over time?

Phones have certainly gotten faster... but the prices keep rising.

What happened?

A long time ago a 55" 4K TV was $4,000. Now I can get one for $400

And yet phones went in the opposite direction.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.