TPS62180 is famous for failing. The chip quality has improved but the shoddy design is still there in the M4. One fail and the whole thing goes with it.Where did you hear that this was a widespread problem? Last time I heard about production issues with capacitors on a Mac was on iMacs c. 20 years ago.
If that wasn't enough, I live in a very humid environment out of spec, this in addition to poor quality chip history blowing from no external factors, humidity also invalidates warranty returns. (though Apple have been caught lying about liquid damage anyway).
This means I can't sit outside and use the Macbook. I have to make sure I'm sitting inside with air-conditioning.
I also need connectivity for the backup to work. I don't have access to broadband in central Hong Kong because all the connections are full, so I have to backup over the cell network, and this reduces what I backup in reality. I tend to only backup at night. Instant backup would lag the connection. Perhaps I need to tape an SSD to the laptop lid...?!
Or... run an M4 mini, modded with the SSD upgrade at home and remotely connect through to that?!
If you do the barest bit of searching, you'll see that Apple frequently tops surveys of reliability. They are miles more reliable than "cheaper brands". But even with a 3% failure rate: that's no consolation if you have one of the Friday afternoon units.
Files without a backup are waiting to be lost. It doesn't matter how reliable the computer is: you could overwrite the file or delete it, and without a backup: it's gone. It could get stolen, or water damaged.
Relying on hardware recovery after it's gone wrong is .. like relying on the hospital to mend you after the car crash. (In your un-serviced car, with no seat belt.)
True, but isn't this still WhatAboutIsm?
The design is shoddy. I'm making a lot of concessions to keep MacOS.