Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It's easy in the books to make sure that Hermione and Ron have a compatible attractiveness level, which isn't even relevant or a factor at all until they grow up a bit in the later books. So if you base it entirely on the books and not the movies, it's works just fine. But they cast these actors when they were children, and they were solid picks for the first movies. I can forgive them not being able to predict that Emma would blossom into such a beautiful woman or that Rupert wouldn't quite grow out of his awkwardness. And who knew poor Daniel would stop growing so early?

Ron was always so much taller than Harry in the books anyway so I think Daniel's height is quite spot-on.

More to your first point, they didn't really sell Harry and Ginny's relationship on screen either, which was very disappointing because she was a much more pivotal character in the books.

Back on the main topic, as a definite Potter Universe fan(not the biggest fan of his character, says the Slytherin with the Dark Mark tattoo[Yes, it is real]...), this enhanced edition will mark the fourth copy of the complete line into my collection. With my two paperback reading copies and my collector's chest of the seven hard-back copies(complete with the 'Quiddich Through the Ages', 'Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them' and the special version of 'Tales of Beedle the Bard' with the giant scripture encasement), this will be my first digital copy I will get. I never got the Pottermore copies as I was getting them digitally through my local library whenever I wanted to read them.
 
The books look great, but if only they could get rid of those ridiculous oversized margins in iBooks. It's particularly bad on the iPad mini where the extra space would be really useful
 
Strange, I was just saying the other day about how the ebook market was stagnating, largely because they've only ever been inferior copies of their physical book counterparts.

This however, is the direction they're starting to realise they should be going - interactive, artfully designed, doing things only a digital book can do.

I don't really care for re-reading Harry Potter, but this could be huge for the precedent it sets for the publishing industry.

I haven't done any recent research on the state of ebook market, and as much as real books are romanticized, personally, these days I do most of my book-reading on kindle paperwhite. I think it's a fantastic medium to read books with the whole e-ink and surface light thing. I hope they never stop making those!
 
  • Like
Reactions: orbital~debris
Not sure there's really a downside to forgetting about Harry Potter.

Oh how far we've come when we can't bother to remember to download something we want ;)

The release of JRR Tolkein's translation of Beowulf sure counted as a "take my money and get it on my e-reader ASAP! or sooner!" justification for pre-ordering. Having it within minutes of release was delightful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: orbital~debris
What is this that you speak of??

As per the article...

Harry Potter digital books were previously only available for purchase through the Pottermore shop that J.K. Rowling developed in partnership with Sony.

...the existing ebooks on the Pottermore shop/store are available as unrestricted epub files, which are not limited to one eco-system in the way Apple's iBooks are or Amazon Kindle purchases are. Which means you can put them in iBooks, or Kindle, or anything else that supports the format. Which is nice and grown up, trusting customers not to illegally distribute them after buying them, rather than employing DRM that locks the files to only certain approved devices/software.
 
I'm going to go out on a limb here and assume that the purchase of these wouldn't be covered under Family Sharing, meaning a separate copy for each person in a household? Seems the sort of thing the publishers would do.
 
As per the article...

...the existing ebooks on the Pottermore shop/store are available as unrestricted epub files, which are not limited to one eco-system in the way Apple's iBooks are or Amazon Kindle purchases are. Which means you can put them in iBooks, or Kindle, or anything else that supports the format. Which is nice and grown up, trusting customers not to illegally distribute them after buying them, rather than employing DRM that locks the files to only certain approved devices/software.

Absolutely. I've always followed this philosophy. I refuse to buy DRM'd versions of anything these days. Music, video, text, images – everything one buys today for use on one platform should be able to be used on any other in future. Otherwise what's the point of buying and using digital products? DRM kills future usability for the purchaser.

The only unanswered dichotomy that still remains unanswered (for both publishers, distributors, and therefore customers), is how to achieve this in the digital realm, when there is no way yet to stop unlimited file sharing when perfect duplicates can be shared ad infinitum with no control mechanisms.

I certainly hate the concept of having some books in one app, others in another, and yet more in a third/fourth/fifth. It's analogous to having books in entirely separate physical libraries – no cross referencing, no cross searching, no single user interface, and more, leaves the concept of digital books still with many unanswered questions.
 
As per the article...



...the existing ebooks on the Pottermore shop/store are available as unrestricted epub files, which are not limited to one eco-system in the way Apple's iBooks are or Amazon Kindle purchases are. Which means you can put them in iBooks, or Kindle, or anything else that supports the format. Which is nice and grown up, trusting customers not to illegally distribute them after buying them, rather than employing DRM that locks the files to only certain approved devices/software.
Thanks for helping a lazy man out :)

And as I don't have any other e-reader devices besides Apple devices, this isn't a problem for me =D
 
Thanks for helping a lazy man out :)

And as I don't have any other e-reader devices besides Apple devices, this isn't a problem for me =D

Lazy men are what stops the world going round too fast.:D

I have a variety of iBooks, Kindle books and legitimately-purchased DRM-free ebooks in various formats, I'm not criticising anyone who chooses whatever works for them, and sometimes the choice is made for you (like here, as the enhanced Potter books are exclusive to iBooks so if you're a fan who really wants them it's not like there are options).

The thing is, DRM isn't ever a problem for anyone, until it is (if you take my meaning)! I hope that moment never arrives for any of us, but eventually, inevitably, it bites some people in the posterior in some way.
 
This is great news, children clearly aren't bombarded enough with images and digital media. Now, we can totally eliminate their imagination too by superimposing animations and videos. Perhaps they can force touch a character to get a peek and pop look at the real thing.

Perhaps split view support or PiP to watch the movie when they got bored of certain parts. Progress indeed.
 
I can definitely see them going back to books that are ~10 years old and giving them this treatment to milk them for more money.

But for new books, I think they'll just keep on screwing customers over with crazy price tags for physical copies. As long as it's a physical copy, customers will assume it's worth as much as they're charging... they see through that BS when it's a digital copy, as if ink and paper are hard to come by.

It's not about new books vs. old books. It's about good books vs. bad books. A new, gussied-up edition isn't going to resurrect a 10-year-old flop.

As far as I'm concerned, people place too much value on paper and ink. When paper and ink were removed from the equation (ebooks and online media), people expected to pay next to nothing for the contents. The contents are all that matter. Either a book informs/entertains, or you have a pile of wood pulp (or wasted server resources). As with any form of entertainment or enlightenment, the public's willingness to pay the price is based on far more than the cost of paper, scenery, Internet bandwidth, or cushy seating.

The cost of printing and binding amount to 10%-12% of the list price of the typical book. Anyone who thinks eliminating 10% of the cost equates to a 50% (or greater) cut in price needs to invest in a good arithmetic textbook (and this is why, when Amazon introduced this perverse equation, the major publishers felt the need to band together).

It is up to the producer to ensure that, whatever the cover price/list price, the contents justify the price. Long term, nobody will spend $100 for a day at a theme park or a couple of hours at a Broadway theater if they consistently feel ripped off when they make their ways to the exit. If they consistently can't get past chapter one of a $29.95 "bestseller," they'll start spending that money on running shoes, board games, premium cable channels, kitchen accessories... whatever does manage to deliver adequate bang for their entertainment buck.

When you have a real winner on your hands, the same people will also pay to see the movie in IMAX, buy the DVD and/or pay-per-view, catch the Broadway musical, buy the cast album of the musical, see the movie version of the musical, gobble-up the video games, apps, action figures, and spin-off titles... add a hardcover collectors' edition to the shelf beside the crumbling paperback, and buy an ebook for the sake of whatever has been added to it. Such books are very few and far between. If they are "milked," it's because the public is still thirsty.
 
The cost of printing and binding amount to 10%-12% of the list price of the typical book. Anyone who thinks eliminating 10% of the cost equates to a 50% (or greater) cut in price needs to invest in a good arithmetic textbook (and this is why, when Amazon introduced this perverse equation, the major publishers felt the need to band together).

If you think printing costs alone are the major cost involved with physical copies no wonder you are confused.
 
As per the article...



...the existing ebooks on the Pottermore shop/store are available as unrestricted epub files, which are not limited to one eco-system in the way Apple's iBooks are or Amazon Kindle purchases are. Which means you can put them in iBooks, or Kindle, or anything else that supports the format. Which is nice and grown up, trusting customers not to illegally distribute them after buying them, rather than employing DRM that locks the files to only certain approved devices/software.

Reading my e-book versions of them AGAIN right now on my brand new E-reader. they've now lived on 3 different e-readers since I've bought them. All from different companies. No headaches, no messes, no frustrating DRM software, no locked in formats.

its how it should be. And i've never distributed them to anyone else.

Companies that employ restrictive DRM don't realize that people are generally willing to spend money if they're not locked down with proprietary software, or intrusive measures, or hoops that they need to jump through to enjoy their material. But when you start using things that make the experience frustrating to just enjoy, people resort to piracy methods that have already solved these issues for them
 
  • Like
Reactions: jimthing
Reading my e-book versions of them AGAIN right now on my brand new E-reader. they've now lived on 3 different e-readers since I've bought them. All from different companies. No headaches, no messes, no frustrating DRM software, no locked in formats.

its how it should be. And i've never distributed them to anyone else.

Companies that employ restrictive DRM don't realize that people are generally willing to spend money if they're not locked down with proprietary software, or intrusive measures, or hoops that they need to jump through to enjoy their material. But when you start using things that make the experience frustrating to just enjoy, people resort to piracy methods that have already solved these issues for them
Yes sure, as I said above, I agree. But the issue is also one of innovation.

Apple have extended the epub format into their own iBooks formatted version which arguably has more functionality than these standard epubs. And that makes it proprietary to them as a company. The problem therefore is them then wanting to capitalise on their innovation by keeping the format proprietary, rather than open it up to other vendors.

Amazon's the same really, as they use their own proprietary format as well. Just with less bells and whistles.

Unless that situation changes, or some other, less intrusive proprietarisation occurs in the industry, we're all losing out in the long run, because our books are stuck in one or another ecosystem, never to be released.

Another reason for me personally to only tending to buy DRM-free products; for the longterm benefits to myself.
 
absolutely, Would love ot see these technologies that are now getting into Amazon's and iBooks ebooks make its way into standardized epub in some form.
 
I don't know about software writers, but those guys at Lay's that made potato crisps taste like biscuits and gravy...yeah that was kind of magical. :D


That's more real-world alchemy than straight-up magic.

If you had a time machine and went back 40 years and accidentally brought your iPhone with you, many would regard that piece of technology as magic.

The same applies to medicine. Even in the last 40-50 years we have made huge gains in the medical field that was previously thought impossible.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.