harry potter not necessarily safe in book 7

[Chip NoVaMac]

These are the only people she could kill off......Ron, Hermione,or malfoy

From the news reports I heard, she is wanting to make sure that there can never be a follow-up book by another author. Sort along the lines of the follow-up the the Oz story.

 

[Mike Teezie]

I've always liked how J.K. Rowling isn't afraid to take the series to really dark places. I was so shocked in the last book when Malfoy brutally broke Harry's nose by stomping on his face.

That said, I don't want to see harry, Hermione, or Ron go. I'd rather see another Weasley, or maybe another semi-random school mate. Not the main three though.

 

[benthewraith]

She said she would kill off two characters. Below is my theory, in white writing, so only people who really want to know can know:

***Harry is the last horcrux. The prophesy said as long as one lives, the other shall too. Harry will have to sacrifice himself to kill off Voldemort for good. The. End.***

Actually, that theory's been tried and beaten over and over again, and it's been proven false. The prophesy implies that one of them will live, therefore, he can't be a horcrux, otherwise the prophesy is a hoax. There are seven horcruxes, not eight. And even if it were, I have a feeling that some reason were to come up and somehow Harry did live.

Though, after all he's been through, I'd like to see him live: the kid deserves it.

 

[benthewraith]

the situation that lord patton described would be very interesting, but i see harry killing snape before he has a chance to redeem himself.

This IS the most likely scenario.

Besides, just out of curiosity, but um, do yall have spoiler tags.

Hmm, apparently yall don't. That makes things a little more....difficult.