Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

NakedLunch

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Mar 19, 2009
11
0
Okay, so while the C2D vs. i5/i7 debate rages on, has anyone worked with final cut, DVD SP, Soundtrack on the 2010 MBP 13"?

Does the little machine keep up? I know it won't render nearly as well as an i5/i7 (and I'm not worried about Motion).

I'm coming from a dual 1.8 ghz power mac G5 (R.I.P.) and hoping to see a decent speed bump.

Reason I'm asking: I'm in a money crunch right now so I'd like to keep costs low as possible. I should be in the clear financially within the year (for the next wave of processors/updates) and plan on updating when that time comes.

Anyone actually used this machine with these apps? I know the specs but I want to hear a "real world" assessment.
 
I got a 2009 13uMBP 2.53 4G ram and I use FCP, Compressor and DVD SP for my part-time job. And yes, it works perfect - no lag time, no crashes.

Of course I got a 7200 rpm scratch disk hooked up through my FW 800. But I have no complaints. Yes, I would love more processor power and a bigger screen. BUT this gets the job done just fine.

I'm very happy with my computer
 
I use Final Cut Express regularly and it runs great. I'm under the impression FCE and FCP are pretty similar requirement so take that as you will.
 
Okay, so while the C2D vs. i5/i7 debate rages on, has anyone worked with final cut, DVD SP, Soundtrack on the 2010 MBP 13"?


I use FCE on a 15" MacBook Pro i7 and it's very stable as well as fast. I've used this setup in a war zone to create video reports without any bugs.
 
Why cant't people read the system requirements for the software they are thinking of? And why wouldn't any modern computer cope with a normal task as video editing? What are they thinking?

And if you are coming from a dual G5 1.8 that can cope with the task why wouldn't a more than five years newer computer do the same?
 
Why cant't people read the system requirements for the software they are thinking of? And why wouldn't any modern computer cope with a normal task as video editing? What are they thinking?

And if you are coming from a dual G5 1.8 that can cope with the task why wouldn't a more than five years newer computer do the same?

There's a difference between doing something and doing something well.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.