No, what I said in response to why there is so little outrage is that for those who can afford a new iPhone every 2 years their batteries don't weaken and therefore this phony throttlegate 'scandal' isn't something they concern themselves with.
Looks like I missed the party. Time to catch up.
Show proof that everyone with an iPhone upgrades to a new model every two years, or is capable of upgrading every two years. Otherwise, stop naively assuming that everyone lives in a beach house with a trophy wife. A lot of people with an iPhone I see are living in below average conditions. I mean, they can't even afford healthcare.
And last time I checked, until 6, iPhones cost $100 or $200 with phone company contract plans, at least here in the US. Big difference between paying full price and getting a discount. You will see that in the sales report on February. And you can see that on this chart(iPhone 6 came out on 2014):
The analogy is spot-on. I defend Apple in response to a post that defames Apple. I responded to someone who said that Apple is an "evil company" as if there aren't decent men and women working there. All justified, and necessary, responses.
Of course you defend. As does anyone who spend too much time AND money on an object/ideology/institution. This supports my initial argument that this is not just a phone for these people, it is a personal thing, an investment. The investment is in the company. By making the investment, you want a return, a satisfaction. For some people, this involves bragging about it online. More so for bolt if we are to assume his signature is not a complete lie. You never know what is real and what isn't. I mean, someone people have serious problems with posing/fabricating online. That is just who they are.
You are criticizing posting style. You should focus on content. Make an argument.
Your posting style is nothing different than that of a bully. Reckless, insulting, berating. Have I mentioned deplorable? I mean, who in the world sits all day defending a company every waking hour by demeaning others? I don't think that is normal.
I am only here because of the fraud Apple committed. Throttling people's phone to save the a cheap battery. Doesn't make sense. Why hide it? Why not tell customers of the
supposed failing battery? Deceptive, Fraudulent, Breaching Contract.
And I hope they pay, in the court system and with sales. Throttlegate is just starting. Now everyone with a slow or slower phone will think they are being slowed down by Apple, or will be told to that extend by others. And they indeed are being slowed down by Apple one way or another. Because:
Phones do not degrade, except for battery which is replaceable. But Apple introduces software updates with new models in mind, new models which are capable of handling higher demand and have higher CPU. However, a customer with an older phone is unable to make a choice between security/bug fixes and non-essential enhancements features. Therefore, newer and newer software themselves, because of demanding non-essential features introduced and forced, slow down older phones as they require more time to make computations. There is never a choice given between the two for a customer who just want security and bug fixes because of increased hacks/bugs and one's increasing usage of phone as their wallet.
"Privileged" and "shallow" are quite different things.
Some people who are shallow may think they are being judged because of their privilege. This has more to do with delusion than reality.
Okay, that's all for today. I will come back tomorrow. I am already behind on weekend errands.
P.S. Bolt, stop picking on these guys. Pick on someone your own size.
