I guess it is safe to say that the 2013 refresh will be the perfect time to buy a 13" Retina? People say that they have no problems with the HD 4000 running the current display but twice the performance should remove all doubt, no?
I guess it is safe to say that the 2013 refresh will be the perfect time to buy a 13" Retina? People say that they have no problems with the HD 4000 running the current display but twice the performance should remove all doubt, no?
Even the 15" rMBP with the 650m has slight lag when i use it. imo Retina is not quite there yet on laptops. Im sure people that spent money on one will defend it but im unbiased, i just use my Sisters from time to time and its not as smooth as my MBA or iMac.
The only place there's lag when the GT650M is engaged is in web browsers (excluding Safari Webkit Nightlies). This is purely a software issue.
The hardware is more than capable of running the UI perfectly @2800x1800 and the scaled resolutions.
If that's the case then one would think it would be addressed in OS 10.9. One would think
It's not really down to Apple's OSX updates to improve "Retina" mode behaviour in third party browsers, that's down to the vendor themselves, i.e. Google and Mozilla corp.
The only place there's lag when the GT650M is engaged is in web browsers (excluding Safari Webkit Nightlies). This is purely a software issue.
The hardware is more than capable of running the UI perfectly @2800x1800 and the scaled resolutions.
I never get nvidia engaged when running Safari.
Anyway, here is screenshots, the verge, scrolling like I have a seizure:
2880*1800 @200% zoom
1440*900 @100%, HiDPI.
mind you, the webpage looks exactly the same, the fonts are just as crisp etc etc.
So obviously, it has to do with HiDPI implementation and nothing else.
Only the first sentence was referring to your post sorry.I don't understand what you're getting at.
I was referring to the Safari Webkit Nightly builds which have fixed the scrolling issue.
http://nightly.webkit.org
The hardware is more than capable of running the UI perfectly @2800x1800 and the scaled resolutions.
if it lags while using the 650m, then it DEFINITELY is not a hardware issue. If that thing can play games like battlefield 3 on high at 1920x1200, it can handle scrolling through facebook lol.
i am getting sick and tired hearing people talk about the rmbp and lag as if it is down to hardware issues...
for f... sake... once and for all...
it is a software issue.
A little research didn't hurt anyone. This is going to be the "myth" surrounding rmbp forever...
or until apple fixes it already...
if it lags while using the 650m, then it DEFINITELY is not a hardware issue. If that thing can play games like battlefield 3 on high at 1920x1200, it can handle scrolling through facebook lol.
Yeah but the scrolling through facebook is a CPU intensive task, not a GPU intensive task...![]()
Safari currently is single-threaded. Luckily the webkit betas are multithreaded, which fixes the issue.
True. Still, i think the whole design is bloated and plagued with bugs.
Ever wondered why phones and tablets work so fine on CPUs that arent half as powerful? They had to be coded from ground up.
Safari currently is single-threaded. Luckily the webkit betas are multithreaded, which fixes the issue.
Yes, all based on Darwin. HOWEVER, because programmers had limited resources to work with the apps are designed to run way more efficiently.The iOS and Safari are very heavily based on the full-size Mac counterparts
to my experience same pages get choppy on the cMBP, the same amount. Gmail for instance.There are a couple pages where re-sizing the Safari window gets real choppy, but scrolling isn't as bad IMO
It's bad enough where 2X the performance wouldn't make it as smooth as it is on a cMBP