there is no way the sky output is the same as HBO Max, no chance. Its true we might be the HBO produced stuff, but after that, we don't get the rest of the content on SKY UK
Just cycle through them. You are just making excuses for piracy.Now we are going back to the situation where media is so scattered along services that it’s becoming filthy expensive to watch what I want.
It will. HBO Nordic will be gone. As for how any price increases will effect you, we will have to wait and see.Wondering if HBO Max will simply replace HBO Nordic (which I currently subscribe to)?
Agree ! I would add that for all digital contents, if you consider it worth it, you have to pay to get access of it. If you consider this doesn't worth the money asked for, then you leave it and live without it. Not paying digital content yet getting them from "Alternative or Parallel" free method is simply stealing the product which is not fair for the creators of such products (authors, music bands, ...)I read this a lot, but sorry, it just sounds like an excuse.
There was no mythical time when streaming services first appeared and one or two services gave you access to all media.
Back then, we got maybe 20% of all content and complained that the rest wasn't being sold (so we "had to" pirate it). Now 80% of all content is available for sale (so we "have to" pirate it, because we actually didn't want to pay that much). (And somehow you're actually complaining about both at the same time here.)
If you want "all the stuff" and "right away" I think it's okay to ask you to pay a lot. That's how so many streaming services can thrive and why they're motivated to produce more AAA content than ever. If you don't need it right away, you can just subscribe to one service per month and binge everything at an extremely affordable price. That model has existed for ever in movies going from cinemas to rentals to TV. It means pricing based on demand.
Wanting both immediacy and a low price isn't a valid reason for piracy. It's just something to tell yourself to justify using that loophole.
we have also Monaco and San Marino on the listYou forgot Liechtenstein: 8! 😀
You missed the point. In the beginning there were only a few streaming services and if you had a subscription to them, you could see most content. Now we’re getting to a point where every studio has its own service and walled off garden. Imagine if every music label started having their own streaming service and you had to subscribe to 7 different music services to listen to all the artists you enjoy.I read this a lot, but sorry, it just sounds like an excuse.
In the beginning there were only a few streaming services and if you had a subscription to them, you could see most content.
First of all, you don't have to subscribe to multiple services. It's a free choice, based on your priorities and wants. You also have the option of subscribing to all of them at once or simply cycle through them (as I do). I don't know if you remember, but for quite a while the only way to watch what we liked was to spend $20 on a VHS/DVD, and that was for one single movie. Now with $15 you can watch and re-watch multiple movies, TV series etc. so your complaint about good ol' times is utterly misleading at best.Now we’re getting to a point where every studio has its own service and walled off garden. Imagine if every music label started having their own streaming service and you had to subscribe to 7 different music services to listen to all the artists you enjoy.
What are you on about? A lot of Disney media was on Netflix before. Now it’s on their own service. The only extra ‘choice’ that came from this, is the choice to subscribe to yet another service.Not true. You could see most of THEIR content. Exactly as today. I couldn't watch lots of stuff on Netflix or Hulu because they didn't have it. The same applies today, we simply have more choices.
It’s completely comparable… ‘Different people involved’ ok and?Comparing Video content to Music is also pretty asinine. They are two different business, with different people involved, different target audiences, different markets, and different distribution rights and methods.
Oh no! How will [multi billion Dollar corporation dodging taxes] survive!The bottom line, is that for what concern morality and the law, you're stealing.
What are you on about? A lot of Disney media was on Netflix before. Now it’s on their own service. The only extra ‘choice’ that came from this, is the choice to subscribe to yet another service.
What an ignorant comment. First of all, you have no right to steal; it doesn't matter if the company is a multi-billion dollar company, or just a mom and pop shop. The amount of money they make doesn't authorize you from stealing.Oh no! How will [multi billion Dollar corporation dodging taxes] survive!I feel so bad.
People upset that HBO isn’t in their country should be upset with their government, not HBO. It’s red tape from governments that hold things up.
Imagine getting this upset online over someone watching a movie for free. Sheesh brother, leave some boot for the rest of us.Second, if you put it on the Robin Hood morality, why don't you go steal at a Walmart? They are a multi-billion dollar company, right? Oh, because you know you have to show your face in order to do so.
I am not upset at all. I am just pointing out how misleading and wrong - even from the historical perspective - your comments are... all because you don't want to pay your dues (to then complain about corporation not paying the taxes that in your opinion they should pay).Imagine getting this upset online over someone watching a movie for free.
Sheesh brother, leave some boot for the rest of us.
No thanks, we don't need content split over even more providers.They need to get it out in the UK fk sky.
There was an interview of the regional director in today’s news and she said that it’s a completely new service, new tech, new app and new categories including Warner Bros, DC, Cartoon Network, HBO and HBO Max Original.HBO nordic has been around for years, wonder if this simply isn't a rebranding and that's why those countries gets HBO Max first in Europe. Anyways, it'll be interesting to see if HBO Max adds any value compared to HBO Nordic.
Wondering if HBO Max will simply replace HBO Nordic (which I currently subscribe to)?
Yup... I really like paying for content properly, but between juggling and sorting Smart DNS, VPNs, crappy apps, content switching providers and coming and going requiring subscribing to every single service costing way more than the old cable solutions and it's come to a point where it's just easier to give the legal and MBA media bozos the finger and torrenting content on the intertubes...In the beginning of media being available online, I used to fly the Jolly Roger as it were. Then streaming services came in and I started paying a monthly fee to 1 or 2 services happily for easy access to media. Now we are going back to the situation where media is so scattered along services that it’s becoming filthy expensive to watch what I want. Let alone the fact that I have found a lot of content to be just unavailable through any paid service where I live, actually impossible to watch it legally.
I now find myself going back to flying the ’ol 🏴☠️ more frequently. Life is a circle it seems.