I want to run a hdmi signal over a long distance and was going to use a cat5 cable but can't find a mini displayport to cat5 converter or a hdmi to cat5 converter. I'm not sure this is even possible, but don't know why it wouldn't be because you can stream HD content over the internet using cat5. And a long cat5 cable is a lot cheaper than hdmi cables and extenders. Can you pleae help me.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
hdmi or mini displayport to cat5 video converter
- Thread starter mjcorbitt
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
HDMI is a media interface whereas Cat5 transmits signal data in things like ethernet networks. Sure, you can stream information over a cat5, but it has to be interpreted by hardware on the other side. Various media servers are used in this scenario. HDMI passes video and audio data to display hardware. TV sets and receiver boxes know how to interpret this formatted data and output media.
You cannot simply buy a cable that passes data from an HDMI/displayport to a cat5, the protocols are different. You either need to stream data from an ethernet cable to media hardware that can output the feed to an HDMI (or other A/V output) or use a displayport to HDMI connector, and directly connect to your TV/receiver.
You cannot simply buy a cable that passes data from an HDMI/displayport to a cat5, the protocols are different. You either need to stream data from an ethernet cable to media hardware that can output the feed to an HDMI (or other A/V output) or use a displayport to HDMI connector, and directly connect to your TV/receiver.
Looking for this?
http://www.monoprice.com/products/p...=10105&cs_id=1010504&p_id=4065&seq=1&format=2
Edit: Eddyisgreat beat me by 2 mins
http://www.monoprice.com/products/p...=10105&cs_id=1010504&p_id=4065&seq=1&format=2
Edit: Eddyisgreat beat me by 2 mins
And a big touche' to the first couple of replies
Not at all. He never mentioned the distance so you have no idea if this will work for him. I asked what the distance was and said the HDMI and Ethernet were two very different protocols. Don't really see how that is "a big touche'" unless you are trying to start a fight.
The first two replies are misinterpreting the problem. The OP wants to use the wires in a cat 5 cable as a HDMI cable. Wires are wires, so it should work as long as there are not impedance/crosstalk/twisting/shielding issues that make the signals transmitted incompatible. Otherwise the cable doesn't care what kind of data it transmits.
The above adapter requires Cat6a shielded (STP) cable for runs between 30-50 meters. It's probably a good idea to use that kind of cable even for shorter runs if possible, for best results.
Monoprice sells Cat6a STP cables for a reasonable price
http://www.monoprice.com/products/p...=10232&cs_id=1023216&p_id=5905&seq=1&format=2
(also in a variety of other lengths).
edit: I though I'd add that HD over the internet is streamed highly compressed and requires very complex encoding and somewhat complex decoding. HDMI sends data uncompressed, so instead of megabytes per second it requires gigabytes per second (up to 10gbps for the latest HDMI spec at the highest resolution).
For extremely long distances (more then the length allowed that adapter), fiber optic transmission would probably be required. But once you go to fiber, there is virtually no length limit.
The above adapter requires Cat6a shielded (STP) cable for runs between 30-50 meters. It's probably a good idea to use that kind of cable even for shorter runs if possible, for best results.
Monoprice sells Cat6a STP cables for a reasonable price
http://www.monoprice.com/products/p...=10232&cs_id=1023216&p_id=5905&seq=1&format=2
(also in a variety of other lengths).
edit: I though I'd add that HD over the internet is streamed highly compressed and requires very complex encoding and somewhat complex decoding. HDMI sends data uncompressed, so instead of megabytes per second it requires gigabytes per second (up to 10gbps for the latest HDMI spec at the highest resolution).
For extremely long distances (more then the length allowed that adapter), fiber optic transmission would probably be required. But once you go to fiber, there is virtually no length limit.
Sigh - If they're "two different protocols" as originally suggested then it doesn't matter if it's 1 foot or 1 mile - the implication was that a different solution than HDMI/Catx would be required and distance would affect that other potential solution, thus becoming an important factor.
Whatever man, not trying to start a fight just pointing out humor I saw in the first two very educated sounding replies frankly totally missing the point. He asked for "an hdmi to cat5 converter": two replies talking about perceived problems and protocol issues - one link with the absolute solution. Sorry but when you work in the IT world like I do that's funny...
See - I'm not the only one that thought it missed the issue.
Thanks a lot. This is what i was looking for. I looked on mono
price but didn't find this.