Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Just to repeat (since it's worth repeating), "glasses-free 3D" is a misleading term here, since the function provided by the addition of head-tracking is not a function normally facilitated by 3D glasses.

The demo does not produce the illusion that any of the pixels exist on a plane other than the surface of the display (unless you close one eye or otherwise curtail your depth perception).
 
Last edited:
Will pirates be able to use this technology? I'm not sure how successful the eye tracking will be when using an eye patch.
 
Will pirates be able to use this technology? I'm not sure how successful the eye tracking will be when using an eye patch.

Yeah, but they are likely not part of the iPad ecosystem anyway since they have a hook for a hand, and hence cannot readily take full advantage of the multi touch display.
 
I will develop an iApp for scheduling Eye Dr. appointments...this is going to be huge...and there will be an App for that!

iVizco

Beta Icon
 

Attachments

  • Screen shot 2011-04-11 at 7.36.51 PM.png
    Screen shot 2011-04-11 at 7.36.51 PM.png
    41.2 KB · Views: 463
This would be nice for games. Let's see what else it could be used for...
 
People seem to be missing that to provide the 3D illusion with this effect it requires an almost constant motion, otherwise it will just resemble a flat image of a 3d surface.

This makes any actual use of this kind of silly, and makes the viewing of 3D videos and images still impossible for the iPad This is because both videos and 3D images (.mpo files) have two images sent to each eye separately which this method of 3D is completely incapable of because it requires fully rendered models for viewing.

A parallax barrier, such as the one on the 3DS, or other legitimate 3D viewing method would be required to have any real use, particularly without forcing the user to constantly move their head or the device that they're holding to maintain the 3D effect.

I totally agree. Though the effect is cool, it's not practical to move your head constantly to achieve the effect. That would be quite annoying while playing a game or watching a 3D movie.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: ProfessionalFan
Yeah okay I see that now. Sorry.

It's still not the same as the kinds that use gyro/acceleration.

Would it be possible to use both the camera to track the head and the gyroscope / accelerometer to track the movement of the ipad?
 
You guys are clearly missing the point of this... It is not at all the same thing as the silly 3D movies, where you put on special glasses and get to see things jumping out at you...

This is a 2D image that is simulating depth and parallax perspective in real time based on your movements in the world.

What this means is that unlike any of the 3D effects you see in movies, you can actually move your head to the side and look behind things.

This is way more of a "true" 3D effect than what you get in the movies... That's more of a bass-relief... you never get to see anything that isn't already baked into the image.

With this effect, if there's something in your way, you can move to the side and see around it.

This is really awesome.
 
With this type of 3D I don't think it would give you headaches like normal no glasses 3D would. Very cool.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_6 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8E200 Safari/6533.18.5)

This is just awesome. I am so excited by the developers really utilizing the hardware.
 
Will pirates be able to use this technology? I'm not sure how successful the eye tracking will be when using an eye patch.

Arrr, the beauty of this is that it works for people who only have vision in one eye - Google "Wiggle Stereoscopy". Presumably it be head tracking rather than eye tracking.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.